Fw: [討論] 馬刺隊的POPO教練
看板Spurs作者RJefferson (Richard Jefferson)時間11年前 (2013/05/07 23:08)推噓126(131推 5噓 344→)留言480則, 40人參與討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板 #1HYHS9MK ]
作者: RJefferson (Richard Jefferson) 看板: NBA
標題: Re: [討論] 馬刺隊的POPO教練
時間: Tue May 7 23:00:22 2013
我看球賽很少會去討論球迷的語氣,但是今天真的誇張到一個地步。
推
05/07 09:59,
05/07 09:59
→
05/07 11:25,
05/07 11:25
→
05/07 11:25,
05/07 11:25
推
05/07 11:29,
05/07 11:29
→
05/07 11:29,
05/07 11:29
→
05/07 11:30,
05/07 11:30
→
05/07 11:35,
05/07 11:35
→
05/07 11:35,
05/07 11:35
噓
05/07 11:45,
05/07 11:45
推
05/07 11:53,
05/07 11:53
→
05/07 11:55,
05/07 11:55
→
05/07 11:55,
05/07 11:55
→
05/07 11:56,
05/07 11:56
→
05/07 11:56,
05/07 11:56
→
05/07 11:57,
05/07 11:57
→
05/07 11:58,
05/07 11:58
→
05/07 11:58,
05/07 11:58
我不曉得季後賽沒拿橫掃是不是等於失敗,但一位帶隊10幾年、奪四冠的總教練,好說歹
說也是現役傳奇教頭之一,卻被所謂的資深刺迷這樣責罵,甚至是自盡、下台,我不認為
對討論有什麼幫助。
一直指責其他刺迷們只會討論板友、試圖成為一言堂的同時,你們罵老番顛已經是習慣性
動作,卻又不甩其他板友的規勸,難道不也是一言堂的一種嗎??
勇士本來就不弱,球員年輕氣盛、打馬英雄J. Jack,加上S. Curry爆走鬼神的三分,就
算今天慘敗也不意外。
如果用一次敗場找出對症下藥的措施,不也是一種方式??
沒人喜歡輸球,老波有責任沒錯,但竟然連自盡、下台都出現了,我真的想不透哪一位可
以當總教練了。
---------------------------------------------
哦,有人說我不是球隊拼圖的解答,今天我不是馬刺贏球的答案嗎(挺
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.255.94.109
推
05/07 23:01, , 1F
05/07 23:01, 1F
推
05/07 23:01, , 2F
05/07 23:01, 2F
推
05/07 23:01, , 3F
05/07 23:01, 3F
推
05/07 23:01, , 4F
05/07 23:01, 4F
推
05/07 23:03, , 5F
05/07 23:03, 5F
推
05/07 23:03, , 6F
05/07 23:03, 6F
※ 編輯: RJefferson 來自: 111.255.94.109 (05/07 23:05)
推
05/07 23:04, , 7F
05/07 23:04, 7F
→
05/07 23:05, , 8F
05/07 23:05, 8F
噓
05/07 23:06, , 9F
05/07 23:06, 9F
推
05/07 23:06, , 10F
05/07 23:06, 10F
→
05/07 23:06, , 11F
05/07 23:06, 11F
→
05/07 23:06, , 12F
05/07 23:06, 12F
推
05/07 23:07, , 13F
05/07 23:07, 13F
轉回隊板,你還會給我「一言堂」論的回覆嗎?
※ 編輯: RJefferson 來自: 111.255.94.109 (05/07 23:08)
推
05/07 23:07, , 14F
05/07 23:07, 14F
→
05/07 23:07, , 15F
05/07 23:07, 15F
推
05/07 23:07, , 16F
05/07 23:07, 16F
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: RJefferson (111.255.94.109), 時間: 05/07/2013 23:08:32
推
05/07 23:12, , 17F
05/07 23:12, 17F
→
05/07 23:12, , 18F
05/07 23:12, 18F
還有 438 則推文
還有 23 段內文
→
05/08 01:39, , 457F
05/08 01:39, 457F
→
05/08 01:40, , 458F
05/08 01:40, 458F
推
05/08 01:40, , 459F
05/08 01:40, 459F
推
05/08 01:40, , 460F
05/08 01:40, 460F
→
05/08 01:41, , 461F
05/08 01:41, 461F
推
05/08 01:41, , 462F
05/08 01:41, 462F
→
05/08 01:41, , 463F
05/08 01:41, 463F
推
05/08 01:43, , 464F
05/08 01:43, 464F
→
05/08 01:43, , 465F
05/08 01:43, 465F
→
05/08 01:43, , 466F
05/08 01:43, 466F
→
05/08 01:44, , 467F
05/08 01:44, 467F
→
05/08 01:44, , 468F
05/08 01:44, 468F
推
05/08 01:45, , 469F
05/08 01:45, 469F
→
05/08 01:45, , 470F
05/08 01:45, 470F
推
05/08 01:48, , 471F
05/08 01:48, 471F
→
05/08 01:48, , 472F
05/08 01:48, 472F
→
05/08 01:49, , 473F
05/08 01:49, 473F
推
05/08 01:50, , 474F
05/08 01:50, 474F
→
05/08 01:50, , 475F
05/08 01:50, 475F
→
05/08 01:50, , 476F
05/08 01:50, 476F
→
05/08 01:51, , 477F
05/08 01:51, 477F
→
05/08 01:51, , 478F
05/08 01:51, 478F
→
05/08 01:51, , 479F
05/08 01:51, 479F
推
05/08 01:53, , 480F
05/08 01:53, 480F
→
05/08 01:53, , 481F
05/08 01:53, 481F
→
05/08 01:54, , 482F
05/08 01:54, 482F
推
05/08 01:55, , 483F
05/08 01:55, 483F
→
05/08 01:55, , 484F
05/08 01:55, 484F
推
05/08 01:57, , 485F
05/08 01:57, 485F
→
05/08 01:57, , 486F
05/08 01:57, 486F
→
05/08 01:59, , 487F
05/08 01:59, 487F
→
05/08 01:59, , 488F
05/08 01:59, 488F
→
05/08 02:00, , 489F
05/08 02:00, 489F
→
05/08 02:00, , 490F
05/08 02:00, 490F
推
05/08 02:03, , 491F
05/08 02:03, 491F
→
05/08 02:03, , 492F
05/08 02:03, 492F
推
05/08 02:07, , 493F
05/08 02:07, 493F
→
05/08 02:07, , 494F
05/08 02:07, 494F
推
05/08 02:08, , 495F
05/08 02:08, 495F
→
05/08 02:08, , 496F
05/08 02:08, 496F