[請益] 是在py啥?
看板Soft_Job作者rosemary0401 (rosemary)時間12年前 (2013/09/29 11:57)推噓23(23推 0噓 43→)留言66則, 38人參與討論串1/4 (看更多)
以前在寫windows desktop application時,大多跟著MS的腳步在走,
一開始用C\C++ 和 MFC framework,
MS推.NET之後,就改用C# 和 WPF framework。
這時會用的語言很少,不過就C\C++\C# (有OO的觀念,C#不難學)
後來換工作改做Web application,要學的語言突然暴增,
HTML、CSS、JavaScript、PHP、ASP.NET、C\C++、C#、SQL...
開始思考為什麼會要用這麼多語言,
以目前工作所需來說,
後端用ASP.NET\C#\C++\SQL,
用.NET framework來寫web application很方便,
比較需要效能的task用C++來寫成module,給C#來呼叫,
(C++因為直接編譯成native code所以比較快)
需要access資料庫就用SQL (寫預儲程序或直些寫在code裡)
但我一直不太懂的是,聽說有些人後端是有用python在寫的,
不懂用python寫的好處在哪?
C#和python比起來沒有比較難學,python寫出來的效能又比不上C++。
如果後端不是用MS的ASP.NET,而是用PHP的話,
PHP + Python真的有比PHP + C\C++還要好用嗎?
不知道有人評估過,用python寫後端的好處在哪裡?
值得一提的是,之前有人說寫testing需要會script language比較好,所以可以學python
,
但是script language那麼多,為啥要挑python?理由是甚麼呢?
之前聽說有某軟體公司的windows desktop application的UI是用python寫,原因不明
幾年前都不太聽過python,現在寫python的人好像有變多的趨勢,為什麼呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.116.153.199
→
09/29 12:05, , 1F
09/29 12:05, 1F
推
09/29 12:18, , 2F
09/29 12:18, 2F
→
09/29 12:33, , 3F
09/29 12:33, 3F
推
09/29 12:47, , 4F
09/29 12:47, 4F
→
09/29 12:57, , 5F
09/29 12:57, 5F
推
09/29 13:01, , 6F
09/29 13:01, 6F
→
09/29 13:04, , 7F
09/29 13:04, 7F
→
09/29 13:34, , 8F
09/29 13:34, 8F
→
09/29 14:12, , 9F
09/29 14:12, 9F
→
09/29 14:21, , 10F
09/29 14:21, 10F
推
09/29 15:33, , 11F
09/29 15:33, 11F
推
09/29 16:09, , 12F
09/29 16:09, 12F
→
09/29 16:10, , 13F
09/29 16:10, 13F
→
09/29 16:10, , 14F
09/29 16:10, 14F
→
09/29 16:10, , 15F
09/29 16:10, 15F
→
09/29 16:11, , 16F
09/29 16:11, 16F
→
09/29 16:11, , 17F
09/29 16:11, 17F
→
09/29 16:12, , 18F
09/29 16:12, 18F
→
09/29 16:13, , 19F
09/29 16:13, 19F
→
09/29 16:14, , 20F
09/29 16:14, 20F
推
09/29 16:36, , 21F
09/29 16:36, 21F
→
09/29 16:36, , 22F
09/29 16:36, 22F
推
09/29 16:40, , 23F
09/29 16:40, 23F
推
09/29 16:44, , 24F
09/29 16:44, 24F
→
09/29 16:55, , 25F
09/29 16:55, 25F
→
09/29 16:57, , 26F
09/29 16:57, 26F
→
09/29 16:59, , 27F
09/29 16:59, 27F
→
09/29 16:59, , 28F
09/29 16:59, 28F
推
09/29 17:06, , 29F
09/29 17:06, 29F
→
09/29 17:06, , 30F
09/29 17:06, 30F
推
09/29 17:12, , 31F
09/29 17:12, 31F
推
09/29 17:23, , 32F
09/29 17:23, 32F
→
09/29 17:31, , 33F
09/29 17:31, 33F
推
09/29 17:52, , 34F
09/29 17:52, 34F
→
09/29 17:52, , 35F
09/29 17:52, 35F
→
09/29 17:54, , 36F
09/29 17:54, 36F
推
09/29 19:40, , 37F
09/29 19:40, 37F
推
09/29 21:12, , 38F
09/29 21:12, 38F
推
09/29 22:11, , 39F
09/29 22:11, 39F
推
09/29 22:45, , 40F
09/29 22:45, 40F
→
09/29 22:50, , 41F
09/29 22:50, 41F
→
09/29 22:57, , 42F
09/29 22:57, 42F
推
09/30 00:01, , 43F
09/30 00:01, 43F
推
09/30 02:35, , 44F
09/30 02:35, 44F
→
09/30 02:40, , 45F
09/30 02:40, 45F
→
09/30 02:42, , 46F
09/30 02:42, 46F
→
09/30 02:44, , 47F
09/30 02:44, 47F
→
09/30 02:47, , 48F
09/30 02:47, 48F
推
09/30 09:26, , 49F
09/30 09:26, 49F
推
09/30 10:00, , 50F
09/30 10:00, 50F
→
09/30 10:07, , 51F
09/30 10:07, 51F
→
09/30 11:16, , 52F
09/30 11:16, 52F
→
09/30 11:22, , 53F
09/30 11:22, 53F
→
09/30 11:27, , 54F
09/30 11:27, 54F
→
09/30 20:56, , 55F
09/30 20:56, 55F
→
10/01 02:16, , 56F
10/01 02:16, 56F
推
10/05 19:39, , 57F
10/05 19:39, 57F
→
10/05 19:39, , 58F
10/05 19:39, 58F
→
10/05 19:40, , 59F
10/05 19:40, 59F
→
10/09 21:14, , 60F
10/09 21:14, 60F
→
10/09 21:14, , 61F
10/09 21:14, 61F
推
10/12 00:25, , 62F
10/12 00:25, 62F
→
10/12 00:27, , 63F
10/12 00:27, 63F
→
10/12 00:28, , 64F
10/12 00:28, 64F
→
10/12 00:28, , 65F
10/12 00:28, 65F
推
10/13 18:33, , 66F
10/13 18:33, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)