[轉錄]AI新消息:只肯去強隊,若被交換至弱隊넠…
※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板]
作者: outdance (修身) 看板: NBA
標題: AI新消息:只肯去強隊,若被交換至弱隊將拒絕報到
時間: Mon Dec 18 09:50:53 2006
http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/sports/16252525.htm
In the least surprising story of the year, the Sixers have discovered that
trading Allen Iverson isn't as easy as it used to be.
Iverson has made it clear he will refuse to report to any rebuilding or struggling
club hoping to use him as a short-term ATM to fill up the seats and, somewhat
less importantly, the basket. The 31-year-old Iverson doesn't have a no-
trade clause in his contract, but has the power to scotch any deal because
no one doubts that he would sit out rather than lose control of his fate
.
Iverson, understandably, wants to go to a contender. Certain contenders,
understandably, have interest, but few of them have sufficient cap room to
take Iverson's contract. And fewer still would be willing to part with their
core players to trade for him. They are already contenders, drawing decent
crowds and unsure of the chemical reaction that would take place by adding
Iverson to the formula.
So the list of compatible teams is a short one, and the packages of players
that would be coming back to the Sixers are, thus far, not very attractive
. At some point, Billy King is going to have to decide that picking at this
situation isn't going to make it better. He will have to take the best of
a bad lot and move on.
費城當地媒體:
76人管理層發現交換AI並沒有預想中那麼容易。
AI清楚表示若被交換至弱隊或正重建中的隊伍,將會拒絕報到。想把AI換來只為吸
引票房或是短暫過渡的隊伍可以放棄這個念頭了,因為沒有人會懷疑AI會真的寧願不
打を也不肯把命運交給別人掌控。
可以理解的是,AI想去有望奪冠的隊伍。而這些隊伍中,有的也確實有意,但卻又沒
有足夠的薪酬空間來吸納AI的合同,或是不願拿出他們的核心球員們來換AI。因為他
們已經是成型強隊了,不願冒這個險。
所以符合條件的球隊名單就很短了,而他們提出的交換方案雖然對76人來說沒什麼吸
引力。但在此刻,76人也只好不得不從這些都很不讓人滿意的選擇中挑出一個相對好
點的,把生活繼續下去。
됊
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.191.87.116
→
12/18 09:52,
12/18 09:52
推
12/18 09:55,
12/18 09:55
推
12/18 09:54,
12/18 09:54
→
12/18 09:57,
12/18 09:57
推
12/18 09:57,
12/18 09:57
推
12/18 09:57,
12/18 09:57
推
12/18 09:59,
12/18 09:59
推
12/18 10:00,
12/18 10:00
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.128.195.241
推
12/18 10:02, , 1F
12/18 10:02, 1F
推
12/18 10:04, , 2F
12/18 10:04, 2F
推
12/18 10:04, , 3F
12/18 10:04, 3F
推
12/18 10:33, , 4F
12/18 10:33, 4F
推
12/18 10:49, , 5F
12/18 10:49, 5F
推
12/18 10:49, , 6F
12/18 10:49, 6F
推
12/18 10:53, , 7F
12/18 10:53, 7F
→
12/18 10:54, , 8F
12/18 10:54, 8F
推
12/18 10:55, , 9F
12/18 10:55, 9F
推
12/18 11:05, , 10F
12/18 11:05, 10F
推
12/18 11:47, , 11F
12/18 11:47, 11F
推
12/18 12:30, , 12F
12/18 12:30, 12F
→
12/18 12:30, , 13F
12/18 12:30, 13F
推
12/19 14:37, , 14F
12/19 14:37, 14F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):