[討論] 對於蔡英文當選 未來社工界將會怎麼發展
針對現在的基層社工 薪資少的可憐....又不被重視
社工的專業只有社工知道 唉
對別人的印象 我們不比護理來的專業 也沒OT來的高階
一直卡在尷尬位子的社工地位 叫人工作不知去向
各位對於蔡英文當選 會讓社工即將被重視嗎?
還是說一樣是個定位模糊 專業質疑 機動人員的嗎?
小弟對於台灣社工界已無期待 只有幫助弱勢的成就感讓我堅持這麼久 不知社工界的男士如何養家 好奇@@
-----
Sent from JPTT on my iPhone
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.246.71.24
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/SW_Job/M.1454735971.A.CEA.html
→
02/06 15:55, , 1F
02/06 15:55, 1F
推
02/06 19:15, , 2F
02/06 19:15, 2F
那社工這個行業真的頗可憐
推
02/06 20:12, , 3F
02/06 20:12, 3F
推
02/06 20:21, , 4F
02/06 20:21, 4F
我覺得東吳 台大社工可以收收起來了 別害人害己
※ 編輯: kiss78832 (123.110.192.143), 02/06/2016 20:35:16
※ 編輯: kiss78832 (123.110.192.143), 02/06/2016 20:36:54
→
02/07 07:54, , 5F
02/07 07:54, 5F
推
02/07 14:18, , 6F
02/07 14:18, 6F
推
02/07 22:51, , 7F
02/07 22:51, 7F
推
02/08 00:03, , 8F
02/08 00:03, 8F
推
02/09 00:18, , 9F
02/09 00:18, 9F
推
02/09 12:51, , 10F
02/09 12:51, 10F
推
02/09 13:36, , 11F
02/09 13:36, 11F
→
02/09 15:23, , 12F
02/09 15:23, 12F
推
02/09 16:06, , 13F
02/09 16:06, 13F
噓
02/10 00:03, , 14F
02/10 00:03, 14F
→
02/10 11:34, , 15F
02/10 11:34, 15F
推
02/11 00:10, , 16F
02/11 00:10, 16F
→
02/11 00:10, , 17F
02/11 00:10, 17F
→
02/11 01:43, , 18F
02/11 01:43, 18F
→
02/11 01:49, , 19F
02/11 01:49, 19F
→
02/11 01:49, , 20F
02/11 01:49, 20F
→
02/11 01:49, , 21F
02/11 01:49, 21F
→
02/11 01:49, , 22F
02/11 01:49, 22F
→
02/11 10:32, , 23F
02/11 10:32, 23F
→
02/11 10:32, , 24F
02/11 10:32, 24F
→
02/11 10:32, , 25F
02/11 10:32, 25F
→
02/11 15:21, , 26F
02/11 15:21, 26F
→
02/11 15:21, , 27F
02/11 15:21, 27F
→
02/11 15:21, , 28F
02/11 15:21, 28F
→
02/11 15:21, , 29F
02/11 15:21, 29F
→
02/11 15:21, , 30F
02/11 15:21, 30F
噓
02/11 21:18, , 31F
02/11 21:18, 31F
→
02/11 21:20, , 32F
02/11 21:20, 32F
→
02/11 21:21, , 33F
02/11 21:21, 33F
推
02/12 02:39, , 34F
02/12 02:39, 34F
→
02/12 08:27, , 35F
02/12 08:27, 35F
→
02/12 10:38, , 36F
02/12 10:38, 36F
→
02/12 10:38, , 37F
02/12 10:38, 37F
→
02/12 10:38, , 38F
02/12 10:38, 38F
→
02/12 10:38, , 39F
02/12 10:38, 39F
→
02/12 10:38, , 40F
02/12 10:38, 40F
→
02/12 10:38, , 41F
02/12 10:38, 41F
→
02/12 10:38, , 42F
02/12 10:38, 42F
→
02/12 10:38, , 43F
02/12 10:38, 43F
→
02/12 11:45, , 44F
02/12 11:45, 44F
→
02/12 11:47, , 45F
02/12 11:47, 45F
→
02/12 11:47, , 46F
02/12 11:47, 46F
噓
02/12 12:52, , 47F
02/12 12:52, 47F
噓
02/12 14:53, , 48F
02/12 14:53, 48F
→
02/13 22:55, , 49F
02/13 22:55, 49F
→
02/13 22:56, , 50F
02/13 22:56, 50F
→
03/07 21:36, , 51F
03/07 21:36, 51F
→
04/13 01:18, , 52F
04/13 01:18, 52F
→
04/13 01:18, , 53F
04/13 01:18, 53F
→
04/13 01:19, , 54F
04/13 01:19, 54F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):