Re: [討論] 難道李燕只能跟陳冠霖配?
其實不計較這種虎爛劇情單看網友做的mv是非常蠻感人
昇昇詩詩mv
http://ppt.cc/HV47
N次的詩詩差點撲倒昇昇即時接住的言小場景,
難怪撲到最後,昇昇會愛上天使詩詩。
缺點是編劇把參考來的49 days改得不太感動
49不只有愛情還有探討人性的醜惡,編劇拿來用之後
只一直故意刻畫文詩生死相許的愛情就顯得比較單薄無趣
而且,我個人覺得寫得馬立昇這角色寫得沒有起伏,敗筆之一!
馬立昇這個角色套在49中就相當於「宋宜景」,很可惜是沒多大關鍵發揮性
反而讓我覺得陳冠霖的演技是怎麼了嗎?
他明明演技很好為什麼怎麼看都是浮誇的陳家寶,好像變不出什麼?
儘管編劇安插了小亞,但馬立昇在劇中除了被附身外其餘跟小亞互動也不感人......
然後再說說翰文
雖然人設有點差,整體糟透了...
可是我觀察一下謝仔仔哭戲都有做足即便這角色真的不是很吃香
可是依照編劇想走的冠燕配,必然會犧牲翰文
我想他沒辦法像上一檔男主角天誠葛格一路演到尾~
中間來亂入一下mv~
網友製作49days插曲mv
http://ppt.cc/Gp9, (翰文之49日)
看完再看原始的49days
http://ppt.cc/9G7K (有49days的雷)
所以~~
最後大概猜測,有可能是"本尊"馬立昇與詩詩在一起
但也有可能會是"被附身"的馬翰文與詩詩在一起
我猜後者配對迷會有點小不爽但反正臉沒變應該不會反彈
如果編劇為了不讓善良天真的江詩詩變心到本尊馬立昇身上
應該會選擇是"被附身"的馬翰文與詩詩在一起
如此一來,編劇既可以安撫配對迷的情緒還保有文詩的感情~
很完美吧~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.171.65.132
推
03/29 11:53, , 1F
03/29 11:53, 1F
→
03/29 11:55, , 2F
03/29 11:55, 2F
推
03/29 12:03, , 3F
03/29 12:03, 3F
→
03/29 12:04, , 4F
03/29 12:04, 4F
→
03/29 12:04, , 5F
03/29 12:04, 5F
→
03/29 12:14, , 6F
03/29 12:14, 6F
→
03/29 12:16, , 7F
03/29 12:16, 7F
→
03/29 12:18, , 8F
03/29 12:18, 8F
→
03/29 12:18, , 9F
03/29 12:18, 9F
推
03/29 12:19, , 10F
03/29 12:19, 10F
→
03/29 12:20, , 11F
03/29 12:20, 11F
→
03/29 12:21, , 12F
03/29 12:21, 12F
→
03/29 12:21, , 13F
03/29 12:21, 13F
→
03/29 12:25, , 14F
03/29 12:25, 14F
推
03/29 12:27, , 15F
03/29 12:27, 15F
→
03/29 12:28, , 16F
03/29 12:28, 16F
→
03/29 12:30, , 17F
03/29 12:30, 17F
→
03/29 12:33, , 18F
03/29 12:33, 18F
→
03/29 12:34, , 19F
03/29 12:34, 19F
→
03/29 12:35, , 20F
03/29 12:35, 20F
→
03/29 12:36, , 21F
03/29 12:36, 21F
→
03/29 12:47, , 22F
03/29 12:47, 22F
推
03/29 12:49, , 23F
03/29 12:49, 23F
→
03/29 12:50, , 24F
03/29 12:50, 24F
推
03/29 12:54, , 25F
03/29 12:54, 25F
→
03/29 12:55, , 26F
03/29 12:55, 26F
→
03/29 12:55, , 27F
03/29 12:55, 27F
→
03/29 13:08, , 28F
03/29 13:08, 28F
推
03/29 13:41, , 29F
03/29 13:41, 29F
→
03/29 13:49, , 30F
03/29 13:49, 30F
→
03/29 13:49, , 31F
03/29 13:49, 31F
→
03/29 13:50, , 32F
03/29 13:50, 32F
→
03/29 13:51, , 33F
03/29 13:51, 33F
推
03/29 13:54, , 34F
03/29 13:54, 34F
→
03/29 13:56, , 35F
03/29 13:56, 35F
→
03/29 13:57, , 36F
03/29 13:57, 36F
→
03/29 13:58, , 37F
03/29 13:58, 37F
推
03/29 14:06, , 38F
03/29 14:06, 38F
推
03/29 14:23, , 39F
03/29 14:23, 39F
推
03/29 15:45, , 40F
03/29 15:45, 40F
→
03/29 15:46, , 41F
03/29 15:46, 41F
推
03/29 17:11, , 42F
03/29 17:11, 42F
推
03/29 18:08, , 43F
03/29 18:08, 43F
→
03/29 18:41, , 44F
03/29 18:41, 44F
→
03/29 18:41, , 45F
03/29 18:41, 45F
推
03/29 19:13, , 46F
03/29 19:13, 46F
→
03/29 19:38, , 47F
03/29 19:38, 47F
推
03/29 19:42, , 48F
03/29 19:42, 48F
推
03/29 19:57, , 49F
03/29 19:57, 49F
→
03/29 19:58, , 50F
03/29 19:58, 50F
→
03/29 19:59, , 51F
03/29 19:59, 51F
推
03/29 20:00, , 52F
03/29 20:00, 52F
→
03/29 20:00, , 53F
03/29 20:00, 53F
→
03/29 20:12, , 54F
03/29 20:12, 54F
→
03/29 20:14, , 55F
03/29 20:14, 55F
→
03/29 20:15, , 56F
03/29 20:15, 56F
→
03/29 20:18, , 57F
03/29 20:18, 57F
→
03/29 20:19, , 58F
03/29 20:19, 58F
推
03/29 20:34, , 59F
03/29 20:34, 59F
→
03/29 20:37, , 60F
03/29 20:37, 60F
→
03/29 20:39, , 61F
03/29 20:39, 61F
→
03/29 20:41, , 62F
03/29 20:41, 62F
推
03/29 23:59, , 63F
03/29 23:59, 63F
→
03/30 09:08, , 64F
03/30 09:08, 64F
→
03/30 09:10, , 65F
03/30 09:10, 65F
→
03/30 09:11, , 66F
03/30 09:11, 66F
→
03/30 09:11, , 67F
03/30 09:11, 67F
→
03/30 09:11, , 68F
03/30 09:11, 68F
→
03/30 09:47, , 69F
03/30 09:47, 69F
推
03/30 14:21, , 70F
03/30 14:21, 70F
→
03/30 14:22, , 71F
03/30 14:22, 71F
→
03/30 15:28, , 72F
03/30 15:28, 72F
推
04/05 15:38, , 73F
04/05 15:38, 73F
→
08/17 15:42, , 74F
08/17 15:42, 74F
討論串 (同標題文章)