Re: [閒聊] Matyas Kuti is a CHEATER!!!

看板Rubiks作者 (--以上為智障名單--)時間16年前 (2008/02/12 00:05), 編輯推噓41(41042)
留言83則, 21人參與, 最新討論串2/4 (看更多)
(翻譯有錯請指正) Kuti是個作弊者!! 我發起這篇文因為我想讓大家知道他是個作弊者! 他所有的世界紀錄都是作弊的, 在2008 Belgian Open也作弊, 我可以用影片證明這一切, 他作弊的方式是 -站著解方塊 -解的時候將方塊靠近身體 -只把眼罩蓋在鼻子上方. 比賽進行中, 裁判員拿紙遮住方塊的時間, 通常只有幾秒而已. 雖然已經遮住, 但是作弊者還可以趁著作弊時的記憶繼續解方塊, 就算遮蔽個10~15秒, 裁判員還是無法知道作弊者只是反覆做著一些基本公式來裝忙. (例如 R U R' U'x4) ok, 我們再回來看Matyas, 最明顯的一次作弊就是他在多顆盲解項目, 在一次解15顆的過程, 他的解法出錯了, 請注意2:35秒~2:55秒的影片 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDsQ7NnhJKU
影片中的他, 在盲解過程中, 發現corner被打亂, 也試著解回來. 當他發現corner被打亂時, 他利用轉動方塊來觀察, 並解回來. 再來看看2008 Belgian Open, 他盲解10顆3x3, 裁判員沒有用紙阻擋在Matyas的頭跟方塊之間, 所以他可以輕而易舉的作弊, 但是, 當他解到第10顆方塊時, 我正好結束了另一個項目的裁判工作, 走到他身邊, 發現他的眼罩是蓋在他鼻子上, 我覺得他有可能作弊, 所以我拿了張紙擋在中間, 有了阻隔物之後, 他的手轉了一個公式, 然後一直停住, 開始思考, 接下來就DNF了. 平常的盲解也一樣, 我拿了張紙擋在中間, 他沒辦法作弊, 也就DNF了. 我的意思不是說他沒辦法在一分鐘內完成盲解, 我只是想說, 他在過程中有作弊, 我知道他有能力在一分鐘內完成盲解, 只是他對不起他自己創下的世界紀錄. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sSqbdCYUXw
嗯, 我能說什麼.. 他把眼罩放在鼻子上, 然後稍微往後拉一點, 當Robert(裁判員)把手放在他的眼睛跟方塊中間時, 他就停下來假裝思考, 為了不讓別人發現, 所以他用更多的思考時間來掩飾他作弊的行為. 在Czech Open的4x4盲解? 那一次是他的世界紀錄, 他做了一大堆沒用的轉動, 就像F2後再F2, 或是R U R' 或R U' R'之類的, 用來偷偷觀察R面跟D面的顏色. 嗯, 我不知道該說什麼了.... 如果他作弊, 請把他所有的世界紀錄頭銜刪除(盲解 clock magic 等等的) Milan Baticz : http://speedsolving.com/showthread.php?t=2842 //以下補上原文供高手對照 Matyas Kuti is a CHEATER!!! I started this topic because I want to show everyone that he is a cheater! He cheats all his WRs, he also cheated at Belgian Open(2008). I can prove that with videos. Let's start some tricks, which he use: - standing while solving - holding cube near the body - put blindfold ON nose, and not under nose There are judges who holds the paper between the cubers head and the cube, but hold it only for few seconds, so the solver can do the 1-2 alg which he saw while cheating. Or hold paper fot 10-15 seconds, but they can't recognize that the solver does nodo algs(for example (R U R' U')x4). OK. Let's continue with Matyas. The most seeable cheat was that he made a mistake while solving 15 cubes blindfolded. Watch this vid from 2:35 to 2:55. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDsQ7NnhJKU
You can recognize that he messed up corners, and tryed to solve them again. He stopped for some seconds, when he recognized that he messed up them, and turn cube around, the reason why he get know the moves which solve corners. Or watch videos from Belgian Open 08. He tried to solve 10 cubes blindfolded. The judge was not strick, didn't put the paper between Matyas's head and the cube, so he could easily cheat. But when he was solving his 10th cube, I finished my event, and went there, and recognize that his blindfold on his nose, and maybe he cheats. So I hold the paper to the right place, and he did 1 alg, and then started thinking, and DNFed. He couldn't solve that. Normal blindfolded solve: I holded the paper when he was solving, so he couldn't cheat, and DNFed. I don't want to say that he can't solve the cube blindfolded in 1 minute, I just want to say that he cheated. I KNOW that he can do it. But he cheated his WRs . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sSqbdCYUXw
Well, what can I say... he put blindfold on his nose, and then oushed it back up a little. And when Robert(judge) put his arm between his eyes and the cube, he stopped to think, and tryed to keep it secret that he cheated, so he thinked more. 4x4 BLD at Czech Open? That one was WR. He did a bunch of rotations, and did moves like F2 F2 or R U R' think R U' R' to see which colour is on R side or D side. Well, don't know what to say... If he is a cheater please delete all his records, all WRs(BLD records, clock, magic, ...). Milan Baticz -- ◣◢/ ████ ◤◥◥◥ 我喜歡玩方塊 ~ 科科 ** http://0rz.tw/622Er < ψmaviswang -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.169.143.148

02/12 00:07, , 1F
推翻譯
02/12 00:07, 1F

02/12 00:08, , 2F
被他這麼一說好像有一點說服力... 不過... 恩..
02/12 00:08, 2F

02/12 00:08, , 3F
辛苦你翻譯了
02/12 00:08, 3F

02/12 00:10, , 4F
02/12 00:10, 4F

02/12 00:19, , 5F
他說話有盲點 RUR'U'四次並不會復原,另外...
02/12 00:19, 5F

02/12 00:20, , 6F
重複F2之類的動作,有可能是思考或著轉錯= = ...
02/12 00:20, 6F

02/12 00:20, , 7F
另一方面 這位裁判他自己會盲解嗎 XD 純屬意見 ==
02/12 00:20, 7F

02/12 00:21, , 8F
另外問一下板上的盲解高手,不可能用轉動方塊恢復角的
02/12 00:21, 8F

02/12 00:22, , 9F
方向嗎@@? 假如是我就要閉嘴了 囧
02/12 00:22, 9F

02/12 00:25, , 10F
Milán Baticz是個很強的cuber
02/12 00:25, 10F

02/12 00:26, , 11F
Official Results BF3x3 1:43 OH3X3:16.75(s) 3x3:10.71
02/12 00:26, 11F

02/12 00:27, , 12F
原來是這樣 失敬了... 囧rz
02/12 00:27, 12F

02/12 00:28, , 13F
他也有一定的地位 也一定知道自己發這篇文章對自己的影響
02/12 00:28, 13F

02/12 00:30, , 14F
但他還是發了這篇文章 可見他對此的懷疑之大
02/12 00:30, 14F

02/12 00:37, , 15F

02/12 00:37, , 16F
這是Kuti整個solve都被遮住, 然後DNF的影片
02/12 00:37, 16F

02/12 00:38, , 17F
看來dale也加入求證的行列了XD
02/12 00:38, 17F

02/12 00:39, , 18F
我個人是相信kuti的, 只是把延伸閱讀列入推文中.
02/12 00:39, 18F

02/12 00:40, , 19F
大推dale的貼心!
02/12 00:40, 19F

02/12 00:41, , 20F
我怎看一看之後心裡毛毛的= =...
02/12 00:41, 20F

02/12 00:40, , 21F
沒事用那麼大的眼罩幹麻?
02/12 00:40, 21F

02/12 00:41, , 22F
跟我想的一樣欸 他眼罩貞的好大 而且真的都沒過鼻子..
02/12 00:41, 22F

02/12 00:42, , 23F

02/12 00:42, , 24F
4x4 被質疑太多無用轉動的那次
02/12 00:42, 24F

02/12 00:44, , 25F
其實 找鄭咩所有的盲解影片出來 然後 挑幾個DNF的來用
02/12 00:44, 25F

02/12 00:44, , 26F
也是有可能把鄭咩說成這樣 目前為止我覺得證據不足拉
02/12 00:44, 26F

02/12 00:46, , 27F
但是既然國外的能手發表這樣的文章 不難保KUTI受質疑的程度
02/12 00:46, 27F

02/12 00:47, , 28F
以及接下來 所有SLOVE都遮著一張紙....
02/12 00:47, 28F

02/12 00:47, , 29F
樓上是要北上了沒?
02/12 00:47, 29F

02/12 00:48, , 30F
感謝翻譯!辛苦了!
02/12 00:48, 30F

02/12 00:49, , 31F
你是要問我有沒有要去基隆嗎? 我已經在台北拉 寶貝
02/12 00:49, 31F

02/12 00:50, , 32F
他會不會從此不敢盲解阿= = (別揍我...)
02/12 00:50, 32F

02/12 00:50, , 33F
你不是說你禮拜二才回來
02/12 00:50, 33F

02/12 00:51, , 34F
如果他以後沒在盲解 那這樣反而才會被懷疑吧
02/12 00:51, 34F

02/12 00:52, , 35F
我看以後盲解可能要變成背後解了...
02/12 00:52, 35F

02/12 00:52, , 36F
A男嗎 XD
02/12 00:52, 36F

02/12 00:53, , 37F
搞不好KUTI 以後要去幹按摩的了...(賭神二經典台詞)
02/12 00:53, 37F

02/12 00:53, , 38F
星期二 是回中壢 但是聽說要變冷 不想回去中壢
02/12 00:53, 38F

02/12 00:54, , 39F
我沒事跑去只有5度的地方睡覺幹麻?
02/12 00:54, 39F

02/12 00:55, , 40F
02/12 00:55, 40F

02/12 00:56, , 41F
糖果哥的反應好鎮定 XDDDDDDDD
02/12 00:56, 41F

02/12 00:57, , 42F
要是PIKA能跟他一樣鎮定 就好
02/12 00:57, 42F

02/12 00:59, , 43F
PIKA... 好眼熟的ID..
02/12 00:59, 43F

02/12 01:01, , 44F
ES7不錯喔,不過有點夾眼鏡
02/12 01:01, 44F

02/12 01:01, , 45F
沒戴眼鏡長時間下來會比較輸湖 ...
02/12 01:01, 45F

02/12 01:04, , 46F
開箱文拉 MDB
02/12 01:04, 46F

02/12 01:04, , 47F
candyman.rubiks.tw/ES7.wmv
02/12 01:04, 47F

02/12 01:47, , 48F
水 讚 我準備要去幹過來聽
02/12 01:47, 48F

02/12 01:50, , 49F
淦。
02/12 01:50, 49F

02/12 02:29, , 50F
那個正個被遮住的影片,我也覺得可以懷疑........
02/12 02:29, 50F

02/12 02:30, , 51F
我乍看還以為是帶著鴨舌帽在轉...
02/12 02:30, 51F
※ 編輯: daleleu 來自: 118.169.143.148 (02/12 02:50)

02/12 03:25, , 52F
ES7我覺得滿夾的 = = 戴眼鏡的真的會痛
02/12 03:25, 52F

02/12 03:26, , 53F
不過我沒近視..對了你上次說ESW9要4個零 我們這邊不用
02/12 03:26, 53F

02/12 03:27, , 54F
引用國外cuber的建議 http://0rz.tw/4f3Fk
02/12 03:27, 54F

02/12 03:27, , 55F
ES7感覺需要包個膜比較安心 外出用的話..
02/12 03:27, 55F

02/12 04:45, , 56F
樓樓上 我笑了
02/12 04:45, 56F

02/12 06:18, , 57F
我不敢說kuti作弊,但有也不奇怪,虛名是很迷人的......?
02/12 06:18, 57F

02/12 08:29, , 58F
唉,只是方塊,何必呢。
02/12 08:29, 58F

02/12 12:56, , 59F
盲解看著解 不見的比閉著快阿
02/12 12:56, 59F

02/12 12:58, , 60F
原文的意思應該是不否認kuti的實力, 只是懷疑kuti利用
02/12 12:58, 60F

02/12 12:59, , 61F
作弊的方式來檢查過程是否有解錯, and 解完後是否成功
02/12 12:59, 61F

02/12 12:59, , 62F
同時也質疑之前kuti比賽近乎100%的成功率是因為偷看達成的
02/12 12:59, 62F

02/12 13:07, , 63F
以上只是解釋原文, 並非個人觀點 XD
02/12 13:07, 63F

02/12 13:07, , 64F
恩 不過看那26頁的討論 大家都還是覺得證據不足
02/12 13:07, 64F

02/12 13:08, , 65F
而且 都有透露出 只是方塊 有必要作弊嗎?的感覺
02/12 13:08, 65F

02/12 13:08, , 66F
是啊, 歪國人愛打嘴炮,真相kuti下次出賽之後, 就知道了.
02/12 13:08, 66F

02/12 13:16, , 67F
感覺是忍很久了 才終於說出來 不過證據不足 20萬元交保
02/12 13:16, 67F

02/12 13:23, , 68F
說不定他有初級的透視眼,只是看不清楚....
02/12 13:23, 68F

02/12 13:24, , 69F
↑純粹幻想式假設。但說不定有可能
02/12 13:24, 69F

02/12 13:32, , 70F
其實他有吃惡魔果食!!?
02/12 13:32, 70F

02/12 15:41, , 71F
其實他發動了"凝"...
02/12 15:41, 71F

02/12 15:59, , 72F
哦哦哦 出現了~~~~
02/12 15:59, 72F

02/12 17:25, , 73F
就是她(拍)
02/12 17:25, 73F

02/12 17:27, , 74F
如果真的有作弊的話, A男世界冠軍!!!!
02/12 17:27, 74F

02/12 17:28, , 75F
加油啦!!!
02/12 17:28, 75F

02/12 17:47, , 76F
希望看到kuti出來說明 ( ̄ー ̄;)
02/12 17:47, 76F

02/12 18:17, , 77F
【嘆】
02/12 18:17, 77F

02/12 19:12, , 78F
為什麼有白紙在前面他就要DNF.........
02/12 19:12, 78F

02/12 19:24, , 79F
懷疑如果真的有作弊 WCA要怎麼處置... 像美國禁藥風波一樣?
02/12 19:24, 79F

02/12 19:33, , 80F
那就 鞭數十,驅之別院吧。
02/12 19:33, 80F

02/12 19:41, , 81F
下次看他的比賽就一目了然了。
02/12 19:41, 81F

02/12 22:07, , 82F
久而不去,睨之...見其盲解成功8、9
02/12 22:07, 82F

02/12 22:09, , 83F
02/12 22:09, 83F
文章代碼(AID): #17i79a_a (Rubiks)
文章代碼(AID): #17i79a_a (Rubiks)