[外電] Grading Francisco Garcia
Grading Francisco Garcia
By Forrest Walker http://www.red94.net/grading-francisco-garcia/12652/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
He might have started his Rockets season as an afterthought in a trade, but
Francisco Garcia ended the season as something of a hero.
His prudent shooting and capable defense were surprise boons to a team
struggling to stay in the playoffs.
His experience and composure proved to be invaluable in the postseason most
never expected Houston to earn.
He may not even be on the roster next season,
but Garcia proved his value to the Rockets.
Francisco Garcia也許是因為一起多人交易案才有機會加入火箭隊的，
但他卻以有如一個英雄般的表現結束本季。
他精明的投射與足夠的防守能力是球隊在季後賽苦戰的一大亮點。
而在季後賽時，他無價的經驗與沉著的態度是火箭隊最沒有預想到的利多。
或許他下季不一定還會留在球隊，但他在火箭隊已經證明了自己的身價。
Discussion of Garcia must include discussion of Carlos Delfino, the other
veteran Rockets swingman on the bench.
When Garcia was acquired from the Sacramento Kings in a shocker of a trade,
rookie forward Thomas Robinson was the focus of discussion.
Carlos Delfino, however, felt the effects down the line, as Francisco Garcia
eventually established himself as a viable alternative at the wing.
Delfino made his living from the three point arc,
in line with the Rockets’ game plan.
Garcia, as a near carbon-copy of Delfino’s offensive game,
simply gave the Rockets another level of depth from deep.
既然要討論Garcia的表現，
那勢必要將球隊另一名板凳搖擺人老將Carlos Delfino一起比較。
當Garcia因一起驚人的交易從國王來到火箭時，大家都把焦點放在Thomas Robinson身上。
然而，當Garcia終於證明自己，也是另一名球隊在側翼球員的可用之兵時，
Delfino也因此受到影響。
因為Delfino是依靠在火箭隊的作戰計劃下的三分投射能力而生存的。
而Garcia則是在進攻端上與Defino非常雷同的球員，
讓火箭隊在外線火力支援上得到另一股助力。
While in Houston, Francisco Garcia shot 7.8 of his 10.7 field goal attempts
per 36 minutes from three point land, good for a total of 12.5 points.
His 41.4% shooting overall wasn’t much to sing about, but his 37.5% from
deep is plenty acceptable.
His peripherals were solid if not flashy per 36 minutes: 2.6 rebounds,
2.4 assists, 1.3 turnovers and 1.5 steals.
If this all sounds exactly like like Delfino’s numbers,
that’s because they are.
The only notable difference is that Delfino shot a little more
to make 15 points per 36 minutes and rebounded at the higher rate
of 4.3 per 36 minutes.
It’s remarkable how much these players overlapped in skill.
Garcia本季在火箭隊的PER36數據: 12.5Pts (平均10.7次出手，有7.8次來自三分。)
或許他的FG%-41.4%並不值得嘉許，但3PT%-37.5%卻是非常令人滿意的。
而其他的次要能力也是紮實的，PER36數據:2.6Rebs + 2.4Asts + 1.5Stls + 1.3Tos
Garcia與Delfino各方面的數據都看似非常相近。
而兩者間較有差異的就是: Delfino在PER36數據中平均多出手1.1次，多獲得2.1分。
多抓了2.1個籃板。
(*註: http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/HOU/2013.html )
這兩位球員在籃球技術上重疊的部份非常多，使人注目。
The first of two major differences, then,
comes on the opposite side of the ball.
Garcia surprised everyone with his remarkably adept defense of Kevin Durant
in the playoffs, giving head coach Kevin McHale opportunity to rest
Chandler Parsons and move him around on defense.
While not traditionally known for his defense while in Sacramento,
Garcia excelled in a system with Omer Asik in the paint.
Garcia showed why coaches love veterans; he stayed in his role and was willing
to play the defense his coach wanted. Why, then, might his days in Houston
be done?
兩位球員間最大的兩個差異點。
第一 : 防守能力。
Garcia在季後賽時，對位Durant所展現的老練防守能力，令大家刮目相看。
並且讓教練在調度上，能夠讓Chandler Parson有喘息的機會，
或是讓Parson去防守別的位置。
雖然Garcia過去在國王隊時，防守能力並不是大家認識他的焦點。
但在本季季後賽，Garcia在Aisk坐鎮禁區的防守系統裡有著優異的表現。
Garcia的表現，無疑地解釋了為什麼教練們偏好用老將球員們；
因為他襯職扮演自己所被賦予的角色，並且樂意去執行教練要求的方式去防守。
但，他跟火箭隊的緣分盡了嗎?
The second difference is the kicker.
Francisco Garcia’s $6.1 million this season and $6.4 million team option
next season mean that he’s unlikely to wear red next season.
It’s possible that he might negotiate a smaller contract with Houston,
but the Rockets have already expressed reluctance to pick up his option.
General manager Daryl Morey not only prizes long-term flexibility,
but needs to clear room to chase free agents in the short term.
第二 : 合約。
Garcia本季6.1M的合約，與下季6.4M的球隊選項合約，
讓他下季回到火箭隊的機會不大。
或許他可以跟火箭隊重談更低一點的合約價碼，
但火箭隊已經直接放棄他下季合約的球隊選項了。
總管Daryl Morey，以長期來看，除了重視球隊薪資空間的彈性外，
以短期來看，也必須清除一些空間來追求自由市場的球員。
What does this all mean, then? As an NBA player, Garcia is adequate.
He may be making an above-league-average six million per year on his
current contract, but that money had no effect on Houston’s short or
long term cap situation.
而這又代表暸什麼呢?
身為一個NBA球員，Garcia是能夠勝任的。
以他現在的合約狀況，他或許能夠領到平均高於聯盟水平的6M年薪，
但是這樣的薪水條件，不管以球隊長短期薪資狀況來看，
都不能幫助到火箭隊。
Garcia was expected to do little more than contribute a few bench minutes
and possibly add some veteran leadership.
Instead, the Rockets found a player who defended one of the best scorers
in the league, and is reportedly an invaluable locker room presence.
He may not have been a big part of the Rockets,
but he’s a part that would fit well going forward.
總結:
Garcia曾被期待只是比貢獻一些上場時間再多一點點，
並且有機會把他的老將的領導能力注入球隊。
他反而讓火箭隊找到一名能夠防守全聯盟最佳的得分手，
並且據說也是一名休息室內的無價精神領袖。
他或許並不是火箭隊很巨大的一塊拼圖，
但他的能力很適合火箭隊的長期發展。
Grade: C+
延伸閱讀: Player Report Cards: Francisco Garcia B http://0rz.tw/8dOfm
--
★Thanks for the ride, Houston Rockets 12-13★
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 211.20.239.247
推
05/27 16:20, , 1F
05/27 16:20, 1F
推
05/27 16:35, , 2F
05/27 16:35, 2F
→
05/27 16:39, , 3F
05/27 16:39, 3F
推
05/27 16:53, , 4F
05/27 16:53, 4F
推
05/27 17:14, , 5F
05/27 17:14, 5F
→
05/27 17:14, , 6F
05/27 17:14, 6F
→
05/27 18:19, , 7F
05/27 18:19, 7F
推
05/27 18:40, , 8F
05/27 18:40, 8F
推
05/27 18:45, , 9F
05/27 18:45, 9F
→
05/27 19:29, , 10F
05/27 19:29, 10F
推
05/27 19:35, , 11F
05/27 19:35, 11F
推
05/27 19:39, , 12F
05/27 19:39, 12F
推
05/27 19:41, , 13F
05/27 19:41, 13F
→
05/27 19:41, , 14F
05/27 19:41, 14F
推
05/27 19:45, , 15F
05/27 19:45, 15F
→
05/27 19:46, , 16F
05/27 19:46, 16F
→
05/27 19:47, , 17F
05/27 19:47, 17F
→
05/27 20:03, , 18F
05/27 20:03, 18F
推
05/27 20:06, , 19F
05/27 20:06, 19F
→
05/27 20:08, , 20F
05/27 20:08, 20F
→
05/27 20:08, , 21F
05/27 20:08, 21F
推
05/27 20:09, , 22F
05/27 20:09, 22F
→
05/27 20:10, , 23F
05/27 20:10, 23F
→
05/27 20:11, , 24F
05/27 20:11, 24F
→
05/27 20:12, , 25F
05/27 20:12, 25F
推
05/27 20:28, , 26F
05/27 20:28, 26F
→
05/27 20:57, , 27F
05/27 20:57, 27F
→
05/27 20:59, , 28F
05/27 20:59, 28F
→
05/27 21:00, , 29F
05/27 21:00, 29F
→
05/27 21:01, , 30F
05/27 21:01, 30F
推
05/27 21:07, , 31F
05/27 21:07, 31F
推
05/27 21:14, , 32F
05/27 21:14, 32F
→
05/27 21:14, , 33F
05/27 21:14, 33F
推
05/27 21:16, , 34F
05/27 21:16, 34F
→
05/27 21:17, , 35F
05/27 21:17, 35F
→
05/27 21:29, , 36F
05/27 21:29, 36F
推
05/27 21:43, , 37F
05/27 21:43, 37F
推
05/27 21:48, , 38F
05/27 21:48, 38F
→
05/27 21:50, , 39F
05/27 21:50, 39F
→
05/27 21:51, , 40F
05/27 21:51, 40F
推
05/27 21:56, , 41F
05/27 21:56, 41F
→
05/27 21:57, , 42F
05/27 21:57, 42F
推
05/27 22:02, , 43F
05/27 22:02, 43F
→
05/27 22:02, , 44F
05/27 22:02, 44F
→
05/27 22:03, , 45F
05/27 22:03, 45F
→
05/27 22:18, , 46F
05/27 22:18, 46F
→
05/27 22:21, , 47F
05/27 22:21, 47F
→
05/27 22:22, , 48F
05/27 22:22, 48F
→
05/27 22:23, , 49F
05/27 22:23, 49F
→
05/27 22:24, , 50F
05/27 22:24, 50F
→
05/27 22:28, , 51F
05/27 22:28, 51F
→
05/27 22:31, , 52F
05/27 22:31, 52F
→
05/27 22:32, , 53F
05/27 22:32, 53F
推
05/27 22:44, , 54F
05/27 22:44, 54F
→
05/27 22:45, , 55F
05/27 22:45, 55F
推
05/27 22:56, , 56F
05/27 22:56, 56F
→
05/27 22:57, , 57F
05/27 22:57, 57F
→
05/27 22:59, , 58F
05/27 22:59, 58F
→
05/27 23:02, , 59F
05/27 23:02, 59F
推
05/28 00:15, , 60F
05/28 00:15, 60F
→
05/28 00:16, , 61F
05/28 00:16, 61F
推
05/28 00:31, , 62F
05/28 00:31, 62F
→
05/28 00:31, , 63F
05/28 00:31, 63F
→
05/28 00:35, , 64F
05/28 00:35, 64F
推
05/28 00:36, , 65F
05/28 00:36, 65F
推
05/28 00:38, , 66F
05/28 00:38, 66F
→
05/28 00:38, , 67F
05/28 00:38, 67F
→
05/28 00:38, , 68F
05/28 00:38, 68F
推
05/28 00:38, , 69F
05/28 00:38, 69F
→
05/28 00:39, , 70F
05/28 00:39, 70F
→
05/28 00:39, , 71F
05/28 00:39, 71F
→
05/28 00:39, , 72F
05/28 00:39, 72F
→
05/28 00:41, , 73F
05/28 00:41, 73F
→
05/28 00:41, , 74F
05/28 00:41, 74F
→
05/28 00:42, , 75F
05/28 00:42, 75F
推
05/28 00:43, , 76F
05/28 00:43, 76F
→
05/28 00:44, , 77F
05/28 00:44, 77F
→
05/28 00:44, , 78F
05/28 00:44, 78F
→
05/28 00:44, , 79F
05/28 00:44, 79F
→
05/28 00:45, , 80F
05/28 00:45, 80F
→
05/28 00:45, , 81F
05/28 00:45, 81F
→
05/28 00:46, , 82F
05/28 00:46, 82F
→
05/28 00:47, , 83F
05/28 00:47, 83F
→
05/28 00:49, , 84F
05/28 00:49, 84F
→
05/28 00:49, , 85F
05/28 00:49, 85F
→
05/28 00:49, , 86F
05/28 00:49, 86F
→
05/28 00:50, , 87F
05/28 00:50, 87F
→
05/28 00:57, , 88F
05/28 00:57, 88F
推
05/28 00:58, , 89F
05/28 00:58, 89F
→
05/28 00:58, , 90F
05/28 00:58, 90F
→
05/28 00:59, , 91F
05/28 00:59, 91F
推
05/28 02:23, , 92F
05/28 02:23, 92F
推
05/28 07:47, , 93F
05/28 07:47, 93F
→
05/28 07:48, , 94F
05/28 07:48, 94F
推
05/28 14:59, , 95F
05/28 14:59, 95F
→
05/28 15:00, , 96F
05/28 15:00, 96F
→
05/28 15:01, , 97F
05/28 15:01, 97F
延伸閱讀: Player Report Cards: Francisco Garcia B http://0rz.tw/8dOfm
※ 編輯: KenRock 來自: 114.26.172.169 (06/01 11:54)