[轉錄][流言] Rockets have offer on table fo …
http://bbs.clutchfans.com/showthread.php?t=187250
http://bbs.hoopchina.com/1006/1330887.html
Marc Stein just reported on NBA TV, when they were talking about where Lebron
would land. Stein says that Golden State has been shopping the pick with
Randolph since the lottery. Stein says that the Warriors have fallen out of
love with Randolph after a public ongoing fued with head coach Don Nelson.
The Warriors appeared to have given up on 20 year old Randolph, and wouldn't
mind sending him to houston, with a proposed trade centered around 14th pick
from the rockets, 2012 knicks pick, and maybe a throw in player(not Aaron
brooks or Jordan Hill.) maybe a guy like Chase Budinger who has ties to the
California area, and who the Warriors are very high on. The only thing
keeping this swap from happening is that Daryl Morey still has hopes of
trying to acquire Chris Bosh, although he thinks its possible that Chris Bosh
becomes a Rocket, I have spoken too many gm's who have followed this free
agent class, and they believe the Knicks or Chicago is a destination he will
end up at, But one thing i have learned is to not count out Daryl Morey.
Marc Stein 在NBATV 談及Lebron 今夏去向的時候提到, 勇士在努力把6號簽和軟豆腐一
起打包叫賣。 Marc Stein 說勇士在軟豆腐和老尼公開爭執之後對軟豆腐不再抱有信心。
勇士不反對把他送到休士頓。目前提出的交易方案是:14號簽+紐約2012簽+某個平衡薪金
的球員(not brooks or hill) 換 6號簽+軟豆腐。據推測,該”不明球員“有可能是和
加州有歷史淵源,而且勇士也相當喜歡的布丁狗。
這個交易到目前還沒有達成的唯一原因是莫雷仍然希望先試著搶Chris Bosh. Marc
Stein 表示,儘管莫雷認為Bosh來火箭是有可能的,但是他和很多GM聊天時大家的感覺是
Bosh會去紐約或者芝加哥 -- 當然, 如果這幾年的交易記錄說明了什麼, 那就是永遠不
要小瞧莫雷。
As for why the Warriors want to trade down in the draft, many believe that a
player they like is paul george or gordon hayward. As for who the Rockets
would take, Daryl Morey would love for Cousins to fall in their lap at 6, but
it is highly unlikely that he does which is why Morey has not agreed to the
trade.
至於勇士隊往下交易的理由。。。 很多人相信他們喜歡的球員是Paul George 或者
Gordon Hayward (而用6號簽選他們高了。。。)。 至於火箭想選的人,莫雷很希望
Cousins 會掉到6號簽來,但是這個目前看來可能不大。 -- 這也是為啥莫雷還沒同意這
個交易的理由。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 202.175.121.106
推
06/02 11:55, , 1F
06/02 11:55, 1F
→
06/02 11:57, , 2F
06/02 11:57, 2F
推
06/02 13:05, , 3F
06/02 13:05, 3F
推
06/02 13:13, , 4F
06/02 13:13, 4F
→
06/02 13:23, , 5F
06/02 13:23, 5F
推
06/02 13:32, , 6F
06/02 13:32, 6F
推
06/02 13:39, , 7F
06/02 13:39, 7F
推
06/02 15:03, , 8F
06/02 15:03, 8F
推
06/02 15:10, , 9F
06/02 15:10, 9F
→
06/02 15:10, , 10F
06/02 15:10, 10F
推
06/02 15:15, , 11F
06/02 15:15, 11F
→
06/02 15:21, , 12F
06/02 15:21, 12F
→
06/02 15:22, , 13F
06/02 15:22, 13F
推
06/02 15:22, , 14F
06/02 15:22, 14F
推
06/02 15:50, , 15F
06/02 15:50, 15F
推
06/02 16:27, , 16F
06/02 16:27, 16F
推
06/02 16:39, , 17F
06/02 16:39, 17F
→
06/02 16:42, , 18F
06/02 16:42, 18F
推
06/02 17:53, , 19F
06/02 17:53, 19F
推
06/02 18:20, , 20F
06/02 18:20, 20F
推
06/03 00:06, , 21F
06/03 00:06, 21F
→
06/03 14:09, , 22F
06/03 14:09, 22F
→
06/03 14:10, , 23F
06/03 14:10, 23F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):