Re: [外電] hoopchina譯文﹕ESPN的Hollinger對此的 …

看板Rockets作者wxynod (虎紋貓)時間17年前 (2009/02/20 08:26)推噓7(7推 0噓 1→)

留言8則, 8人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)

換位思考﹐從魔術的角度來看。缺少一名先發控衛﹐現在找到了。以前還和教練有過合作﹐合作的不錯。後來又在教練師承同門的親兄弟手下打得有聲有色。他還有著和聯盟最佳中鋒合作的豐富經驗。有著魔術需要的三分球特長...... 更重要的是﹐僅用了一堆用不著的garbage player配上必然是末位的第一輪選秀權就換來了。天下還有比這更好康的事咩﹖ 反觀火箭﹐我不反對火箭做交易﹐但這個交易我完全看不懂思路。當然這是在火箭仍有想繼續好好打的前提下。現在就等Morey宣布一下這筆交易的意義吧。我也很想知道除了錢還能有什麼別的目的。順便﹐我想依著Alston的性格﹐到了魔術隊應該會爆出一些對火箭不滿的內幕吧。這樣我們也能了解火箭的更衣室到底是一種什麼狀態。有何暗流在湧動。綜合球隊經營者的話和更衣室的狀況應該就能大致的明白火箭隊未來的發展趨勢了。雖然我覺得其實趨勢現在就已經能看出來了......但是還是希望明明白白了解到。 ※ 引述《wxynod (虎紋貓)》之銘言： : [ESPN]數據王子John Hollinger在線聊天中對火箭交易的看法 : 由 uniquenew 發表在HoopChina‧火箭專區 http://www.HoopChina.com : Keith, Beijing(China): Why did Rocket abandon Rafer Alston for several garbage : players? : 火箭用阿爾斯通換這麼幾個垃圾球員做甚﹖ : John Hollinger: (3:16 PM ET ) Kyle Lowry isn't chopped liver -- he's a dynamite : defender. But he's better in a transition game and struggles in the halfcourt : , so that part of the equation is a bit odd. However, now Houston gets $3 : million in wiggle room with next year's tax line. : Kyle Lowry可不是小菜一碟──他是一名爆炸性的防守者。但他在攻防轉換的比賽中 : 表現更好﹐半場陣地戰則打得不順。因此交易中這一部分有點奇怪。但是﹐現在休斯 : 敦為明年又騰出了三百萬的薪金空間。 : ------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ------- : Dan (Chicago, IL): I think the Rockets won this trade: PG Kyle Lowry is better : than Alston. : 我覺得火箭這筆交易賺了﹕控衛Kyle Lowry比Alston更好。 : John Hollinger: (3:17 PM ET ) In a vacuum yes. I still want to see how Lowry : fits in there offensively though .. but it wouldn't be the first time they : 've had success with one of the Grizzlies' role players. : 不考慮其他因素時確實如此。盡管我還是想看看Lowry如何融入那裡的進攻……但火 : 箭已經有過成功運用灰熊角色球員的經驗了。 : ------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ------- : Dan [via inert]: If Stein's reported deal is accurate, wouldn't Orlando have : been better off just acquiring Lowry themselves? Also, the post says Cook : to Houston, not Memphis. : 如果Stein爆料成真﹐奧蘭多直接自己換來Lowry不是更好嗎﹖另外﹐報道說Cook是去 : 火箭﹐而不是灰熊。 : John Hollinger: (3:22 PM ET ) You are correct on Cook, and actually it would : have to be that way for the #s to work. So for Memphis it's basically Lowry : for a first. Interesting. I think Orlando wanted Alston more than Lowry : -- especially given his history with Stan VG. : Cook的消息你說的對﹐這筆交易隻能如此才能行得通。因此對灰熊而言﹐他們差不多 : 是用Lowry換了一個第一輪選秀權。有趣。我認為魔術更想要Alston而不是Lowry── : 尤其是考慮到他與大范甘迪曾經合作過。 : ------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ------- : Steve (Orlando): So How much does Alston add to the Magic? He's no Jameer : Nelson but he seems like a terrific upgrade from Johnson after last night : 's fiasco : 那麼Alston會給魔術帶來多少提升﹖他不是Jameer Nelson﹐但昨夜魔術慘敗後﹐他 : 看起來比Johnson可是升級了很多。 : John Hollinger: (3:28 PM ET ) Yes, at both ends. I think he guarantees Orlando : reaches the second round of the playoffs, and that added playoff dough is : important for a team that just had to borrow $10 million from the league : . : 對﹐球場兩端都是。我認為他可以保証魔術打進季後賽第二輪﹐這種增加的季後賽收 : 益﹐對一支剛剛向聯盟借了一千萬的球隊而言意義重大。 : ------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ------- : Mikey (Omaha): So what grades would you give for the Memphis, Houston, Magic : deals? : 那麼你給這三支球隊各打多少分﹖ : John Hollinger: (3:48 PM ET ) I'm thinking it over ... pretty high grade : for Rockets is my initial reaction, but I think there are some extra parts : in that deal that we're still finding out about (picks, secondary players : and such). : 我正在考慮……我第一反應會給火箭打很高的分﹐但我認為這筆交易還有一些其他部 : 分我們還要進一步搞清楚（選秀簽位﹐添頭球員等等）。 : ------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ------- : Manny (Dominican Republic): Your thoughts on Aaron Brooks as the new PG in : Houston? : 你覺得小黑豆打火箭的控球後衛會如何﹖ : John Hollinger: (3:48 PM ET ) Like him better off the bench -- I think Lowry : will be the starter. : 更喜歡他打替補──我認為Lowry會首發。 : ------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ------- : bob (north carolina): Is the Rockets trade a good trade? : 火箭這筆交易好嗎﹖ : John Hollinger: (3:58 PM ET ) Thinking about how long they've been trying : to get rid of Rafer and how little success they've had interesting buyers : ... and to get a young PG in return, even one who's kind of rough around : the edges? That's a really solid trade. : 想想他們多久以來一直試圖甩掉Rafer卻屢屢失敗……而且還能得到一名年輕控衛作 : 回報（即使是一名轉型遇到困難的球員）﹖這筆交易確實很穩健。 : ------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ------- : Tian. (Toronto): Do you think that Tmac might be the reason why Rockets gave : up Alston for another PG? : Tmac是不是火箭放棄Alston選擇另一位控衛的原因﹖ : John Hollinger: (4:00 PM ET ) Definitely. If Houston still thought it could : win the West it doesn't do this deal. Instead they look toward the future : with a Brooks-Lowry platoon. : 絕對是。如果火箭還認為他們能在西區奪冠﹐就不會做這筆交易了。他們著眼於Brooks : -Lowry輪班的未來。 : ------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ------- : Andrew (Portland, OR): If Jameer Nelson comes back before the playoffs does : the Alston deal make Orlando any more competitive for the championship. : 如果Jameer Nelson季後賽前歸來﹐Alston這筆交易是不是仍然讓魔術更有冠軍競爭 : 力﹖ : John Hollinger: (4:11 PM ET ) Yes -- he's still better than Anthony Johnson : . : 是──他依然比Anthony Johnson出色。 : [ 此帖被uniquenew在2009-02-20 05:32修改 ] -- 我隻是隻虎紋貓﹐身有虎紋實為貓﹗ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.243.117.96 ※ 編輯: wxynod 來自: 123.243.117.96 (02/20 08:31)

推

ronnie32

02/20 08:29, , 1^F

02/20 08:29, 1^F

推

EeLong

02/20 08:35, , 2^F

02/20 08:35, 2^F

推

jorden

02/20 08:48, , 3^F

02/20 08:48, 3^F