[新聞] Theo: 想用長約綁住Ellsbury

看板RedSox作者時間14年前 (2011/07/22 01:38), 編輯推噓73(73推 0噓 109→)
留言182則, 35人參與, 最新討論串1/1
BA OBP SLG OPS OPS+ Reddick .378 .432 .671 1.102 196 Gonzalez .343 .405 .563 .967 162 Ortiz .294 .381 .557 .938 153 Youkilis .281 .397 .494 .891 142 Ellsbury .316 .375 .509 .884 139 Pedroia .293 .398 .462 .860 135 Salty .249 .320 .452 .771 108 Varitek .234 .316 .404 .721 96 Scutaro .259 .332 .368 .700 92 Crawford .247 .280 .385 .666 80 Drew .223 .321 .309 .630 74 抱歉，有點洗版… http://goo.gl/hvHle Theo Epstein did an interview on WEEI this morning. There were three notable answers. On signing Jacoby Ellsbury long term: "Yeah, I think with all of our young players that we see as core members of our organization that is something we are interested in. We certainly see Jacoby as that. This certainly isn’t the right forum to talk about it as conversations are always between closed doors, but it is not a secret that we have sat down and tried in the past and tried to lock Jacoby up in the past, and we will sit down in the future and try and do it again at the appropriate time. He is somebody that we have believed in as a core, young member in the organization that we look to keep around. We have certain organizational standards that have to be met, and we have worked hard to keep those standards with Pedroia and Youkilis and Lesters of the world, so we’d love to one day announce that Jacoby will be with this organization for a long time and this is where he should be and we see him as a core guy." Translation: The Red Sox would need to buy back at least one year of free agency and have an option for another to make a deal with Ellsbury. Basically a contract for 2012, '13 and '14 (his first free agent year) with an team option for '15. Given that Ellsbury is represented by Scott Boras, good luck with that. On Josh Reddick: "You can’t deny what Josh Reddick is doing and you can’t deny that he’s a different player than he’s been. Josh Reddick has always had a world of talent. From the day we drafted him, the ball jumped off his bat as well as just about any player in our system. Always really athletic, always a really good outfielder, always a playmaker in the outfield, always a pretty dynamic baserunner. It was simply of question of Josh — and it always has been — improving his plate discipline. His swing mechanics, going up there with a plan, working the count, putting himself in a position where he could let that explosiveness of his bat play and let his natural instincts play out there in the batters box. "We’ve probably talked to Josh about it thousands of times over the years and it looks like a light has gone on for him. He’s a different guy and a really exciting piece, not for just this year but also the future. Tito makes out the lineup and I’m sure he’s going to have decisions to make on a nightly basis. I don’t want to speak for him, certainly Josh is someone who has helped us win games and you want to put him in a position to continue to do that." On who plays right field, Reddick or J.D. Drew: "I don’t think you have to cast your lot on one player and completely bury another. As I said, Tito’s job is to put the best team on the field on a given night to help us win. When you have one player performing so well, or so hot, maybe demonstrating that a light has gone on for him and another player who has struggled all year it’s something you have to really massage as a manager. "But we’ve always been an organization that has given the best players a chance to impact the game for our team on that given night. I know there’s been a lot of discussion on these airways, ‘Do this 100 percent. The other guy plays zero percent.’ That’s probably not how it’s going to be, but of course the players who are playing the best at the time get the chance to win a game for the Boston Red Sox." Translation: Starting in right field, for now anyway, Josh Reddick.＃ -- Year Age Tm G AB H HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ 1941 22 BOS 143 456 185 37 120 147 27 .406 .553 .735 235 1942 23 BOS 150 522 186 36 137 145 51 .356 .499 .648 217 1943–1945 n/a 二戰入伍 1946 27 BOS 150 514 176 38 123 156 44 .342 .497 .667 215 1947 28 BOS 156 528 181 32 114 162 47 .343 .499 .634 205 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.137.21.78 ※ 編輯: Orcish 來自: 220.137.21.78 (07/22 02:04)
推
07/22 05:06, , 1F
幾個感想關於Ellsbury的部分: 1.不擔心他今年是fluke嗎?
07/22 05:06, 1F
→
07/22 05:06, , 2F
2.經過去年的事情之後 總覺得他不會想留在紅襪了
07/22 05:06, 2F
→
07/22 05:07, , 3F
3.如果真的長約簽下來 底下一堆外野新秀真的哀鴻遍野
07/22 05:07, 3F
→
07/22 05:07, , 4F
尤其林哲瑄 幾乎在紅襪的路等於斷了
07/22 05:07, 4F
→
07/22 05:08, , 5F
補充一下2的部分 我覺得他不會想留在紅襪的原因是
07/22 05:08, 5F
→
07/22 05:09, , 6F
去年媒體罵他罵成這樣 也不見FO有什麼大動作替他辯護
07/22 05:09, 6F
→
07/22 05:09, , 7F
反而有點藉機弄臭他的感覺 現在看他打出來了 反過來要留
07/22 05:09, 7F
→
07/22 05:10, , 8F
純屬個人意見 去年的事情我算跟很久了......
07/22 05:10, 8F
推
07/22 05:22, , 9F
看了一下連結裡底下國外球迷的意見 大多也不看好
07/22 05:22, 9F
→
07/22 05:22, , 10F
關鍵字:波拉斯
07/22 05:22, 10F
推
07/22 06:38, , 11F
Boras最終還是要尊重客戶的意見,有CARGO的前例在也不
07/22 06:38, 11F
→
07/22 06:40, , 12F
是不可能,不過我也不看好能延長,跟他耗到30歲就要考慮
07/22 06:40, 12F
→
07/22 06:40, , 13F
考慮了
07/22 06:40, 13F
推
07/22 07:31, , 14F
我覺得不用急，明年還打得出來，要簽也不遲
07/22 07:31, 14F
推
07/22 08:03, , 15F
慢慢來阿，他離FA還有好幾年，能長久保持再簽也OK
07/22 08:03, 15F
推
07/22 08:14, , 16F
林哲瑄是不是知道這消息了? 所以今天2-2?
07/22 08:14, 16F
→
07/22 08:25, , 17F
我覺得至少會等到明年再看要不要簽長約吧，小帥哥離FA還
07/22 08:25, 17F
→
07/22 08:26, , 18F
有兩年，明年如果可以複製今年成績再來談也不遲
07/22 08:26, 18F
推
07/22 08:59, , 19F
Ellsubury還有兩年... power number能否維持是關鍵
07/22 08:59, 19F
推
07/22 09:51, , 20F
聖盾報仇成功 ㄐㄐ輸 爽！
07/22 09:51, 20F
推
07/22 09:54, , 21F
隔壁輸了 爽
07/22 09:54, 21F
推
07/22 10:04, , 22F
明天Lowell要回來開球!!!!
07/22 10:04, 22F
推
07/22 10:48, , 23F
波桑不是說今年不想談新的合約嗎?
07/22 10:48, 23F
推
07/22 11:16, , 24F
Lin打得出Jacoby這種成績嗎...更何況他還沒ready吧
07/22 11:16, 24F
→
07/22 11:17, , 25F
拜託不要跟一堆鄉民一樣整天"讓他升"
07/22 11:17, 25F
推
07/22 11:18, , 26F
Lin還有得練...
07/22 11:18, 26F
推
07/22 11:22, , 27F
墊底那兩支么壽貴
07/22 11:22, 27F
→
07/22 12:33, , 28F
除非Lin各項表現有相同水準 否則升上來也只是傷害
07/22 12:33, 28F
→
07/22 12:36, , 29F
我只在意紅襪可以更好 愛國心與台灣之光?!…
07/22 12:36, 29F
推
07/22 12:48, , 30F
打擊率再高一點的話上來當四號OF專任防守是沒有問題的啦
07/22 12:48, 30F
→
07/22 12:48, , 31F
但期待他取代或接替Ellsbury當先發CF只能說想太多了....
07/22 12:48, 31F
→
07/22 12:49, , 32F
期待他還不如期待Brentz快點上來，然後Crawford挪去CF
07/22 12:49, 32F
推
07/22 13:30, , 33F
但現實我們也不需要專任防守的咖，只需要右打platoon
07/22 13:30, 33F
→
07/22 13:44, , 34F
簡單說 一切看球隊需要和個人勝任能力 國籍毫無意義
07/22 13:44, 34F
→
07/22 13:45, , 35F
不要你的時候 還不就是一腳踢開
07/22 13:45, 35F
推
07/22 13:47, , 36F
這兩個交易出去比較實際 免得一群____來鬧版
07/22 13:47, 36F
推
07/22 13:53, , 37F
還可以陪公子練球阿
07/22 13:53, 37F
推
07/22 15:09, , 38F
去年新聞一堆匿名對Ellsbury的抱怨 都是來自球團
07/22 15:09, 38F
→
07/22 15:09, , 39F
現在說你想留下他? 難喔 不要去洋基就好了
07/22 15:09, 39F
還有 103 則推文
→
07/22 17:17, , 143F
反正去年簽下Crawford我就有心理準備了
07/22 17:17, 143F
→
07/22 17:18, , 144F
就這樣了 不說了 有何冒犯的地方 請見諒
07/22 17:18, 144F
推
07/22 17:21, , 145F
期待哪天林跟蔣球迷大戰
07/22 17:21, 145F
推
07/22 18:37, , 146F
樓上XD
07/22 18:37, 146F
推
07/22 18:44, , 147F
雖然很想看到樓樓上的大戰,可是有一個能上就不錯囉
07/22 18:44, 147F
推
07/22 19:52, , 148F
Youk是Cincinnati Bengals球迷(無誤)
07/22 19:52, 148F
推
07/22 20:10, , 149F
ELLS是純紅襪血耶 希望步要走
07/22 20:10, 149F
推
07/22 20:11, , 150F
樓上+1
07/22 20:11, 150F
推
07/22 20:32, , 151F
我也希望不要走~但別急著用CC這種約簽
07/22 20:32, 151F
推
07/22 22:04, , 152F
有可能換年輕的手臂嗎 如Bumgarner
07/22 22:04, 152F
推
07/22 22:08, , 153F
可以不要追川哥嗎!!感覺很不划算!!
07/22 22:08, 153F
推
07/22 22:28, , 154F
Theo如果真的為了川哥再把紅屌交易掉 那真的是...沒救了
07/22 22:28, 154F
推
07/22 23:49, , 155F
無論如何,我覺得拿川哥沒好處
07/22 23:49, 155F
推
07/22 23:57, , 156F
要換Beltran最好就是以吃薪資跟丟還可以的新秀為優先
07/22 23:57, 156F
→
07/22 23:58, , 157F
打工又沒arb何必丟快ready的新秀
07/22 23:58, 157F
→
07/22 23:59, , 158F
有錢能解決當然最好 利物浦都可以花那麼多買未證明的新秀
07/22 23:59, 158F
推
07/23 00:31, , 159F
買CC來 想留ELLS？我聽THEO在放屁
07/23 00:31, 159F
→
07/23 00:32, , 160F
倒覺得外野人才要換不是不可行 而是我們現在比較缺SP
07/23 00:32, 160F
→
07/23 00:34, , 161F
現在又想拿一堆即戰力的prospect換一個無關痛癢的位子
07/23 00:34, 161F
推
07/23 00:36, , 162F
我一直覺得很奇怪 CC生涯守CF場次非常少 04年以後幾乎
07/23 00:36, 162F
→
07/23 00:36, , 163F
是以LF為主了，怎麼好像很多人覺得紅襪準備把他移到CF去
07/23 00:36, 163F
推
07/23 00:37, , 164F
而鷹侠才21歲 把他換走有點太早的 不如換很雞肋的羅莉
07/23 00:37, 164F
推
07/23 00:38, , 165F
羅莉今年傷前打得很好啊，再給他點機會吧
07/23 00:38, 165F
→
07/23 00:38, , 166F
取代Ellsbury？雖然我也覺得Ellsbury可能不會留
07/23 00:38, 166F
→
07/23 00:39, , 167F
但是應該和CC無關吧？
07/23 00:39, 167F
→
07/23 00:39, , 168F
個人認為在芬威 守LF是誰都無所謂 倒是CC來之前的數據
07/23 00:39, 168F
→
07/23 00:41, , 169F
主要建立在於防守上 所以球團希望藉由他的移動能力來玩所
07/23 00:41, 169F
→
07/23 00:42, , 170F
謂的防守野球
07/23 00:42, 170F
→
07/23 00:43, , 171F
補充一下 我說的數據是指WAR
07/23 00:43, 171F
推
07/23 00:48, , 172F
外野 現在沒人可以再守CF就是了 (賣噹噹:......)
07/23 00:48, 172F
推
07/23 01:27, , 173F
為什麼搞的像已經要簽Beltan,CC已經像Theo身敗名裂了嗎
07/23 01:27, 173F
推
07/23 01:39, , 174F
照某些人發言的德性 CC不是早該槍斃自盡了嗎 >.^
07/23 01:39, 174F
推
07/23 01:47, , 175F
搞得(怎麼打錯字了= =
07/23 01:47, 175F
→
07/23 02:24, , 176F
CC再給他一點時間吧 而且 現實是 不給他時間也不行 ^^"
07/23 02:24, 176F
推
07/23 03:42, , 177F
CC 04年以後以LF為主是因為光芒CF有BJ吧
07/23 03:42, 177F
推
07/23 11:15, , 178F
No CC從上MLB開始就是專任LF了
07/23 11:15, 178F
推
07/23 12:23, , 179F
Lowrie應該是以後這幾年紅襪板凳的mainstay
07/23 12:23, 179F
推
07/23 12:27, , 180F
Lowrie的ceiling真的不算高 但是不痛痛的話好用
07/23 12:27, 180F
推
07/23 12:49, , 181F
打的到球的工具人很好用啊
07/23 12:49, 181F
推
07/23 13:58, , 182F
因為從上MLB開始光芒的中間不是有Baldelli就是有BJ啊....
07/23 13:58, 182F
‣ 更多 Orcish 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1EA6F-Ig (RedSox)