Re: [維尼] John Sickels 對Dice-K做的小預測
※ 引述《seekforever (sadnessflower)》之銘言:
: 這是用一種稱為Crystal Ball的預測方式
: 實際進行方法好像是找出大聯盟歷史上和這位選手相似的選手的生涯成績
: 加上一些統計方法弄出這些數據
: 據他自己的說法這是比預測更不精確但也比單純猜測來的嚴謹
: 這裡只節錄我們第一次簽下他的這六年
: 後面還有有興趣的可以自己看
: Year Age G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO W L ERA
: 2007 26 30 30 201 175 80 72 25 60 189 14 9 3.22
: 2008 27 32 32 229 201 91 80 27 56 204 20 8 3.14
: 2009 28 25 25 169 159 79 72 19 49 169 11 7 3.82
: 2010 29 33 33 239 202 92 81 24 57 246 19 10 3.05
: 2011 30 34 34 247 215 83 75 17 45 258 22 6 2.73
: 2012 31 29 29 189 178 86 83 24 43 169 13 12 3.95
: http://www.minorleagueball.com/main/3
比較今年的數據:
G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO W L ERA
預測 30 30 201 175 80 72 25 60 189 14 9 3.22
今年 32 32 204.2 191 100 100 25 80 201 15 12 4.40
看起來ERA 真的差很多每一場比預測多掉一分.另外很明顯的BB也是比預測多很多.
巧合的是BB 和 ERA 大概都是比預測多了 33% 左右.
其他的似乎都很準, 尤其是HR (orz... 所以今天的那一發是算準了)
假如照預測的方向走每年的BB大致上會往下調,如果是真的話應該很不錯,
相對的ERA應該也會降.這應該是估計松會慢慢地習慣MLB的球,還有裁判
的好球帶,然後降低BB吧(我猜).
不知道這樣的成績有沒有符合當初花大錢的期待?
p/s:個人覺得這樣的即戰力真的有幫到球隊,只是錢有點多就是了.還好可以期待.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.48.88
推
09/29 10:19, , 1F
09/29 10:19, 1F
→
09/29 10:20, , 2F
09/29 10:20, 2F
→
09/29 10:20, , 3F
09/29 10:20, 3F
推
09/29 10:21, , 4F
09/29 10:21, 4F
推
09/29 10:22, , 5F
09/29 10:22, 5F
推
09/29 10:22, , 6F
09/29 10:22, 6F
→
09/29 10:22, , 7F
09/29 10:22, 7F
→
09/29 10:22, , 8F
09/29 10:22, 8F
→
09/29 10:23, , 9F
09/29 10:23, 9F
→
09/29 10:23, , 10F
09/29 10:23, 10F
→
09/29 10:23, , 11F
09/29 10:23, 11F
→
09/29 10:23, , 12F
09/29 10:23, 12F
→
09/29 10:24, , 13F
09/29 10:24, 13F
→
09/29 10:24, , 14F
09/29 10:24, 14F
→
09/29 10:24, , 15F
09/29 10:24, 15F
→
09/29 10:25, , 16F
09/29 10:25, 16F
→
09/29 10:26, , 17F
09/29 10:26, 17F
推
09/29 10:27, , 18F
09/29 10:27, 18F
→
09/29 10:27, , 19F
09/29 10:27, 19F
→
09/29 10:27, , 20F
09/29 10:27, 20F
推
09/29 10:27, , 21F
09/29 10:27, 21F
→
09/29 10:28, , 22F
09/29 10:28, 22F
→
09/29 10:29, , 23F
09/29 10:29, 23F
推
09/29 10:29, , 24F
09/29 10:29, 24F
→
09/29 10:29, , 25F
09/29 10:29, 25F
→
09/29 10:29, , 26F
09/29 10:29, 26F
→
09/29 10:30, , 27F
09/29 10:30, 27F
→
09/29 10:30, , 28F
09/29 10:30, 28F
→
09/29 10:30, , 29F
09/29 10:30, 29F
→
09/29 10:30, , 30F
09/29 10:30, 30F
→
09/29 10:31, , 31F
09/29 10:31, 31F
→
09/29 10:31, , 32F
09/29 10:31, 32F
→
09/29 10:31, , 33F
09/29 10:31, 33F
推
09/29 10:32, , 34F
09/29 10:32, 34F
→
09/29 10:33, , 35F
09/29 10:33, 35F
→
09/29 10:33, , 36F
09/29 10:33, 36F
→
09/29 10:33, , 37F
09/29 10:33, 37F
→
09/29 10:33, , 38F
09/29 10:33, 38F
→
09/29 10:36, , 39F
09/29 10:36, 39F
推
09/29 10:36, , 40F
09/29 10:36, 40F
推
09/29 10:39, , 41F
09/29 10:39, 41F
→
09/29 10:39, , 42F
09/29 10:39, 42F
→
09/29 10:42, , 43F
09/29 10:42, 43F
推
09/29 10:45, , 44F
09/29 10:45, 44F
→
09/29 10:46, , 45F
09/29 10:46, 45F
→
09/29 10:46, , 46F
09/29 10:46, 46F
→
09/29 10:47, , 47F
09/29 10:47, 47F
推
09/29 10:48, , 48F
09/29 10:48, 48F
→
09/29 10:48, , 49F
09/29 10:48, 49F
推
09/29 10:58, , 50F
09/29 10:58, 50F
推
09/29 11:14, , 51F
09/29 11:14, 51F
推
09/29 11:54, , 52F
09/29 11:54, 52F
推
09/29 12:02, , 53F
09/29 12:02, 53F
→
09/29 12:02, , 54F
09/29 12:02, 54F
→
09/29 12:02, , 55F
09/29 12:02, 55F
→
09/29 12:03, , 56F
09/29 12:03, 56F
→
09/29 12:03, , 57F
09/29 12:03, 57F
推
09/29 12:05, , 58F
09/29 12:05, 58F
→
09/29 12:07, , 59F
09/29 12:07, 59F
推
09/29 12:12, , 60F
09/29 12:12, 60F
推
09/29 12:22, , 61F
09/29 12:22, 61F
推
09/29 12:35, , 62F
09/29 12:35, 62F
推
09/29 13:13, , 63F
09/29 13:13, 63F
→
09/29 13:13, , 64F
09/29 13:13, 64F
推
09/29 18:09, , 65F
09/29 18:09, 65F
推
09/29 18:30, , 66F
09/29 18:30, 66F
→
09/29 19:20, , 67F
09/29 19:20, 67F
推
09/29 21:43, , 68F
09/29 21:43, 68F
→
09/29 21:44, , 69F
09/29 21:44, 69F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):