Re: [PR. ] All Stars 106
下面有雷
高分組
Jerell(獲勝)
Kenley
Mila
Kara
低分組
Michael C.
Mondo
Austin
Rami(淘汰)
作品照好閱讀版:http://ppt.cc/KFOe
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.225.147.181
→
02/10 14:19, , 1F
02/10 14:19, 1F
推
02/10 14:25, , 2F
02/10 14:25, 2F
→
02/10 14:26, , 3F
02/10 14:26, 3F
推
02/10 14:28, , 4F
02/10 14:28, 4F
推
02/10 14:29, , 5F
02/10 14:29, 5F
→
02/10 14:30, , 6F
02/10 14:30, 6F
→
02/10 14:32, , 7F
02/10 14:32, 7F
→
02/10 16:19, , 8F
02/10 16:19, 8F
推
02/10 16:48, , 9F
02/10 16:48, 9F
→
02/10 16:49, , 10F
02/10 16:49, 10F
推
02/10 18:01, , 11F
02/10 18:01, 11F
→
02/10 18:04, , 12F
02/10 18:04, 12F
→
02/10 18:04, , 13F
02/10 18:04, 13F
我一直在想Kenley到底是為什麼一直鬼打牆的做圓點並且簡單的設計
會不會是因為在第五季她其實風格還不夠鮮明,而且還被質疑過抄襲
比較跳出來的大概是復古元素加上一點甜美
在第五季決賽
Kenley系列率先被淘汰的主因就是設計不夠清晰,不夠連串
所以這次她就像Rami一樣都替自己設好一個方向
Rami是到淘汰打死都不垂墜
Kenley則想以這種風格走完整季吧(一切都是臆測啊
→
02/10 18:14, , 14F
02/10 18:14, 14F
→
02/10 18:16, , 15F
02/10 18:16, 15F
→
02/10 18:17, , 16F
02/10 18:17, 16F
※ 編輯: kidpepes 來自: 61.225.147.181 (02/10 18:21)
推
02/10 18:21, , 17F
02/10 18:21, 17F
推
02/10 18:24, , 18F
02/10 18:24, 18F
推
02/10 19:32, , 19F
02/10 19:32, 19F
→
02/10 19:33, , 20F
02/10 19:33, 20F
推
02/10 20:07, , 21F
02/10 20:07, 21F
推
02/10 20:39, , 22F
02/10 20:39, 22F
推
02/10 20:43, , 23F
02/10 20:43, 23F
推
02/10 20:50, , 24F
02/10 20:50, 24F
→
02/10 20:51, , 25F
02/10 20:51, 25F
推
02/10 20:59, , 26F
02/10 20:59, 26F
→
02/10 21:01, , 27F
02/10 21:01, 27F
→
02/10 21:08, , 28F
02/10 21:08, 28F
推
02/10 21:37, , 29F
02/10 21:37, 29F
→
02/10 21:38, , 30F
02/10 21:38, 30F
推
02/10 21:40, , 31F
02/10 21:40, 31F
推
02/10 22:17, , 32F
02/10 22:17, 32F
推
02/10 22:28, , 33F
02/10 22:28, 33F
推
02/10 23:24, , 34F
02/10 23:24, 34F
推
02/11 00:03, , 35F
02/11 00:03, 35F
→
02/11 00:43, , 36F
02/11 00:43, 36F
→
02/11 00:44, , 37F
02/11 00:44, 37F
推
02/11 00:48, , 38F
02/11 00:48, 38F
推
02/11 00:54, , 39F
02/11 00:54, 39F
→
02/11 00:54, , 40F
02/11 00:54, 40F
→
02/11 00:54, , 41F
02/11 00:54, 41F
→
02/11 00:54, , 42F
02/11 00:54, 42F
→
02/11 00:55, , 43F
02/11 00:55, 43F
→
02/11 00:56, , 44F
02/11 00:56, 44F
→
02/11 00:57, , 45F
02/11 00:57, 45F
→
02/11 00:58, , 46F
02/11 00:58, 46F
→
02/11 02:01, , 47F
02/11 02:01, 47F
推
02/11 09:50, , 48F
02/11 09:50, 48F
推
02/11 13:29, , 49F
02/11 13:29, 49F
推
02/12 02:40, , 50F
02/12 02:40, 50F
推
02/12 10:55, , 51F
02/12 10:55, 51F
→
02/12 10:57, , 52F
02/12 10:57, 52F
推
02/14 13:41, , 53F
02/14 13:41, 53F
→
02/14 13:47, , 54F
02/14 13:47, 54F
→
02/14 13:48, , 55F
02/14 13:48, 55F
推
02/14 16:48, , 56F
02/14 16:48, 56F
推
02/14 18:40, , 57F
02/14 18:40, 57F
推
02/15 12:51, , 58F
02/15 12:51, 58F
→
02/15 12:52, , 59F
02/15 12:52, 59F
推
02/28 01:56, , 60F
02/28 01:56, 60F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):