Re: [討論] 犀利的interview

看板Realityshow作者nopeeking (Down Under)時間18年前 (2006/01/26 23:54)推噓9(9推 0噓 3→)

留言12則, 7人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

如果大家有看過Carolyn的interview的話，會發現其實一般Task在BoardRoom裡面，不是像剪接一樣只有十分鐘這樣短而已。以下節錄自Carolyn接受NBC的訪問(貼在Season 3 的網站) Question: Carolyn, what has surprised you most about the female candidates on The Apprentice? It seems they've evolved into more aggressive types as the show has progressed. Would you agree? Answer: I've been told that I've come across a little harsher towards the women. I don't think I've changed. I think the candidates have changed. It was definitely a new breed [on Season 2] and I found them very different from the first season's group. They were a little cutthroat and to a degree, that's okay. But they seemed to concentrate more so on pointing fingers than on actual facts. I found [the season two] group a little more exhausting than the first group. The first group had one- or two-hour boardrooms, now we seem to be going three to five hours! I don't see too many people taking blame for errors they've made. I hear a lot of long-winded comments and excuses. But I will say, I think all the candidates as a whole are dynamic people. I think they're strong people. I think they're very intelligent people. The circumstances are tough. They have little sleep; they're in tight quarters. 供大家做參考，其實他們是很嚴謹在選人的，第二季甚至進行三到五個小時！所以其實檯面下到底剪掉了多少的互動，我們也不清楚，說不定我們想過的解圍方法 Candidates都用過了。所以大家不要對Candidates太失望啦 XD 畢竟每個都是從百萬個履歷表給挑出來的等級呀～(不過我懷疑節目當局也是會故意挑一些相當戲劇性的角色來參與interviews) ※ 引述《lipse (High and Dry)》之銘言： : 今天這集雖然主要的重點在最後Jen和Kelly的對決， : 但之前的4位高階主管的interview也讓我大開眼界， : 這幾位問到一些很犀利的問題，針對每位參賽者的表現，也都 : 能夠提出一針見血的的評論。 : 實在很佩服他們能在這麼短的時間，幾個問答中，就可以視出每位成員的特質， : 也都針對企業界最需要的特點提出重要的問題，真不愧是頂尖業界的主管， : 識人能力了得... : 老實說，那些問題要我在不到一秒內回答出，還真困難... : 看完影片中的interview，對我自己未來就業可能要面對的挑戰， : 或interview時需要準備的幾個議題，有更清楚的方向! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.115.2.71

推

okfee

01/27 00:08, , 1^F

01/27 00:08, 1^F

推

deanlin

01/27 00:15, , 2^F

01/27 00:15, 2^F

→

deanlin

01/27 00:16, , 3^F

01/27 00:16, 3^F