Re: [心得] DA2全破心得(雷劇情)
說到K城的未來潛在危機......(有DA2大雷)
以下是個人主觀意見
最終戰前的選擇時,我有點不欣賞王子。
對於他頓失親人一般的Elthina的忿怒我能理解,於情於理於法Anders當然
要死......但為什麼Sebastian沒有自己動手?這一直是我感到疑惑之處,以當
下的情況我想他拿起爺爺的弓射死Anders很合理吧XD
(有沒有弓手的禮物都是爺爺的弓的八卦......)
結果決定權交給Hawke,而Hawke決定不殺Anders時,他的第一反應是大怒,(廢話)
指責Hawke包庇兇手、Kirkwall沒正義沒天理啊(說的好)......然後就說他要帶
兵回來血洗Kirkwall,給Hawke看看什麼叫正義?
這裡的鋪陳或許是為了之後Free Marches的衝突事件編排的,但還是讓人覺
得S王子的反應太過了點。Anders就坐在那裡,他可以自己動手;再來,他如果像
他自己說得那樣要帶兵攻打Kirkwall,那他所做的事情其實也只是報復罷了,死
的還是老百姓。這傢伙果然沒聽進過Elthina的話嘛:Death is never justice.
想報仇,請自便,但不要因為盛怒把別人扯進來。
(私心希望這傢伙是可以用理性說服的,雖然以他七年來的表現看來他不是
這種人......)
不過換個角度想,即使Anders那時候死了,S王子也滿意了,Kirkwall應該還
是死定了。政治和宗教都陷入嚴重失序狀況,看來S王子遲早還是會回去帶兵,只
不過不是報復,而是來「維持秩序」。反正就算他不來,Free Marches也有別的
城邦。Kirkwall風水一定不太好,一堆在Ferelden還很正常的人來這裡都會開始做
蠢事......
--
Sigrun: Can you set that bush on fire?
Anders: Probably, but why would I want to?
Sigrun: Could you freeze it?
Anders: Why do you want me to kill the bush?
Sigrun: Because it's there! It's an evil bush! Do it!
Anders: Magic isn't for your amusement! Why don't I just do a little dance?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 1.160.24.214
→
03/29 22:53, , 1F
03/29 22:53, 1F
推
03/29 23:11, , 2F
03/29 23:11, 2F
→
03/29 23:11, , 3F
03/29 23:11, 3F
→
03/29 23:12, , 4F
03/29 23:12, 4F
→
03/29 23:13, , 5F
03/29 23:13, 5F
→
03/29 23:14, , 6F
03/29 23:14, 6F
→
03/29 23:14, , 7F
03/29 23:14, 7F
→
03/29 23:14, , 8F
03/29 23:14, 8F
→
03/29 23:15, , 9F
03/29 23:15, 9F
→
03/29 23:15, , 10F
03/29 23:15, 10F
→
03/29 23:21, , 11F
03/29 23:21, 11F
→
03/29 23:22, , 12F
03/29 23:22, 12F
→
03/29 23:22, , 13F
03/29 23:22, 13F
推
03/29 23:23, , 14F
03/29 23:23, 14F
→
03/29 23:23, , 15F
03/29 23:23, 15F
→
03/29 23:24, , 16F
03/29 23:24, 16F
→
03/29 23:25, , 17F
03/29 23:25, 17F
→
03/29 23:26, , 18F
03/29 23:26, 18F
→
03/29 23:26, , 19F
03/29 23:26, 19F
→
03/29 23:26, , 20F
03/29 23:26, 20F
→
03/29 23:26, , 21F
03/29 23:26, 21F
→
03/29 23:28, , 22F
03/29 23:28, 22F
→
03/29 23:29, , 23F
03/29 23:29, 23F
推
03/29 23:30, , 24F
03/29 23:30, 24F
→
03/29 23:31, , 25F
03/29 23:31, 25F
→
03/29 23:31, , 26F
03/29 23:31, 26F
→
03/29 23:31, , 27F
03/29 23:31, 27F
推
03/29 23:32, , 28F
03/29 23:32, 28F
→
03/29 23:33, , 29F
03/29 23:33, 29F
→
03/29 23:34, , 30F
03/29 23:34, 30F
推
03/29 23:35, , 31F
03/29 23:35, 31F
→
03/29 23:36, , 32F
03/29 23:36, 32F
推
03/29 23:40, , 33F
03/29 23:40, 33F
推
03/29 23:40, , 34F
03/29 23:40, 34F
→
03/29 23:40, , 35F
03/29 23:40, 35F
推
03/29 23:50, , 36F
03/29 23:50, 36F
→
03/29 23:51, , 37F
03/29 23:51, 37F
推
03/29 23:56, , 38F
03/29 23:56, 38F
推
03/30 00:06, , 39F
03/30 00:06, 39F
→
03/30 00:17, , 40F
03/30 00:17, 40F
→
03/30 18:48, , 41F
03/30 18:48, 41F
→
03/30 20:28, , 42F
03/30 20:28, 42F
→
03/30 20:41, , 43F
03/30 20:41, 43F
→
03/30 20:43, , 44F
03/30 20:43, 44F
→
03/30 20:43, , 45F
03/30 20:43, 45F
→
03/30 20:44, , 46F
03/30 20:44, 46F
→
03/30 20:55, , 47F
03/30 20:55, 47F
→
03/30 20:59, , 48F
03/30 20:59, 48F
→
03/30 21:12, , 49F
03/30 21:12, 49F
→
03/30 21:12, , 50F
03/30 21:12, 50F
→
03/30 21:23, , 51F
03/30 21:23, 51F
推
03/30 21:35, , 52F
03/30 21:35, 52F
→
03/30 21:38, , 53F
03/30 21:38, 53F
→
03/30 21:39, , 54F
03/30 21:39, 54F
→
03/30 22:14, , 55F
03/30 22:14, 55F
→
03/30 23:00, , 56F
03/30 23:00, 56F
→
03/30 23:02, , 57F
03/30 23:02, 57F
→
03/30 23:25, , 58F
03/30 23:25, 58F
推
03/31 09:48, , 59F
03/31 09:48, 59F
→
03/31 10:56, , 60F
03/31 10:56, 60F
推
04/02 22:57, , 61F
04/02 22:57, 61F
→
04/02 22:58, , 62F
04/02 22:58, 62F
→
04/02 22:59, , 63F
04/02 22:59, 63F
推
04/03 00:29, , 64F
04/03 00:29, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):