[情報] ESPN: 10 best free-agent fits
http://0rz.tw/9NeEd (需要有 ESPN Insdier 帳號)
2. Tyson Chandler -- Toronto Raptors
Chandler could decide to return to the Mavericks, but he could also choose to
follow Dwane Casey from the Dallas Mavericks' bench to Toronto. Casey, the
newly hired Raptors head coach, was the defensive guru behind the Mavericks'
wall that stifled the Los Angeles Lakers and the Miami Heat en route to a
title.
Chandler flourished as the anchor to Casey's system, and the Raptors have the
cash to offer the center big money. Of course, Dallas owner Mark Cuban
notoriously breaks the bank for his centers, so there's a good chance
Chandler will defend the title. However, a Casey and Chandler connection
would be ideal for Toronto.
大意是說，Chandler 是幫助小牛奪冠的關鍵之一，但是 Dwane Casey 的防守系統也幫了
很大的忙。如果 Chandler 選擇不留在小牛隊，Casey 或許能夠幫忙把他挖過來。
7. Rodney Stuckey (R) -- Toronto Raptors
If you go strictly by points per game, Stuckey endured a down season in
2010-11, but a closer look at his campaign actually reveals a dramatic step
forward. By trimming the fat in his shot selection, he posted easily the best
true shooting percentage of his career and became a better distributor as a
floor general.
If the Pistons decide to hand over the keys to draftee Brandon Knight, they
could cut ties with Stuckey and let him walk. It would save the bloated
franchise some cash, but it's not a good bet that Knight will ever match
Stuckey's 18.4 player efficiency rating in 2010-11. If Tyson Chandler returns
to Dallas, the Raptors should focus their energy on nabbing a point guard for
the long haul. Remember, at 25, Stuckey is just entering his prime.
Stuckey 去年是有進步的，尤其在 true shooting percentag 和場上分球的部分。如果
底特律認為新人 Brandon Knight 是未來的控球後衛，那麼 Stuckey 就會離開。而暴龍
剛好需要一個未來的控球，尤其 Stuckey 才 25 歲，未來可期。
心得：不管怎樣，不要再讓 Bargnani 打中鋒就好了。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.250.40.37
推
11/29 17:43, , 1F
11/29 17:43, 1F
→
11/29 17:43, , 2F
11/29 17:43, 2F
→
11/29 19:30, , 3F
11/29 19:30, 3F
推
11/29 21:08, , 4F
11/29 21:08, 4F
推
11/30 17:21, , 5F
11/30 17:21, 5F
推
12/01 17:14, , 6F
12/01 17:14, 6F
→
12/01 17:16, , 7F
12/01 17:16, 7F
推
12/01 22:49, , 8F
12/01 22:49, 8F
→
12/02 01:16, , 9F
12/02 01:16, 9F
→
12/02 01:16, , 10F
12/02 01:16, 10F
推
12/02 08:20, , 11F
12/02 08:20, 11F