[轉錄][外電] 條子即將跟吹哥達成合約?

看板Rangers作者 (阿北)時間13年前 (2011/01/03 17:32), 編輯推噓6(6推 0噓 7→)
留言13則, 5人參與, 4年前最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
※ [本文轉錄自 MLB 看板 #1D8JLhzN ] 作者: betadu (正直有為電鋸弟弟) 看板: MLB 標題: [外電] 條子即將跟吹哥達成合約? 時間: Mon Jan 3 10:33:12 2011 http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2011/01/rangers-still-talking-to-beltre.html Rangers Near Deal With Adrian Beltre By Steve Adams [January 2, 2011 at 6:52pm CST] 6:52pm: Enrique Rojas of ESPN Deportes reports that the two sides are close to agreeing to a deal (link in Spanish). An agreement "appears imminent" according to one of Rojas' sources, while another tells him it will "probably" be a five-year contract with an option for 2016. SI.com's Jon Heyman tweets that nothing is done, but "there appears to be some hope." Jeff Wilson of The Fort Worth Star-Telegram echoes Heyman's report (Twitter link). 3:14pm: While the two sides have no deal in place, the Rangers remain in contact with Adrian Beltre, writes Jon Paul Morosi of FOX Sports. Morosi and Evan Grant of the Dallas Morning News (Twitter link) have both shot down a report out of the Dominican Republic earlier today that said the Rangers had signed Beltre to a six-year deal. With Michael Young, Elvis Andrus, and Ian Kinsler all entrenched in the Texas infield, it would seem an unlikely match at first. However, the Rangers had some discussions at the Winter Meetings about sending Young to multiple teams, and this is far from the first time we've seen them linked to Beltre. Young could also be shifted into a designated hitter role in the event of a Beltre signing. As WEEI.com's Alex Speier points out, Texas landing Beltre would represent a best case scenario for the Red Sox, as the Rangers' first round pick is unprotected, while other suitors such as the A's and Angels would only net Boston a second-round selection. In a poll just before New Year's, 11.55% of the near-12,000 MLBTR readers who voted thought Beltre would land in Texas. According to Morosi, Scott Boras is seeking a five-year deal worth at least $85MM for his client, which is on par with ESPN's Buster Olney's take in late December. Despite ongoing discussions with the Rangers, Morosi says the Angels are still viewed as the favorite to land Beltre. Boras先前放話絕不接受5年85MM以下 現在的消息是條子可能簽的是五年約加第六年選擇權 至於詳細金額還不清楚 另外也有說到Young的位置可能很尷尬 有可能被轉去DH或是交易 -- “I know they don’t like the Yankees to win, not even in Nintendo games. And knowing that I am part of Boston, I consider myself a Bostonian . . . I’m pretty sure that every Boston fan out there can feel proud that I’m going to try to beat the Yankees, and I’m going to give just the same effort I always did for them. They’re special fans, and they will always have my respect.’ 2009 WS The night before G6 Pedro Martinez -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.160.165.47 ※ 編輯: betadu 來自: 118.160.165.47 (01/03 10:37)
推
01/03 10:38,
後面幾年就不期不待了
01/03 10:38
推
01/03 10:38,
吹哥又可以休息好幾年了
01/03 10:38
※ 編輯: betadu 來自: 118.160.165.47 (01/03 10:40)
推
01/03 11:22,
Arlington的話還是可以樂觀點吧
01/03 11:22
推
01/03 11:35,
在阿靈頓也很難打的差吧 能補3B的守備也不錯
01/03 11:35
推
01/03 11:38,
沒有mike young的遊騎兵...
01/03 11:38
→
01/03 12:08,
現在遊騎兵的臉 逐漸移到MVP了吧
01/03 12:08
→
01/03 12:14,
MICHAEL YOUNG他在三壘守備差 不算他的錯吧..他游擊守的好
01/03 12:14
推
01/03 12:16,
他不是因為游擊手不太行 就轉了嗎?
01/03 12:16
推
01/03 12:16,
綠帽之前退出戰局了 現在就看猴子會不會突然殺出來
01/03 12:16
→
01/03 12:28,
轉3B前一年拿金手套,轉是因為安豬斯守備範圍超大～
01/03 12:28
推
01/03 12:30,
難道要改練1B@@
01/03 12:30
→
01/03 12:31,
猴子今年不會只簽個RP就收工了吧@@
01/03 12:31
→
01/03 12:35,
記得簽1年可以達到最大效益
01/03 12:35
推
01/03 12:38,
他游擊守得並不好...
01/03 12:38
→
01/03 12:38,
油及守的好是？？？
01/03 12:38
→
01/03 12:41,
樓上...
01/03 12:41
推
01/03 12:41,
他守ss守的好不好之前有討論過了吧
01/03 12:41
推
01/03 12:41,
AROD= =
01/03 12:41
→
01/03 12:41,
當初的AROD
01/03 12:41
推
01/03 12:47,
6y/96m
01/03 12:47
推
01/03 12:58,
條子的臉!!
01/03 12:58
推
01/03 12:59,
mike young?
01/03 12:59
→
01/03 13:05,
拿AR比太奇怪了吧 守備都小輸 打擊輸慘了...
01/03 13:05
推
01/03 13:13,
條子老闆要清醒 別被波拉斯洗腦
01/03 13:13
推
01/03 13:15,
川哥:準備休息囉
01/03 13:15
推
01/03 14:02,
18M/1y接受嗎 XD
01/03 14:02
推
01/03 14:23,
川哥吹哥傻傻分不清
01/03 14:23
推
01/03 14:24,
Beltran:我這幾年已經休息夠久了啦
01/03 14:24
推
01/03 15:31,
不太懂遊騎兵為什麼一直要把Young的位置奪走
01/03 15:31
推
01/03 16:01,
吹哥準備一票撈到了 真好 可以養老了 那痛痛呢?
01/03 16:01
→
01/03 16:23,
吹哥撈一票就準備養老 水手不就燒一堆錢
01/03 16:23
→
01/03 16:24,
真的懷疑他接下來會不帶棒子上場幾年
01/03 16:24
推
01/03 16:45,
Young的守備濫到傷害球隊了..
01/03 16:45
推
01/03 17:32,
借轉條子版
01/03 17:32
-- ◢█ a █◣ ╮ ╭═◢◆══╮ ╭ ◢█ ◣ ◢█ ◣ ════╮ █▌ █ ╰theanswer3╯☆ █ ◣╰══════╯ █▋ █ █▌ █ ╴◤ ◣ █▌th█e◢█◣ ◣ █◣ ◣ █ ◥█◣ ◢█◣ ◢█◣ ◢ ◤ █ ╴─◥▄ ████ █◢█a█n██s█w█er3█ █▌█ ███ ◥ ◣ ◢ ◤˙／＼3 ║ █▌ █ ◥◤◥ ◥ ▌◤ ◥ █ ◥◆ ◥█◤ ◥▌◤ █▌ █ ◢◤ ▄ ╱〈 ║ ◥██ █◤ ════════◆◤══════════ ◥█ ◤ ██ █ ════╯ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.118.41.191
推
01/03 17:37, , 1F
這樣還有可能簽Guerrero嗎?
01/03 17:37, 1F
推
01/03 17:53, , 2F
MY-1B VG-DH??
01/03 17:53, 2F
推
01/03 19:07, , 3F
新消息好像又說只是互相有興趣而已~不知是不是放消息來
01/03 19:07, 3F
→
01/03 19:07, , 4F
讓別人抬高價碼= =
01/03 19:07, 4F
推
01/03 21:31, , 5F
說真的 雖然Beltre守備很好 可是如果在無法處理掉MY
01/03 21:31, 5F
→
01/03 21:32, , 6F
的情況下 就不應該簽這個約...除非JD很有把握
01/03 21:32, 6F
推
01/04 02:05, , 7F
MY可以移防LF或者DH.一壘 並不是啥大問題吧
01/04 02:05, 7F
推
01/04 08:37, , 8F
我們沒有挖到石油或金礦 哪來的那麼多16M/yr可以花?
01/04 08:37, 8F
→
01/04 08:39, , 9F
再來的 CJ Hami Cruz等都有薪資仲裁和是否綁長約問題
01/04 08:39, 9F
→
01/04 08:40, , 10F
Young的打擊對3B來說很不錯 但是如果16M拿去簽1B/DH
01/04 08:40, 10F
→
01/04 08:40, , 11F
簽到的會是什麼打擊成績的呢???
01/04 08:40, 11F
→
01/04 08:42, , 12F
MY換位置當然沒什麼問題 問題是我們沒有那麼空間揮霍
01/04 08:42, 12F
→
07/02 20:17, 4年前 , 13F
讓別人抬高價碼= = http://yofuk.com
07/02 20:17, 13F
‣ 更多 robert6615 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1D8PUxgI (Rangers)
‣ 更多 robert6615 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1D8PUxgI (Rangers)