Re: [討論] 關於編輯的「權力」
※ 引述《TonyDog (vivre simplement)》之銘言：
: 標題: [討論] 關於編輯的「權力」
: 時間: Mon Aug 14 21:18:32 2006
:
According to your posts, there are academic journals.
In my fields(economics), there are two kinds of "editors".
One is the people whose names listed on the "editor board".
And they have "ABSOLUTE" power--they can want whatever they like,
including the veto right. The refree only can "suggest" the editors
to accept your paper, editors are the KING/QUEEN of the journal.
The other is the one who do all the format work, usually
we call them editorial assistant. From the title you can see
they have "NO" power.
In many cases(jpe, aer...many many good journals), they are
secetaries. The editorial assistant sometimes is a part-time job.
So, may I ask, which one were you arguing about?
: 在另一個版上，跟一位版友對於編輯的「權力」看法不同，
:
: 在徵得他的同意後，將文章轉貼過來。
:
: 有意思的是：「編輯」的「權力」可以到哪裡？
:
: 大家各自的出版社裡有怎樣的狀況呢？
:
: 不知道大家對於這樣的個案有怎樣的看法？
:
:
: 底下是文章內容：
:
:
:
: --
: ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
: ◆ From: 82.234.73.133
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 70.80.45.76
→
08/15 01:36, , 1F
08/15 01:36, 1F
推
08/16 20:24, , 2F
08/16 20:24, 2F
討論串 (同標題文章)