[PMGO] 快龍的集氣招式
看了巴哈兩個不同的最佳招式搭配版本
一個主張龍息+龍爪
因為龍爪有屬性加成跟爆擊率25%
另一個主張龍息+破壞死光
說是因為集氣招有0.5秒的施放時間
龍爪施放多次會耗掉好幾秒降低DPS
但是這些都是數據上的說法
想請問有沒有兩種技能搭配都試過的板友
覺得哪一種比較優勢?
--
推
05/04 02:12,
05/04 02:12
推
05/04 02:13,
05/04 02:13
推
05/04 02:14,
05/04 02:14
推
05/04 02:21,
05/04 02:21
推
05/04 02:23,
05/04 02:23
推
05/04 02:23,
05/04 02:23
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.164.76.161
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PokeMon/M.1471181058.A.436.html
推
08/14 21:25, , 1F
08/14 21:25, 1F
推
08/14 21:26, , 2F
08/14 21:26, 2F
噓
08/14 21:28, , 3F
08/14 21:28, 3F
推
08/14 21:28, , 4F
08/14 21:28, 4F
→
08/14 21:28, , 5F
08/14 21:28, 5F
推
08/14 21:29, , 6F
08/14 21:29, 6F
推
08/14 21:29, , 7F
08/14 21:29, 7F
推
08/14 21:29, , 8F
08/14 21:29, 8F
推
08/14 21:29, , 9F
08/14 21:29, 9F
推
08/14 21:31, , 10F
08/14 21:31, 10F
推
08/14 21:31, , 11F
08/14 21:31, 11F
推
08/14 21:36, , 12F
08/14 21:36, 12F
→
08/14 21:36, , 13F
08/14 21:36, 13F
→
08/14 21:36, , 14F
08/14 21:36, 14F
確實如此 他們考量的因素不同才會算出不同的結果
主張破壞死光的計算者有說過他沒把龍爪25%爆擊的期望值算進去
但我還是想知道非數據計算 玩家"用起來"的說法
噓
08/14 21:39, , 15F
08/14 21:39, 15F
→
08/14 21:42, , 16F
08/14 21:42, 16F
→
08/14 21:42, , 17F
08/14 21:42, 17F
推
08/14 21:44, , 18F
08/14 21:44, 18F
我也是好不容易拿到第一隻快龍是龍息+破壞死光
拿去炫耀卻被朋友說這隻廢 龍息+龍爪才是主流= =
可是用起來就真的很爽啊 集滿施放直接打掉一大格血量
※ 編輯: jho52106 (1.164.76.161), 08/14/2016 21:48:51
推
08/14 21:49, , 19F
08/14 21:49, 19F
推
08/14 21:49, , 20F
08/14 21:49, 20F
→
08/14 21:49, , 21F
08/14 21:49, 21F
→
08/14 21:49, , 22F
08/14 21:49, 22F
→
08/14 21:49, , 23F
08/14 21:49, 23F
推
08/14 21:51, , 24F
08/14 21:51, 24F
推
08/14 21:52, , 25F
08/14 21:52, 25F
推
08/14 21:52, , 26F
08/14 21:52, 26F
→
08/14 21:54, , 27F
08/14 21:54, 27F
推
08/14 21:55, , 28F
08/14 21:55, 28F
→
08/14 21:55, , 29F
08/14 21:55, 29F
推
08/14 21:56, , 30F
08/14 21:56, 30F
→
08/14 21:58, , 31F
08/14 21:58, 31F
推
08/14 21:58, , 32F
08/14 21:58, 32F
推
08/14 21:59, , 33F
08/14 21:59, 33F
推
08/14 21:59, , 34F
08/14 21:59, 34F
→
08/14 22:00, , 35F
08/14 22:00, 35F
→
08/14 22:00, , 36F
08/14 22:00, 36F
→
08/14 22:01, , 37F
08/14 22:01, 37F
→
08/14 22:10, , 38F
08/14 22:10, 38F
推
08/14 22:15, , 39F
08/14 22:15, 39F
→
08/14 22:16, , 40F
08/14 22:16, 40F
推
08/14 22:22, , 41F
08/14 22:22, 41F
推
08/14 22:22, , 42F
08/14 22:22, 42F
→
08/14 22:31, , 43F
08/14 22:31, 43F
推
08/14 22:33, , 44F
08/14 22:33, 44F
推
08/14 22:37, , 45F
08/14 22:37, 45F
噓
08/14 22:38, , 46F
08/14 22:38, 46F
推
08/14 22:54, , 47F
08/14 22:54, 47F
→
08/14 23:23, , 48F
08/14 23:23, 48F
推
08/15 00:07, , 49F
08/15 00:07, 49F
→
08/15 00:07, , 50F
08/15 00:07, 50F
推
08/15 07:21, , 51F
08/15 07:21, 51F
推
08/21 18:06, , 52F
08/21 18:06, 52F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):