Re: [轉錄]嬉皮衝浪手 破解愛因斯坦難題

看板Physics作者 (為所應為)時間14年前 (2011/07/20 23:21), 編輯推噓9(9推 0噓 23→)
留言32則, 13人參與, 最新討論串9/10 (看更多)
Hi, A. Garrett Lisi is a remarkable physicist. I wrote two short articles on him and posted them on the PTT Physics Board about three years ago. His 2007 ArXiv preprint (arXiv:0711.0770) has been cited 6 times since then (based on Web of Science) by others, including Lee Smolin's 2009 Physical Review D Paper. Interestingly enough, his easy version of his famous E8 story was published in Scientific American in Dec of 2010 (Source: Science American (2010), Dec: 30-37; Author: A. Garrett Lisi & James Owen Weatherall; Title: A geometric theory of everything). Hopefully, this article is accessible to current undergrad physics majors. In addition, the more-to-explore section at the end of this article allows curious readers to devle deeply into the subject matter. Finally, an experiment to prove or disprove his theory will be highly desirable in the near future. -- " The known is finite, the unknown infinite; intellectually we stand on an islet in the midst of an illimitable ocean of inexplicability. Our business in every generation is to reclaim a little more land." --- Thosmas H. Huxley -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 111.252.81.73
→
07/20 23:28, , 1F
他前年不是發表過一個統一場理論
07/20 23:28, 1F
→
07/20 23:28, , 2F
論文標題還叫theory of evrything
07/20 23:28, 2F
→
07/20 23:29, , 3F
結果德州奧斯汀一個教授馬上發了一篇
07/20 23:29, 3F
→
07/20 23:30, , 4F
there is theory of everything inside E8
07/20 23:30, 4F
→
07/20 23:32, , 5F
我雖然不懂他的E8 可是聽說他夸克模型有問題
07/20 23:32, 5F
推
07/20 23:59, , 6F
關鍵之一是E8的最低維表現空間是248
07/20 23:59, 6F
→
07/21 00:00, , 7F
這麼大的維度能包含everything 也就不會太奇怪
07/21 00:00, 7F
→
07/21 00:02, , 8F
但是他的理論中的subtlety為何?還是請行家解釋
07/21 00:02, 8F
推
07/21 02:04, , 9F
我見過他本人~~~他在我們系上演講的時被台下物理學家轟
07/21 02:04, 9F
推
07/21 02:14, , 10F
多講一點
07/21 02:14, 10F
→
07/21 02:18, , 11F
為啥被轟？
07/21 02:18, 11F
推
07/21 02:36, , 12F
我要聽八卦～
07/21 02:36, 12F
推
07/21 02:39, , 13F
伸八卦～
07/21 02:39, 13F
推
07/21 03:27, , 14F
跟單對論作者一樣嗎?
07/21 03:27, 14F
推
07/21 03:51, , 15F
被轟正常吧 要被轟而不倒才是經得起考驗的理論
07/21 03:51, 15F
→
07/21 03:52, , 16F
何況他想搞的是這麼大的一個題目
07/21 03:52, 16F
推
07/21 08:11, , 17F
有人有金彥成單對論上、下跟宇宙的機制的書評嗎？
07/21 08:11, 17F
→
07/21 08:12, , 18F
都看不懂在寫什麼 宇宙的機制背面封面的氫原子正確模型
07/21 08:12, 18F
→
07/21 08:14, , 19F
在負X軸上是質子、正X軸上是中子，然後電子繞行此雙心
07/21 08:14, 19F
→
07/21 08:15, , 20F
但這根本就不是一般的氫原子，而是氘原子
07/21 08:15, 20F
→
07/21 08:18, , 21F
m/m0=√(1+v^2)也沒公式推導 也沒說黃金角是那個角 囧
07/21 08:18, 21F
→
07/22 00:31, , 22F
科學人算是公信力高且是老牌子的通俗科學的好magazine
07/22 00:31, 22F
→
07/22 00:39, , 23F
以Lisi能被科學人邀請寫文章的角度來說，Lisi的科學貢
07/22 00:39, 23F
→
07/22 00:48, , 24F
獻是受到editor(s)的肯定。A web site conains a list
07/22 00:48, 24F
→
07/22 00:50, , 25F
of his responses to the criticisms of others with
07/22 00:50, 25F
→
07/22 00:51, , 26F
respect to his E8 story. The URL of the link is
07/22 00:51, 26F
→
07/22 00:53, , 28F
id=garrett-lisi-responds-to-criticisms-2011-05-04
07/22 00:53, 28F
推
07/22 01:34, , 29F
07/22 01:34, 29F
→
07/22 08:04, , 30F
Sci.Amer.那篇不是被Motl砲轟另一位作者上他的弦論交的報告
07/22 08:04, 30F
→
08/13 16:23, , 31F
//tinyurl.c https://noxiv.com
08/13 16:23, 31F
→
09/17 14:21, , 32F
我雖然不懂他的E8 https://daxiv.com
09/17 14:21, 32F
‣ 更多 graddivcurl 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1E9l9brY (Physics)
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文：
完整討論串 (本文為第 9 之 10 篇)：
排序： 最新先 | 最舊先 | 留言數
在新視窗開啟完整討論串 (共10篇)
‣ 更多 graddivcurl 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1E9l9brY (Physics)