[問題] 關於投稿accept後又reject

看板PhD作者 (小雨)時間8年前 (2016/07/04 20:06), 8年前編輯推噓6(608)
留言14則, 8人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
各位先進想請問一下 在前幾個禮拜所投稿的paper被通知說accept了, 不過就在今天卻又寄了一封信, Our referees are asked to make a judgement based on whether rapid publication of the paper would benefit the profession. Consequently this is not a value judgement on your work, but an expression of suitability for this journal. Also, since we regard speed as being of paramount importance, referees are permitted to make binary decisions without providing comments for authors. We are therefore unable to advise authors on the reason for a rejection. 上面的敘述實在不是很懂問題出在哪,感覺就是臨時又反悔所以reject 不知道是否有板友可以提供問題點出在哪邊? 接受信的內容 Thank you for revising your paper for IET Power Electronics. I am pleased to accept the paper for publication since the criticisms of the reviewers have now been answered. The IET now offers authors an Open Access publication option alongside our standard Subscription Access. The standard Subscription Access option involves you assigning copyright to the publisher. If you choose the Open Access option you will retain the copyright for your work by selecting one of four Creative Commons Licences. Please be aware that if you choose an Open Access licence there is an Article Processing Charge (APC) of $1,450. The APC may be covered by the same funding that you would receive for your research, and some institutions have funding set aside to fund open access publishing. Please see our Author Guide for more information: http://digital-library.theiet.org/journals/author-guide You will be contacted shortly asking you to take a decision and sign either a copyright or licence form. Your paper is ready to be typeset. Once the proofs are ready, you will be sent a notification asking you to view them and make any corrections needed. Thank you for your interest in the journal. Yours sincerely -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.227.101.116 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PhD/M.1467633994.A.1C1.html

07/04 20:22, , 1F
他好像在說suitability,但我以為這個問題第一時間就會
07/04 20:22, 1F

07/04 20:23, , 2F
被解決。不太懂為什麼都審完了才用suitability拒絕。
07/04 20:23, 2F

07/04 20:24, , 3F
是這個期刊的審稿流程不太一樣嗎?
07/04 20:24, 3F

07/04 20:56, , 4F
前面接受信可以看看嗎?
07/04 20:56, 4F
※ 編輯: smallrainy (61.227.101.116), 07/04/2016 21:28:35

07/04 21:43, , 5F
寫信去確認一下吧 感覺很怪
07/04 21:43, 5F

07/04 21:57, , 6F
這樣有點誇張了...這已經是在玩弄作者了
07/04 21:57, 6F

07/04 21:58, , 7F
假如他們沒有搞錯的話 建議寫封信確認一下
07/04 21:58, 7F

07/04 22:45, , 8F
可以寫信去問,我遇過誤發的狀況
07/04 22:45, 8F

07/05 00:00, , 9F
第一段就是信的全部了嗎?感覺好像只是在說明作業程序
07/05 00:00, 9F

07/07 21:40, , 10F
反正這期刊被SCI踢掉了,沒上可能還是好事一件,如果畢業需
07/07 21:40, 10F

07/07 21:40, , 11F
要點數。
07/07 21:40, 11F

07/08 00:20, , 12F
怎麼看一個期刊要被踢掉了呢?
07/08 00:20, 12F

07/09 23:41, , 13F
http://goo.gl/xGtxJh Title suppression
07/09 23:41, 13F

07/11 00:48, , 14F
抱歉我看錯了,我以為他是說"要"被踢掉了
07/11 00:48, 14F
文章代碼(AID): #1NUb5A71 (PhD)
文章代碼(AID): #1NUb5A71 (PhD)