[問題] Editor 建議 EDL轉投J-EDS???消失

看板PhD作者時間8年前 (2016/04/06 20:14), 編輯推噓2(208)
留言10則, 6人參與, 最新討論串1/1
小弟今天不慎 EDL 落馬 但comments很有趣 一個很正面是minor小改 另一個很壞 講了很多他的想法,但我認真認為, 他沒看懂我的文章,還拿了一篇不知道在幹嘛的古文說有人做了 然後Editor就建議我轉J-EDS 如下 (a) Your EDL review reports will be used in the evaluation by J-EDS. In most cases, no new reviews are needed, thus save time to publication. A decision should be made within 2 weeks after your paper is transferred from EDL to J-EDS. (b) J-EDS can accommodate your expanded content beyond the 3-page EDL limit if certain modifications are required by the J-EDS editors. (c) Should you choose to submit your manuscript to J-EDS, the original submission date of your manuscript to EDL will also be retained in our ScholarOne Manuscripts system. 不知道有沒有神人有試過這個 感覺雷雷der...... 謝謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.113.136.218 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PhD/M.1459944867.A.461.html

04/06 22:38, , 1F
這個期刊大概還要過一段時間才會有IF而且是Open access
04/06 22:38, 1F

04/06 22:42, , 2F
性質類似T-ED 只是比較貴 趕今年畢業就別投這個
04/06 22:42, 2F

04/07 00:51, , 3F
所以還不算在SCI裡面嘍?
04/07 00:51, 3F

04/07 02:50, , 4F
找別的投 別理他
04/07 02:50, 4F

04/16 14:22, , 5F
我也有一樣經驗,一樣被editor建議轉投新出的open access
04/16 14:22, 5F

04/18 09:07, , 6F
要付錢喔@@ 而且很貴
04/18 09:07, 6F

04/18 09:13, , 7F
付得起就投阿 113規定裡IEEE底下的都算A類期刊吧?
04/18 09:13, 7F

04/18 13:46, , 8F
我到現在還是不了解open access對作者的好處是什麼
04/18 13:46, 8F

04/18 22:18, , 9F
文章容易被看見(因為免費),所以引用率可能較高
04/18 22:18, 9F

04/19 09:51, , 10F
通常研究做得好的學校都會買期刊吧
04/19 09:51, 10F
文章代碼(AID): #1N1FsZHX (PhD)