[問題] reviewer的問題
各位大大
我知道上來問實在不太好
但我怕我英文誤解
以下是reviewer的回應
The authors have answered most of the requests.
I would like however to see more details about how the hazardous materials
(that by law must extracted, independently of its economic cost or value)
are incorporated in the model,
some comments about the potential application in a real setting,
and perhaps more details in the example of the computer.
我主要想問的是這一句
I would like however to see more details about how the hazardous materials
(that by law must extracted,independently of its economic cost or value)
are incorporated in the model
他是指,他想要看更多關於,有害物質如何整合在我的模型中嗎,
而且是針對解釋是引用什麼法規來說明嗎,並不是要探討經濟成本或價值部份
也就是extracted,這個字,各位大大認為reviewer是在指什麼呢
而後,他也希望,我多探討現實環境中的潛在應用與詳細舉更多有關電腦的例子嗎
感謝各位大大了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.255.96.164
推
10/21 03:53, , 1F
10/21 03:53, 1F
討論串 (同標題文章)