Re: 全國研究生助學金 陳情書 (一封公開信)

看板PhD作者 (l'Erudit)時間18年前 (2005/12/30 16:11), 編輯推噓3(300)
留言3則, 2人參與, 最新討論串51/79 (看更多)
※ 引述《perceval (終於考完了)》之銘言: : : 推 fhpe:那為什麼首篇說國外明牌大學發助學金是台灣的好幾倍阿? 12/30 02:52 : : 推 fhpe:連在物價較低的中國 北京大學竟然是台大的13倍 12/30 03:00 : 我第一篇就在質疑這個資料來源 : 如果是用助學金三千來和美國比 : 美國絕大部份的碩士班學生沒有領錢 : 能夠領到"政府"提供的獎助學金也是少數 Agree. We have seen this for many times. Is there anybody who can make a table to compare their salary and duty? In addition, just remind that China is not a democratic state, whilst Taiwan is a democratic country. In China, they can set hundreds of missiles aiming at anywhere without their people's agreement. Similarly, they can give free money to or take from anyone as the government like. Do you like that? You have to think of everything before you draw a strong conclusion from data. In Taiwan, US, EU or even India, everything got to have a good reason and convince the taxpayers. Even so, a good action might still not been approved in the poor parliament. You will only waste your time if you don't even have a good reason. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 82.22.90.37 ※ 編輯: lerudit 來自: 82.22.90.37 (12/30 16:32)

12/30 22:24, , 1F
有必要區分台灣和中國為country 和state嗎 感覺怪怪的
12/30 22:24, 1F

12/31 06:19, , 2F
state在這裡應該是"狀態"的意思
12/31 06:19, 2F

01/02 01:55, , 3F
"China is not a democratic state" 的state是狀態?
01/02 01:55, 3F
文章代碼(AID): #13jElFNa (PhD)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 51 之 79 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #13jElFNa (PhD)