Re: 全國研究生助學金陳情書 (一封公開信)

看板PhD作者chingi (Are you brainwashed?)時間18年前 (2005/12/24 21:08)推噓10(10推 0噓 0→)

留言10則, 7人參與討論串4/79 (看更多)

As a taxpayer, I don't know see any reason to subsidize graduate students. The government does not force them to enter a graduate school. They do not provice any serive to taxpayers, either. Why do taxpayer need to pay for their living? Furthermore, these people are likely to earn more in the future. It is unfair for poeple with less education to subsidize people with more education. If these graduate students can contribute to the research of their professors, the professors should pay for the assistance. If they can contribute to the teaching in their department, the department should pay. If students only study or research for their own future life, why do taxpayers need to give them stipend? If taxpayer really want to improve the quality of research in universities, they shuold give more money to researchers. (How to allocate money to researchers is another issue.) Students should receive money only if they contribute to the researchers. (Or they can apply for research grants by themselves.) Of course, if I am a 既得利益者, I don't want my benefits to be taken away. So, in my view, the GSA is simply an interest group to lobby for its members. -- PTT 有個討論芝加哥的版 --- 生活娛樂館生活, 娛樂, 心情 GlobalView 國際 Σ世界地球村 → 美國/異國旅遊 Chicago 都市 ●芝加哥 Chicagoland -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 199.74.99.98

推

losfer

12/24 23:40, , 1^F

12/24 23:40, 1^F

推

devilstick

12/25 00:55, , 2^F

12/25 00:55, 2^F

推

devilstick

12/25 01:08, , 3^F

12/25 01:08, 3^F