[測試] GP104效能大爆炸 屌打泰坦X與R9 295X2
這次各家的測試都出爐了,我們帳面上就挑幾個出名的大站就好,友站小惡魔那邊也有不
錯的測試,不懂英文或是電腦新手都可以參考參考。我們首先看到的是anandtech,最主
要因為還是速發Review,就大致上看一下GTX1080的效能,對上泰坦都有20~30%以上的提
升。
相信之後anandtech會給上更完整而不是這麼陽春的測試。
http://imgur.com/ePK0kDd
http://goo.gl/ST3EAV
緊接著是Techspot,特地找他的評測當然有用意阿,他另外測試了超頻OC的性能,我們可
以看到2.0Ghz效能比起公版又將近20%左右的提升,之後各家廠商都會挑出特挑版晶片,頻率上看
2.4Ghz,可以參考對照之後,自行計算性能提升的幅度,相信會讓大家滿意。
http://imgur.com/gMMf6fN
http://goo.gl/m1Z8MX
最後最後,是我個人最喜歡的評測網站,既完整又相當專業,測試項目多卻不馬虎,性能
方面大致上已經很清楚了,特別的是,這次連泰坦X都打不過的R9 295X2,1080卻輕鬆超
越約15%(4k下真實性能超越上代旗艦泰坦24%左右),不過令人為之驚豔的不是這裡,而是誇張的每瓦效能,比起上一代每瓦效能的
王者GTX980
,GTX1080強將近一倍左右,讓我們看到了16nm的潛力,別忘了這只是公版,後續的
1080OC版會給我們更多爆炸性的性能。
http://imgur.com/NoPFJRb
http://goo.gl/9Lefjv
隨後而來的Vega10/11還有GP100都將讓我們更加期待,除了這些旗艦級的顯示卡,並不是
所有人都有這麼高的預算與需求,我們沒多久也會迎接主流親民的北極星10/11 與
GP106/107,相信大家都迫不及待,接下來會有一波換卡潮了。看官們,講那麼多 摳摳先
準備好吧!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.174.182.16
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PC_Shopping/M.1463580048.A.CB7.html
※ 編輯: qaz13579 (1.174.178.177), 05/18/2016 22:03:50
推
05/18 22:07, , 1F
05/18 22:07, 1F
推
05/18 22:08, , 2F
05/18 22:08, 2F
推
05/18 22:09, , 3F
05/18 22:09, 3F
→
05/18 22:11, , 4F
05/18 22:11, 4F
→
05/18 22:12, , 5F
05/18 22:12, 5F
→
05/18 22:13, , 6F
05/18 22:13, 6F
→
05/18 22:13, , 7F
05/18 22:13, 7F
推
05/18 22:13, , 8F
05/18 22:13, 8F
推
05/18 22:14, , 9F
05/18 22:14, 9F
推
05/18 22:15, , 10F
05/18 22:15, 10F
推
05/18 22:17, , 11F
05/18 22:17, 11F
→
05/18 22:17, , 12F
05/18 22:17, 12F
→
05/18 22:18, , 13F
05/18 22:18, 13F
→
05/18 22:19, , 14F
05/18 22:19, 14F
→
05/18 22:20, , 15F
05/18 22:20, 15F
→
05/18 22:21, , 16F
05/18 22:21, 16F
→
05/18 22:21, , 17F
05/18 22:21, 17F
→
05/18 22:22, , 18F
05/18 22:22, 18F
推
05/18 22:25, , 19F
05/18 22:25, 19F
推
05/18 22:30, , 20F
05/18 22:30, 20F
推
05/18 22:31, , 21F
05/18 22:31, 21F
推
05/18 22:34, , 22F
05/18 22:34, 22F
→
05/18 22:34, , 23F
05/18 22:34, 23F
推
05/18 22:35, , 24F
05/18 22:35, 24F
推
05/18 22:35, , 25F
05/18 22:35, 25F
推
05/18 22:47, , 26F
05/18 22:47, 26F
推
05/18 22:54, , 27F
05/18 22:54, 27F
→
05/18 22:54, , 28F
05/18 22:54, 28F
推
05/18 23:01, , 29F
05/18 23:01, 29F
推
05/18 23:02, , 30F
05/18 23:02, 30F
→
05/18 23:02, , 31F
05/18 23:02, 31F
→
05/18 23:02, , 32F
05/18 23:02, 32F
→
05/18 23:03, , 33F
05/18 23:03, 33F
→
05/18 23:03, , 34F
05/18 23:03, 34F
→
05/18 23:12, , 35F
05/18 23:12, 35F
→
05/18 23:12, , 36F
05/18 23:12, 36F
推
05/18 23:14, , 37F
05/18 23:14, 37F
→
05/18 23:16, , 38F
05/18 23:16, 38F
→
05/18 23:17, , 39F
05/18 23:17, 39F
還有 52 則推文
→
05/20 01:27, , 92F
05/20 01:27, 92F
→
05/20 01:28, , 93F
05/20 01:28, 93F
→
05/20 01:38, , 94F
05/20 01:38, 94F
→
05/20 01:38, , 95F
05/20 01:38, 95F
→
05/20 01:39, , 96F
05/20 01:39, 96F
→
05/20 02:21, , 97F
05/20 02:21, 97F
→
05/20 02:21, , 98F
05/20 02:21, 98F
→
05/20 02:24, , 99F
05/20 02:24, 99F
→
05/20 02:25, , 100F
05/20 02:25, 100F
→
05/20 02:26, , 101F
05/20 02:26, 101F
→
05/20 02:27, , 102F
05/20 02:27, 102F
→
05/20 02:27, , 103F
05/20 02:27, 103F
→
05/20 02:28, , 104F
05/20 02:28, 104F
那就還好 R9 290X峰值耗電很恐怖 PSU不能省
※ 編輯: qaz13579 (1.174.178.177), 05/20/2016 02:30:09
推
05/20 02:36, , 105F
05/20 02:36, 105F
→
05/20 04:12, , 106F
05/20 04:12, 106F
→
05/20 04:12, , 107F
05/20 04:12, 107F
→
05/20 04:14, , 108F
05/20 04:14, 108F
→
05/20 04:14, , 109F
05/20 04:14, 109F
→
05/20 04:14, , 110F
05/20 04:14, 110F
→
05/20 04:15, , 111F
05/20 04:15, 111F
→
05/20 09:25, , 112F
05/20 09:25, 112F
→
05/20 09:35, , 113F
05/20 09:35, 113F
→
05/20 09:52, , 114F
05/20 09:52, 114F
→
05/20 09:53, , 115F
05/20 09:53, 115F
→
05/20 09:53, , 116F
05/20 09:53, 116F
→
05/20 10:16, , 117F
05/20 10:16, 117F
→
05/20 10:16, , 118F
05/20 10:16, 118F
→
05/20 10:16, , 119F
05/20 10:16, 119F
→
05/20 10:17, , 120F
05/20 10:17, 120F
→
05/20 10:17, , 121F
05/20 10:17, 121F
→
05/20 10:20, , 122F
05/20 10:20, 122F
說實在的我沒必要在短短的推文詳述他R9 290x的規格吧,是說你超級A粉口氣很差我才特地
另外回的,我說過就算公版峰值耗電也到300W左右 那篇只是特地回應大濕兩每張顯卡都會有超抽的問題,你超級A粉你爽就好,我拿你沒輒好嗎。
※ 編輯: qaz13579 (192.83.195.197), 05/20/2016 10:29:43
→
05/20 10:45, , 123F
05/20 10:45, 123F
→
05/20 10:45, , 124F
05/20 10:45, 124F
→
05/20 10:46, , 125F
05/20 10:46, 125F
→
05/20 10:57, , 126F
05/20 10:57, 126F
→
05/20 11:53, , 127F
05/20 11:53, 127F
→
05/20 11:53, , 128F
05/20 11:53, 128F
→
05/20 11:53, , 129F
05/20 11:53, 129F