[閒聊] OCZ TR150耐久度測試-破2000倍容量啦!!
http://bbs.pceva.com.cn/thread-131075-1-1.html
已達到2000倍全碟容量(~230TBW)
應該跌破不少人對TLC顆粒耐久度的看法
(Ex:500~1000 P/E或拿不出數據就亂扯的1/10)
算上寫入放大接近1的話相當於破2000 P/E了
85度C烘烤24小時對TLC SSD來說真的是折磨,相當不簡單
而目前發現已經有五個檔案掉速無法恢復(ECC能力和Smart Refresh還是有其極限呀)
不過數據完整性的校驗尚未出錯
題外話,之前倒是有陰謀論說這顆送測品是原廠特挑出來的(反正我是不信)
延伸閱讀:
閃存耐久並非抽紙巾那麼簡單
http://bbs.pceva.com.cn/thread-130744-1-2.html
-
期待ang728大那邊的結果~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.127.175.203
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PC_Shopping/M.1463225306.A.9A3.html
→
05/14 19:29, , 1F
05/14 19:29, 1F
→
05/14 19:30, , 2F
05/14 19:30, 2F
推推!!
→
05/14 19:40, , 3F
05/14 19:40, 3F
推
05/14 19:41, , 4F
05/14 19:41, 4F
推
05/14 19:46, , 5F
05/14 19:46, 5F
推
05/14 19:47, , 6F
05/14 19:47, 6F
→
05/14 19:48, , 7F
05/14 19:48, 7F
推
05/14 19:51, , 8F
05/14 19:51, 8F
(攤手)
→
05/14 19:54, , 9F
05/14 19:54, 9F
推
05/14 19:58, , 10F
05/14 19:58, 10F
→
05/14 19:58, , 11F
05/14 19:58, 11F
→
05/14 20:00, , 12F
05/14 20:00, 12F
多少能讓用戶放心一點就是惹
推
05/14 20:05, , 13F
05/14 20:05, 13F
推
05/14 20:06, , 14F
05/14 20:06, 14F
又清又香,但寫入就略慢
TLC搭上SLC Cache加韌體調校下去做
這兩個配起來是主流 最好是加點強大的保固...扯遠惹XD
推
05/14 20:12, , 15F
05/14 20:12, 15F
不算檔案壞掉,可能是顆粒磨損太高造成電位無法保持(簡單的來說就是快接近終點惹)
數據糾錯不出來就得調整電壓再讀取一次,這時就會有read retry(就多了一次tRead)
多幾次tRead的話加上來回糾錯自然就會提升延遲和造成掉速
不知道Secure Erase後能不能改善
推
05/14 20:20, , 16F
05/14 20:20, 16F
推
05/14 20:26, , 17F
05/14 20:26, 17F
推
05/14 20:27, , 18F
05/14 20:27, 18F
→
05/14 20:29, , 19F
05/14 20:29, 19F
推
05/14 20:31, , 20F
05/14 20:31, 20F
推
05/14 20:34, , 21F
05/14 20:34, 21F
推
05/14 20:37, , 22F
05/14 20:37, 22F
1/10太yee,現在的話大容量(400GB up)產品約2/3吧
推
05/14 20:40, , 23F
05/14 20:40, 23F
推
05/14 20:50, , 24F
05/14 20:50, 24F
推
05/14 20:54, , 25F
05/14 20:54, 25F
QQ 神比喻XD
推
05/14 21:36, , 26F
05/14 21:36, 26F
推
05/14 22:10, , 27F
05/14 22:10, 27F
推
05/14 22:30, , 28F
05/14 22:30, 28F
推
05/14 22:33, , 29F
05/14 22:33, 29F
推
05/14 23:07, , 30F
05/14 23:07, 30F
→
05/14 23:08, , 31F
05/14 23:08, 31F
算還比較牢靠的選擇
推
05/15 00:39, , 32F
05/15 00:39, 32F
這就真的沒辦法了,TLC先天的弱勢
除非買大容量產品(代表Cache也會更大)
推
05/15 01:12, , 33F
05/15 01:12, 33F
→
05/15 01:12, , 34F
05/15 01:12, 34F
推
05/15 01:34, , 35F
05/15 01:34, 35F
我只有回"推"而已,JPTT有誤判為推文
推
05/15 06:49, , 36F
05/15 06:49, 36F
大容量還是有顯著價格優勢
→
05/15 08:43, , 37F
05/15 08:43, 37F
only time will tell
推
05/15 09:21, , 38F
05/15 09:21, 38F
→
05/15 09:21, , 39F
05/15 09:21, 39F
→
05/15 09:21, , 40F
05/15 09:21, 40F
可惜大師替大眾受苦而用了美光M4,笑談Intel和三爽超級穩 善哉善哉
→
05/15 09:22, , 41F
05/15 09:22, 41F
→
05/15 09:22, , 42F
05/15 09:22, 42F
→
05/15 09:22, , 43F
05/15 09:22, 43F
320的BA0主控表示:我會8M我超穩,8M DNA還延燒到G1和G2,G4
https://communities.intel.com/thread/78618?start=0&tstart=0
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2265027
https://communities.intel.com/thread/42922?start=0&tstart=0
https://communities.intel.com/thread/55940?start=0&tstart=0
http://dracocephalum.blogspot.tw/2012/01/intel-x25-e-8mb.html
https://communities.intel.com/thread/52216
https://communities.intel.com/thread/51311?tstart=0
→
05/15 09:32, , 44F
05/15 09:32, 44F
乾wwwww
→
05/15 09:32, , 45F
05/15 09:32, 45F
→
05/15 09:34, , 46F
05/15 09:34, 46F
→
05/15 09:39, , 47F
05/15 09:39, 47F
→
05/15 09:39, , 48F
05/15 09:39, 48F
^^^^this
推
05/15 09:56, , 49F
05/15 09:56, 49F
推
05/15 11:01, , 50F
05/15 11:01, 50F
推
05/15 11:21, , 51F
05/15 11:21, 51F
→
05/15 11:21, , 52F
05/15 11:21, 52F
我的看法啦
以現在的2D NAND來說,TLC會無限接近0.67 (or 2/3)倍MLC的價位(白片或黑片除外)
一半? 真der不用想惹
(3D NAND在未來會不會打破這個情況就不知道了,但850 EVO vs 850 PRO已經非常接近2/3)
考量到能拿來做"SSD"的TLC比較少,得挑過(所以四月才會有TLC漲價的新聞)
而且還有韌體開發+驗證 這些都會加在成本上(看看那精美的540S)
等小白鼠或勇者幫廠商練完功後售價就會降了(如Ultra II和三爽TLC SSD)
推
05/15 12:18, , 53F
05/15 12:18, 53F
→
05/15 19:01, , 54F
05/15 19:01, 54F
→
05/15 19:30, , 55F
05/15 19:30, 55F
※ 編輯: Cubelia (36.239.169.138), 05/15/2016 20:34:55