[討論] Here comes TROUBLES
季初強度較低(無論是對手強弱或是賽程進湊程度)打完之後,
最近 Pacers 明顯遭遇到了瓶頸, 數據上最明顯看到的就是籃板球的保護有問題.
失誤方面以西征過半後較為嚴重, 而最近兩場的投籃命中率非常低.
Last 10 games (先 2W1L, 後 2W5L)
籃板淨差
Off Def Total
L Thunders 110:106 Pacers -5 -3 -8
W Pacers 95:92 Lakers +1 +2 +3
W Pacers 107:98 Kings -8 -6 -14
L Pacers 88:110 Jazz -12 -2 -14 18 TO
L Pacers 97:105 Suns +2 +8 +10 25 TO
----------西 征 歸 來----------------------------------------------------------
W Raptors 100:124 Pacers -9 +11 +2 18 TO
L Pacers 95:97 Bucks -14 +1 -13 對 Bucks 6 連敗
(09-10 LLLL 10-11 LL)
W Bobcats 92:100 Pacers -8 -4 -12 對 Bobcats 4 連勝
(09-10 LWW 10-11 WW)
L Pacers 83:97 Hawks -4 -8 -12 FG% 37.0% 對 Hawks 8 連敗
(08-09 WLLL 09-10 LLL 10-11 LL)
L Pacers 73:92 Bulls +4 -11 -7 FG% 35.7% 對 Bulls 最近 5 戰 4 敗
(09-10 LLLW 10-11 L)
接下來聖誕節前的賽程一樣不輕鬆, Lakers, Cavs, @Boston, Hornets
雖然有三場主場, 但是以 Pacers 對主場球賽的掌握程度, 恐怕只有贏一場的機會.
而且儘管 Cavs 處在連敗的低潮(8 連敗中, next games: @Miami, @Indiana),
以 Pacers 的近況來看, 並不能掉以輕心.
好消息是--戰績緊追在後(10-13, Pacers 11-12), 似乎已經恢復上季戰力強度的 Bucks
最近的賽程也很硬, 可能不是那麼容易可以從我們面前超車.
(@San Antonio, vs. Jazz, @Portland, @Los Angeles, @Sacramento)
以下兩則新聞蠻有意思的, 分別講到 DC 和 Roy 最近的表現, 所有人都知道 DC 沒有 JOB
的愛, 而 Roy 這幾場的確是表現不如預期, 大家的感想是???
Pacers Darren Collison still confused by point guard rotation
Starter didn't play at all in 4th quarter of Saturday's loss to Hawks in Atlanta
http://goo.gl/mM6oG
(設計對白)
JOB: T.J., 你比較有經驗,你上
DC: ...(教練,我想打球)
JOB: A.J., 你會投三分又懂得分配場上的空間又需要時間磨練,追分的時候正適合你
DC: ...(教練,我想打球)
DC: ...(What should I do?)
文章論點: DC 的攻守都不符合 JOB 的要求, 所以他得不到上場時間.
Roy Hibbert MIP?
http://blogs.indystar.com/pacersinsider/2010/12/13/obrien-said-what/
JOB: Roy Hibbert 是這季的 MIP 強力候選? 差得遠呢!
“I’m playing like crap now,” Hibbert said.
“It’s been like that since we got back from out West….
I have to get my head back. Mentally I’m not there.
I’ve got to figure something out.”
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.30.98
推
12/14 15:56, , 1F
12/14 15:56, 1F
→
12/14 15:57, , 2F
12/14 15:57, 2F
→
12/14 15:59, , 3F
12/14 15:59, 3F
→
12/14 16:00, , 4F
12/14 16:00, 4F
→
12/14 16:00, , 5F
12/14 16:00, 5F
→
12/14 16:02, , 6F
12/14 16:02, 6F
→
12/14 16:03, , 7F
12/14 16:03, 7F
→
12/14 16:03, , 8F
12/14 16:03, 8F
推
12/14 16:29, , 9F
12/14 16:29, 9F
推
12/14 16:34, , 10F
12/14 16:34, 10F
→
12/14 16:35, , 11F
12/14 16:35, 11F
→
12/14 16:38, , 12F
12/14 16:38, 12F
→
12/14 16:40, , 13F
12/14 16:40, 13F
推
12/14 17:18, , 14F
12/14 17:18, 14F
→
12/14 17:18, , 15F
12/14 17:18, 15F
推
12/14 17:24, , 16F
12/14 17:24, 16F
推
12/14 20:12, , 17F
12/14 20:12, 17F
→
12/14 20:13, , 18F
12/14 20:13, 18F
→
12/14 20:13, , 19F
12/14 20:13, 19F
推
12/14 20:31, , 20F
12/14 20:31, 20F
→
12/14 20:31, , 21F
12/14 20:31, 21F
→
12/14 20:34, , 22F
12/14 20:34, 22F
→
12/14 20:36, , 23F
12/14 20:36, 23F
→
12/14 20:40, , 24F
12/14 20:40, 24F
→
12/14 20:41, , 25F
12/14 20:41, 25F
推
12/14 20:43, , 26F
12/14 20:43, 26F
→
12/14 20:45, , 27F
12/14 20:45, 27F
推
12/14 21:21, , 28F
12/14 21:21, 28F
→
12/14 21:22, , 29F
12/14 21:22, 29F
→
12/14 21:23, , 30F
12/14 21:23, 30F
→
12/14 21:24, , 31F
12/14 21:24, 31F
→
12/14 21:24, , 32F
12/14 21:24, 32F
推
12/14 23:41, , 33F
12/14 23:41, 33F
推
12/15 12:32, , 34F
12/15 12:32, 34F
→
12/15 12:33, , 35F
12/15 12:33, 35F
→
12/15 13:39, , 36F
12/15 13:39, 36F
推
12/15 13:46, , 37F
12/15 13:46, 37F
→
12/15 18:01, , 38F
12/15 18:01, 38F
→
12/15 18:02, , 39F
12/15 18:02, 39F
→
12/15 18:03, , 40F
12/15 18:03, 40F
→
12/15 18:03, , 41F
12/15 18:03, 41F
→
12/15 18:04, , 42F
12/15 18:04, 42F
→
12/15 18:05, , 43F
12/15 18:05, 43F
→
12/15 18:08, , 44F
12/15 18:08, 44F
→
12/15 18:08, , 45F
12/15 18:08, 45F
→
12/16 12:08, , 46F
12/16 12:08, 46F
→
12/16 12:10, , 47F
12/16 12:10, 47F
→
12/16 12:13, , 48F
12/16 12:13, 48F
→
12/16 12:14, , 49F
12/16 12:14, 49F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):