[討論] 赤犬為什麼能跟青雉單挑 [雷]
海軍最高長官都指名青雉是接班人了
不懂為什麼赤犬可以不服
然後靠單挑搶位置
軍人的基本不就是服從嗎
假設說
我國
國防部長指名A上校為接班人
B上校不爽,認為自己才夠格當國防部長
於是B上校找A上校單挑輸贏,搶國防部長的位置
這樣合理嗎?
而且還把同僚打到重傷、殘缺
感覺有點不合理耶
理性討論
感恩
--
→
03/02 02:41,
03/02 02:41
推
03/02 09:04,
03/02 09:04
推
03/02 02:52,
03/02 02:52
推
03/02 03:07,
03/02 03:07
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 115.43.36.76
推
04/29 17:13, , 1F
04/29 17:13, 1F
推
04/29 17:14, , 2F
04/29 17:14, 2F
→
04/29 17:14, , 3F
04/29 17:14, 3F
我知道上面還有阿 問題是空古沒有挺赤犬接班吧
原位置的戰國都指名青雉了,
※ 編輯: free27 來自: 115.43.36.76 (04/29 17:15)
推
04/29 17:15, , 4F
04/29 17:15, 4F
政府有推薦赤犬?有這段喔 請問是哪邊的劇情 那我看漏了 SORRY
※ 編輯: free27 來自: 115.43.36.76 (04/29 17:16)
推
04/29 17:16, , 5F
04/29 17:16, 5F
→
04/29 17:16, , 6F
04/29 17:16, 6F
推
04/29 17:17, , 7F
04/29 17:17, 7F
→
04/29 17:17, , 8F
04/29 17:17, 8F
→
04/29 17:19, , 9F
04/29 17:19, 9F
→
04/29 17:20, , 10F
04/29 17:20, 10F
大大這樣講 我似乎有點印象了 感恩
※ 編輯: free27 來自: 115.43.36.76 (04/29 17:21)
推
04/29 17:24, , 11F
04/29 17:24, 11F
→
04/29 17:25, , 12F
04/29 17:25, 12F
→
04/29 17:26, , 13F
04/29 17:26, 13F
推
04/29 17:27, , 14F
04/29 17:27, 14F
推
04/29 17:38, , 15F
04/29 17:38, 15F
→
04/29 18:45, , 16F
04/29 18:45, 16F
推
04/29 19:31, , 17F
04/29 19:31, 17F
→
04/29 19:31, , 18F
04/29 19:31, 18F
→
04/29 19:32, , 19F
04/29 19:32, 19F
→
04/29 19:33, , 20F
04/29 19:33, 20F
→
04/29 20:14, , 21F
04/29 20:14, 21F
→
04/29 20:14, , 22F
04/29 20:14, 22F
推
04/29 20:37, , 23F
04/29 20:37, 23F
→
04/29 20:43, , 24F
04/29 20:43, 24F
推
04/29 20:43, , 25F
04/29 20:43, 25F
推
04/29 20:43, , 26F
04/29 20:43, 26F
→
04/29 20:43, , 27F
04/29 20:43, 27F
→
04/29 20:44, , 28F
04/29 20:44, 28F
→
04/29 20:45, , 29F
04/29 20:45, 29F
噓
04/29 20:47, , 30F
04/29 20:47, 30F
推
04/29 20:51, , 31F
04/29 20:51, 31F
推
04/29 21:06, , 32F
04/29 21:06, 32F
→
04/29 21:11, , 33F
04/29 21:11, 33F
噓
04/29 21:14, , 34F
04/29 21:14, 34F
推
04/29 21:39, , 35F
04/29 21:39, 35F
噓
04/29 21:52, , 36F
04/29 21:52, 36F
→
04/29 21:52, , 37F
04/29 21:52, 37F
推
04/29 21:55, , 38F
04/29 21:55, 38F
→
04/29 21:56, , 39F
04/29 21:56, 39F
推
04/29 22:06, , 40F
04/29 22:06, 40F
推
04/29 22:39, , 41F
04/29 22:39, 41F
→
04/29 22:39, , 42F
04/29 22:39, 42F
→
04/29 22:54, , 43F
04/29 22:54, 43F
推
04/29 22:58, , 44F
04/29 22:58, 44F
→
04/29 23:08, , 45F
04/29 23:08, 45F
→
04/29 23:18, , 46F
04/29 23:18, 46F
推
04/29 23:51, , 47F
04/29 23:51, 47F
→
04/29 23:56, , 48F
04/29 23:56, 48F
推
04/30 00:01, , 49F
04/30 00:01, 49F
推
04/30 00:10, , 50F
04/30 00:10, 50F
推
04/30 00:17, , 51F
04/30 00:17, 51F
噓
04/30 02:04, , 52F
04/30 02:04, 52F
推
04/30 03:56, , 53F
04/30 03:56, 53F
→
04/30 12:16, , 54F
04/30 12:16, 54F
推
04/30 12:30, , 55F
04/30 12:30, 55F
→
04/30 13:20, , 56F
04/30 13:20, 56F
推
04/30 17:45, , 57F
04/30 17:45, 57F
→
04/30 22:18, , 58F
04/30 22:18, 58F
噓
05/01 00:42, , 59F
05/01 00:42, 59F
噓
05/01 01:31, , 60F
05/01 01:31, 60F
推
05/01 13:06, , 61F
05/01 13:06, 61F
推
05/02 12:48, , 62F
05/02 12:48, 62F
推
05/03 10:53, , 63F
05/03 10:53, 63F
推
05/03 22:19, , 64F
05/03 22:19, 64F
→
05/04 12:02, , 65F
05/04 12:02, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
討論
24
65