[問題] 為什麼一定要用大熊當和平主義範本?
看板ONE_PIECE作者keepstudying (keepstudying)時間15年前 (2010/10/23 21:11)推噓41(41推 0噓 47→)留言88則, 62人參與討論串1/7 (看更多)
還是先避雷一下~雖然我覺得似乎沒什麼雷
跟到601..開始發現一個問題
為什麼當初一定要拿大熊來當和平主義者的範本?
以目前來看 和平主義的武器就是雷射而已
(從口或從手)
以一個會判釋敵人身份及身價的電腦
和平主義並沒有大熊的肉球能力
如果要滿足可以放雷射跟有判釋電腦
似乎不需要一定要拿大熊來當範本
當然大熊本身就是機器人也許是原因
但依據過往劇情看來
要那位智商非常高、開發出和平主義這批的那位博士
去設計一個機器人 不參考大熊範本
似乎也不是難事才對
撇去大熊曾跟世界政府立下的一些私約
是否有大熊一定得當和平主義範本的充分理由?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.170.69.113
→
10/23 21:12, , 1F
10/23 21:12, 1F
推
10/23 21:15, , 2F
10/23 21:15, 2F
→
10/23 21:17, , 3F
10/23 21:17, 3F
→
10/23 21:20, , 4F
10/23 21:20, 4F
推
10/23 21:20, , 5F
10/23 21:20, 5F
推
10/23 21:21, , 6F
10/23 21:21, 6F
→
10/23 21:21, , 7F
10/23 21:21, 7F
→
10/23 21:21, , 8F
10/23 21:21, 8F
→
10/23 21:21, , 9F
10/23 21:21, 9F
→
10/23 21:22, , 10F
10/23 21:22, 10F
→
10/23 21:22, , 11F
10/23 21:22, 11F
推
10/23 21:23, , 12F
10/23 21:23, 12F
→
10/23 21:23, , 13F
10/23 21:23, 13F
推
10/23 21:24, , 14F
10/23 21:24, 14F
→
10/23 21:26, , 15F
10/23 21:26, 15F
→
10/23 21:26, , 16F
10/23 21:26, 16F
推
10/23 21:29, , 17F
10/23 21:29, 17F
→
10/23 21:30, , 18F
10/23 21:30, 18F
→
10/23 21:31, , 19F
10/23 21:31, 19F
推
10/23 21:31, , 20F
10/23 21:31, 20F
推
10/23 21:35, , 21F
10/23 21:35, 21F
→
10/23 21:35, , 22F
10/23 21:35, 22F
推
10/23 21:36, , 23F
10/23 21:36, 23F
→
10/23 21:37, , 24F
10/23 21:37, 24F
→
10/23 21:38, , 25F
10/23 21:38, 25F
推
10/23 21:39, , 26F
10/23 21:39, 26F
推
10/23 21:43, , 27F
10/23 21:43, 27F
→
10/23 21:44, , 28F
10/23 21:44, 28F
推
10/23 21:49, , 29F
10/23 21:49, 29F
推
10/23 21:51, , 30F
10/23 21:51, 30F
推
10/23 21:57, , 31F
10/23 21:57, 31F
→
10/23 21:57, , 32F
10/23 21:57, 32F
→
10/23 21:59, , 33F
10/23 21:59, 33F
→
10/23 21:59, , 34F
10/23 21:59, 34F
→
10/23 22:00, , 35F
10/23 22:00, 35F
→
10/23 22:00, , 36F
10/23 22:00, 36F
推
10/23 22:03, , 37F
10/23 22:03, 37F
→
10/23 22:04, , 38F
10/23 22:04, 38F
→
10/23 22:05, , 39F
10/23 22:05, 39F
→
10/23 22:08, , 40F
10/23 22:08, 40F
推
10/23 22:10, , 41F
10/23 22:10, 41F
→
10/23 22:10, , 42F
10/23 22:10, 42F
推
10/23 22:11, , 43F
10/23 22:11, 43F
推
10/23 22:11, , 44F
10/23 22:11, 44F
→
10/23 22:11, , 45F
10/23 22:11, 45F
推
10/23 22:19, , 46F
10/23 22:19, 46F
→
10/23 22:20, , 47F
10/23 22:20, 47F
→
10/23 22:24, , 48F
10/23 22:24, 48F
→
10/23 22:26, , 49F
10/23 22:26, 49F
→
10/23 22:41, , 50F
10/23 22:41, 50F
推
10/23 22:49, , 51F
10/23 22:49, 51F
推
10/23 22:58, , 52F
10/23 22:58, 52F
→
10/23 23:00, , 53F
10/23 23:00, 53F
→
10/23 23:01, , 54F
10/23 23:01, 54F
→
10/23 23:03, , 55F
10/23 23:03, 55F
推
10/23 23:18, , 56F
10/23 23:18, 56F
→
10/23 23:19, , 57F
10/23 23:19, 57F
→
10/23 23:30, , 58F
10/23 23:30, 58F
推
10/23 23:35, , 59F
10/23 23:35, 59F
→
10/23 23:36, , 60F
10/23 23:36, 60F
→
10/23 23:37, , 61F
10/23 23:37, 61F
推
10/23 23:40, , 62F
10/23 23:40, 62F
推
10/23 23:44, , 63F
10/23 23:44, 63F
推
10/23 23:46, , 64F
10/23 23:46, 64F
→
10/23 23:50, , 65F
10/23 23:50, 65F
推
10/24 00:02, , 66F
10/24 00:02, 66F
→
10/24 00:03, , 67F
10/24 00:03, 67F
推
10/24 00:28, , 68F
10/24 00:28, 68F
推
10/24 00:39, , 69F
10/24 00:39, 69F
推
10/24 01:05, , 70F
10/24 01:05, 70F
推
10/24 01:17, , 71F
10/24 01:17, 71F
→
10/24 01:24, , 72F
10/24 01:24, 72F
→
10/24 01:44, , 73F
10/24 01:44, 73F
→
10/24 01:46, , 74F
10/24 01:46, 74F
→
10/24 01:47, , 75F
10/24 01:47, 75F
→
10/24 01:49, , 76F
10/24 01:49, 76F
推
10/24 09:04, , 77F
10/24 09:04, 77F
推
10/24 09:17, , 78F
10/24 09:17, 78F
→
10/24 11:58, , 79F
10/24 11:58, 79F
推
10/24 13:25, , 80F
10/24 13:25, 80F
推
10/24 16:40, , 81F
10/24 16:40, 81F
→
10/24 16:41, , 82F
10/24 16:41, 82F
推
10/24 17:56, , 83F
10/24 17:56, 83F
推
10/24 18:28, , 84F
10/24 18:28, 84F
推
10/24 19:24, , 85F
10/24 19:24, 85F
推
10/24 21:13, , 86F
10/24 21:13, 86F
推
10/25 22:19, , 87F
10/25 22:19, 87F
推
10/26 23:03, , 88F
10/26 23:03, 88F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):