Fw: [新聞] 護士荒醫院評鑑是禍根
※ [本文轉錄自 Gossiping 看板 #1FaCObxm ]
作者: thenewown (LULU寶貝的媽媽) 看板: Gossiping
標題: [新聞] 護士荒醫院評鑑是禍根
時間: Fri Apr 20 10:12:50 2012
新聞內容如以下網址:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlvXZHwK3KU
(中視新聞)
PS:
個人覺得的確評鑑制度害慘了醫護人員,為了衛生署的評鑑制度,
我跟同事常要利用下班時間及私人假日來協助製作假的文件資料。
衛生署的評鑑制度可不可以取消?真的很累
另外,關於醫療人員每6年必修150學分的制度是否能下修?
規定要醫護人員進修是好意,但是每個月假已經夠少了,還要拿去上課
上課還要自費,上課認真聽的有幾個,不都在睡覺放空!
衛生署規定要上課,還要人家放假自費出錢去上課= =
衛生署是不會幫忙付這條錢?
--
品格 是人生最重要的
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.36.38.53
→
04/20 10:13, , 1F
04/20 10:13, 1F
→
04/20 10:13, , 2F
04/20 10:13, 2F
→
04/20 10:13, , 3F
04/20 10:13, 3F
→
04/20 10:13, , 4F
04/20 10:13, 4F
→
04/20 10:14, , 5F
04/20 10:14, 5F
推
04/20 10:14, , 6F
04/20 10:14, 6F
噓
04/20 10:14, , 7F
04/20 10:14, 7F
→
04/20 10:14, , 8F
04/20 10:14, 8F
→
04/20 10:14, , 9F
04/20 10:14, 9F
推
04/20 10:15, , 10F
04/20 10:15, 10F
→
04/20 10:15, , 11F
04/20 10:15, 11F
推
04/20 10:15, , 12F
04/20 10:15, 12F
→
04/20 10:15, , 13F
04/20 10:15, 13F
→
04/20 10:16, , 14F
04/20 10:16, 14F
推
04/20 10:16, , 15F
04/20 10:16, 15F
→
04/20 10:16, , 16F
04/20 10:16, 16F
→
04/20 10:16, , 17F
04/20 10:16, 17F
→
04/20 10:17, , 18F
04/20 10:17, 18F
→
04/20 10:17, , 19F
04/20 10:17, 19F
→
04/20 10:18, , 20F
04/20 10:18, 20F
→
04/20 10:19, , 21F
04/20 10:19, 21F
→
04/20 10:19, , 22F
04/20 10:19, 22F
→
04/20 10:19, , 23F
04/20 10:19, 23F
→
04/20 10:19, , 24F
04/20 10:19, 24F
→
04/20 10:20, , 25F
04/20 10:20, 25F
→
04/20 10:20, , 26F
04/20 10:20, 26F
※ 編輯: thenewown 來自: 114.36.38.53 (04/20 10:31)
推
04/20 10:43, , 27F
04/20 10:43, 27F
※ 編輯: thenewown 來自: 114.36.38.53 (04/20 10:44)
→
04/20 10:43, , 28F
04/20 10:43, 28F
推
04/20 10:46, , 29F
04/20 10:46, 29F
推
04/20 10:49, , 30F
04/20 10:49, 30F
推
04/20 10:51, , 31F
04/20 10:51, 31F
推
04/20 10:54, , 32F
04/20 10:54, 32F
推
04/20 10:59, , 33F
04/20 10:59, 33F
推
04/20 11:27, , 34F
04/20 11:27, 34F
推
04/20 11:47, , 35F
04/20 11:47, 35F
推
04/20 11:53, , 36F
04/20 11:53, 36F
→
04/20 11:55, , 37F
04/20 11:55, 37F
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: akaume (163.21.136.202), 時間: 04/20/2012 13:44:43
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):