[外電] 聯盟副總裁:會想出新政策去限制籃網

看板Nets作者 (永遠向前看)時間10年前 (2013/08/09 10:02), 編輯推噓19(1906)
留言25則, 21人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
Slip through the ‘Nets’: Payroll legal, but NBA wanted harder cap During negotiations to create its current collective bargaining agreement, the NBA did its best to limit the amount of money its teams would be able and willing to spend on their rosters by implementing a much more punitive luxury tax system, one that officially goes into effect this season. But that more punitive system wasn’t enough to prevent the Nets from shelling out millions of billionaire owner Mikhail Prokhorov’s personal fortune this offseason. Between completing their blockbuster draft night trade with the Celtics, re-signing Andray Blatche and signing Andrei Kirilenko, Shaun Livingston and Alan Anderson, the Nets sent their payroll soaring to more than $100 million for the coming season, which means they’ve also committed to paying a massive luxury tax bill of roughly $87 million next year. “I would say it’s no secret that we went into collective bargaining seeking a hard cap,” NBA deputy commissioner Adam Silver — one of the main architects of the current CBA and who will replace David Stern as commissioner when Stern steps down Feb. 1 — told The Post Wednesday after speaking at the league’s Rookie Transition Program in Florham Park. “So, for the long-term health of the league, we would rather do more to level the playing field among our teams, so the teams that have disparate resources are all competing with roughly the same number of chips so to speak.” “What I’ll add is that what we’ve seen with the Nets, ultimately there’s no prohibition if you’re willing to pay a very substantial tax — there’s no prohibition on signing the players they did, but the new rules also dramatically limit those players that are available to sign, especially once you move into the tax. So we’ll see [what happens].” The transition from the previous luxury tax system, which penalized teams one dollar for every dollar they went over the tax threshold, to the new one that includes an escalating pay scale for every $5 million teams go over the threshold, was supposed to reign in spending and help level the playing field. Nevertheless, it didn’t prevent teams from being able to load up on high-salaried players as the Nets did — as long as they were willing to pay a substantial tax bill after doing so. The Nets certainly will fall into that category. They are set to pay out more in luxury taxes alone this season than any team in the NBA is currently set to pay in salaries. The Knicks have the second-highest committed salaries for next season, at a little less than $86 million, according to shamsports.com. While half of the tax will be distributed to all non-tax paying teams — while the other half is used as a source of funding for the league’s revenue-sharing program — there have been plenty of examples of championship contenders having to give up key pieces of their teams to help ease the burden of the new tax system. There is no better example than the Thunder, after reaching the Finals, trading James Harden to Houston before last season to avoid going beyond the tax threshold. Even the two-time defending champion Heat opted to use the amnesty clause on Mike Miller, who started the last four Finals games during their run to the title last season, in order to ease their tax burden. Still, Silver isn’t ready to say the system isn’t working because the Nets are willing to go to places where, apparently, few other team are in terms of their payroll. I think before, even as someone who was and is a proponent of a harder tax, I don’t want to declare the sky is falling yet because they are doing what is permissible under the rules,” Silver said. “There were only certain players they were able to spend that money on. “Does it give a team a competitive advantage when they have the ability to spend far more than other teams?” Silver said. “Absolutely.” ... And it’s something we pointed out to the union in bargaining, “There’s a correlation between the ability to spend and success on the court,” he continued. “It’s far from a perfect correlation, however, so we ’ll see how it plays out. “But, so far, they are playing by the rules, and we’ll see whether that brings them the success they are hoping for.” 其他29隊:保安 保安~可以讓人一直簽球星 簽了又簽 簽了又簽嗎? Mikhail Prokhorov表示:有錢臭了嗎? ╭ ╮(╯▽╰)╭ ╮ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.228.151.2

08/09 10:03, , 1F
照規矩走,豪華稅也沒少繳zzzzz
08/09 10:03, 1F

08/09 10:09, , 2F
怎不限制熱火= =
08/09 10:09, 2F

08/09 10:40, , 3F
你們不是熱火! 你們不准這樣搞!
08/09 10:40, 3F

08/09 11:00, , 4F
這樣有話題性可以製造票房有什麼不好= =
08/09 11:00, 4F

08/09 11:44, , 5F
要擋就乾脆立規則 禁止嘛 豪華稅擺在那邊又不是說不能打破
08/09 11:44, 5F

08/09 11:44, , 6F
08/09 11:44, 6F

08/09 12:37, , 7F
熱火才該被檢討吧!!
08/09 12:37, 7F

08/09 13:29, , 8F
兒子們: 乾爹!! 他們作弊~!!!
08/09 13:29, 8F

08/09 13:37, , 9F
白癡的聯盟副總 照規矩走錯了嗎 該繳的也欠嗎 蝦
08/09 13:37, 9F

08/09 14:17, , 10F
看來他們覺得乾兒子隊有危險
08/09 14:17, 10F

08/09 15:07, , 11F
副總我們這樣子錯了嗎??
08/09 15:07, 11F

08/09 22:03, , 12F
nwo大恐怕正解
08/09 22:03, 12F

08/10 01:13, , 13F
俄國佬:我來告訴你們職業籃球該怎麼玩
08/10 01:13, 13F

08/10 19:30, , 14F
我覺得抱大腿降薪的更應該被處理耶,乖乖繳稅也要被搞
08/10 19:30, 14F

08/11 20:24, , 15F
降薪報團都不管…
08/11 20:24, 15F

08/11 23:33, , 16F
這篇有點標題殺人,不覺得副總裁的發言有針對性
08/11 23:33, 16F

08/12 11:37, , 17F
反正很多人是不看內文就先開罵了XD
08/12 11:37, 17F

08/12 15:47, , 18F
強制解散籃網!
08/12 15:47, 18F

08/12 19:11, , 19F
全部標題:去限制加往後有球隊做出類似籃網今年的作為!
08/12 19:11, 19F

08/12 19:42, , 20F
聽說有可能的方式是設定Hard Cap
08/12 19:42, 20F

08/13 07:26, , 21F
而且都在怪熱火
08/13 07:26, 21F

08/13 10:23, , 22F
要設Hard Cap 乾脆取消豪華稅 反正薪資都不准超過門檻XD
08/13 10:23, 22F

08/14 12:38, , 23F
聯盟有大筆豪華稅可收,又要話題可炒,有啥不好
08/14 12:38, 23F

08/20 09:23, , 24F
豪華稅是超過薪資上限太多才會抽的稅 既然未來可能沒辦法
08/20 09:23, 24F

08/20 09:24, , 25F
超過薪資上限 那怎會有豪華稅存在?XDD
08/20 09:24, 25F
文章代碼(AID): #1I14szP1 (Nets)
文章代碼(AID): #1I14szP1 (Nets)