Re: [閒聊] 田中投球Romine和Sanchez蹲捕的差別
※ 引述《madaux (形影不離)》之銘言:
: 但一場球要投100球,怎麼可能不失神一下
: 所以田中需要被激發出他的氣勢
: 其實看Romine在捕田中的球
: 很明顯地,可以讓田中一直保持非常好的專注度
: 愈投愈有信心,有些小動作不時給田中打氣,似乎叫他「再注意再小心」
: 反觀374在捕時,明明田中的狀況也不差
: 但田中似乎無法非常集中注意力,氣勢上不來
: 374在受傷期間,Romine蹲捕讓洋基爬到東區龍頭絕對是有功勞
: 我相信這個是374未來要成為一個好捕手所需要學的
: 374有很好的天賦,超強臂力和打擊能力
: 但看得出來,這個小子還是有點神經大條
: 對於田中而言,似乎心思細密的捕手來配會更好些
: 如果看看Yadier Molina, Buster Posey,Salvador Perez等捕手
: 不僅有砲管,在帶領投手投球時也讓投手十分安心
: 當然374還算菜鳥,期待將來這部份能做得更好
想不到這話題可以燒這麼久 其實只要搜尋"Tanaka"+"Romine"
就可以找到美國多個網路媒體在對綠帽戰後的報導及訪問Girardi的看法
在此就隨選幾篇 簡單說一下大意
https://goo.gl/KsQ9HR
https://goo.gl/NXZ4DN
--Girardi said he did it because he didn’t want to
start Sanchez on Friday night and Saturday afternoon.
But Tanaka had been much more effective this season
with Romine behind the plate and Girardi wanted to
give the struggling righthander every chance to succeed against the A’s.
吉總說他原先是不想讓Sanchez蹲完週五夜場又緊接著週六午場的比賽。
而田中在本季到目前看來跟Romine搭配投球內容較好,
就盡可能不錯過任何的機會,給最近投得掙扎的田中試試看。
--Backup catcher Austin Romine was behind the plate for
Masahiro Tanaka’s start on Friday night, and manager Joe Girardi
just might continue the pairing.
在週五(對綠帽之戰)是由Romine先發搭配田中,吉總也可能考慮繼續這樣的搭配。
Entering Friday’s start, Tanaka had a 2.45 ERA with Romine catching
and opponents were slashing just .206/.254/.355 against him in five
starts. And in five starts with Sanchez catching him this year,
Tanaka had a 12.27 ERA and opponents were
slashing .422/.480/.822 against him.
Last season, both catchers enjoyed similar success
with Tanaka; Romine’s catcher’s ERA was 2.16 and
Sanchez’s was 1.94.
(這邊是比較統計數據 包括去年和今年兩個捕手的差異)
--“I’m not saying (Romine) won’t catch him next time,
but I’m not saying Gary Sanchez doesn’t know how to catch him,’’
Girardi said after Tanaka established a new career
MLB high of 13 strikeouts, yielding one run over 7.1 innings
in Friday’s 4-1 loss to Oakland.
在田中對綠帽7.1局拿到生涯新高13K的賽後,
吉總表示不排除下次繼續由Romine搭配田中,
但他也不覺得Sanchez是無法跟田中做好投補搭檔的。
------
個人想法:
其實關於要不要把Romine當作田中的「專屬捕手」,我倒是持中性的看法,
不覺得一定要用兩極化去看待這個議題。
只看今年的5個先發小小樣本裡,CC跟Sanchez是優於Romine許多。
Severino看不出有太大的差異,
田中,小P跟Montgomery是Romine較優,
所以把Romine配球說的出神入化,而看輕Sanchez的配球功力
而且只靠靈活配球就可以調低「所有投手」ERA場場致勝,是太過誇張。
如果真有這樣的捕手,那就算是自殺棒也務必找來天天蹲捕啊!
就如今年上面的例子來說,Romine搭配CC似乎就無法發揮此等功力?
不過另一方面,我倒也不覺得試著讓Romine搭配田中是很荒謬不可行的辦法。
原因之一是,就算再怎麼"everday"的捕手,近年來也不會真的叫他
天天蹲,一定還是會有輪休的,只是把輪休這天改排在田中先發日而已。
當然這意味著田中上場時會失去Sanchez的攻擊火力,不過現階段是以找回
投球狀態為主,如果有效,這一點犧牲還可以忍痛接受。
田中在我們仍是指標性Ace
(當然還有每年22M的支出,其他先發應該不需大費周章的找專屬捕手),
連續被炸兩場後,在非受傷的狀態下
亟需要一場好投來擺脫低潮,其實連在投手板的站位都想到從靠一壘側
改變為靠三壘側這種方法了,
既然蹲捕數據有這樣極端呈現,不如就讓Romine試試,換個手氣應該無妨。
現階段由於才5、6月,時間上也還允許做這樣的嘗試。
總之,上一場的結果是往好的方向發展,緊接著就要真正進入美東高強度
密集內戰了。當然不敢保證用Romine蹲捕就可場場發揮7局13K,
或者不會再有狀況,就慢慢看下去狀況如何,這樣也是個選項,
希望能朝好的方向發展
如果這樣也沒什麼用,再想其他可能的調整吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.121.202.233
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NY-Yankees/M.1496135912.A.D97.html
推
05/30 17:51, , 1F
05/30 17:51, 1F
→
05/30 17:51, , 2F
05/30 17:51, 2F
→
05/30 17:51, , 3F
05/30 17:51, 3F
推
05/30 17:53, , 4F
05/30 17:53, 4F
推
05/30 17:58, , 5F
05/30 17:58, 5F
推
05/30 20:00, , 6F
05/30 20:00, 6F
→
05/30 20:00, , 7F
05/30 20:00, 7F
推
05/30 20:49, , 8F
05/30 20:49, 8F
推
05/30 23:17, , 9F
05/30 23:17, 9F
→
05/30 23:18, , 10F
05/30 23:18, 10F
→
05/30 23:25, , 11F
05/30 23:25, 11F
推
05/30 23:25, , 12F
05/30 23:25, 12F
→
05/30 23:25, , 13F
05/30 23:25, 13F
→
05/30 23:27, , 14F
05/30 23:27, 14F
→
05/30 23:29, , 15F
05/30 23:29, 15F
推
05/30 23:47, , 16F
05/30 23:47, 16F
→
05/31 00:02, , 17F
05/31 00:02, 17F
推
05/31 01:19, , 18F
05/31 01:19, 18F
→
05/31 01:20, , 19F
05/31 01:20, 19F
→
05/31 01:21, , 20F
05/31 01:21, 20F
推
05/31 01:23, , 21F
05/31 01:23, 21F
→
05/31 01:24, , 22F
05/31 01:24, 22F
推
05/31 01:25, , 23F
05/31 01:25, 23F
→
05/31 01:26, , 24F
05/31 01:26, 24F
→
05/31 01:26, , 25F
05/31 01:26, 25F
推
05/31 01:27, , 26F
05/31 01:27, 26F
推
05/31 01:28, , 27F
05/31 01:28, 27F
推
05/31 01:30, , 28F
05/31 01:30, 28F
→
05/31 01:30, , 29F
05/31 01:30, 29F
→
05/31 01:31, , 30F
05/31 01:31, 30F
推
05/31 01:33, , 31F
05/31 01:33, 31F
→
05/31 01:35, , 32F
05/31 01:35, 32F
推
05/31 01:36, , 33F
05/31 01:36, 33F
→
05/31 01:37, , 34F
05/31 01:37, 34F
→
05/31 01:37, , 35F
05/31 01:37, 35F
→
05/31 01:39, , 36F
05/31 01:39, 36F
→
05/31 01:40, , 37F
05/31 01:40, 37F
推
05/31 01:40, , 38F
05/31 01:40, 38F
推
05/31 01:42, , 39F
05/31 01:42, 39F
還有 160 則推文
→
05/31 20:01, , 200F
05/31 20:01, 200F
→
05/31 20:01, , 201F
05/31 20:01, 201F
→
05/31 20:01, , 202F
05/31 20:01, 202F
→
05/31 20:01, , 203F
05/31 20:01, 203F
→
05/31 20:01, , 204F
05/31 20:01, 204F
→
05/31 20:01, , 205F
05/31 20:01, 205F
→
05/31 20:01, , 206F
05/31 20:01, 206F
→
05/31 20:06, , 207F
05/31 20:06, 207F
→
05/31 20:06, , 208F
05/31 20:06, 208F
→
05/31 20:07, , 209F
05/31 20:07, 209F
→
05/31 20:08, , 210F
05/31 20:08, 210F
→
05/31 20:08, , 211F
05/31 20:08, 211F
推
05/31 20:08, , 212F
05/31 20:08, 212F
→
05/31 20:09, , 213F
05/31 20:09, 213F
→
05/31 20:10, , 214F
05/31 20:10, 214F
→
05/31 20:11, , 215F
05/31 20:11, 215F
推
05/31 21:26, , 216F
05/31 21:26, 216F
→
05/31 21:26, , 217F
05/31 21:26, 217F
→
05/31 21:27, , 218F
05/31 21:27, 218F
→
05/31 21:29, , 219F
05/31 21:29, 219F
→
05/31 21:33, , 220F
05/31 21:33, 220F
→
06/01 08:21, , 221F
06/01 08:21, 221F
推
06/01 08:23, , 222F
06/01 08:23, 222F
→
06/01 08:46, , 223F
06/01 08:46, 223F
推
06/01 08:49, , 224F
06/01 08:49, 224F
推
06/01 09:12, , 225F
06/01 09:12, 225F
→
06/01 09:26, , 226F
06/01 09:26, 226F
→
06/01 09:32, , 227F
06/01 09:32, 227F
→
06/01 12:26, , 228F
06/01 12:26, 228F
→
06/01 12:27, , 229F
06/01 12:27, 229F
→
06/01 12:29, , 230F
06/01 12:29, 230F
→
06/01 12:31, , 231F
06/01 12:31, 231F
→
06/01 12:34, , 232F
06/01 12:34, 232F
推
06/01 13:06, , 233F
06/01 13:06, 233F
→
06/01 13:51, , 234F
06/01 13:51, 234F
→
06/01 13:52, , 235F
06/01 13:52, 235F
→
06/01 13:54, , 236F
06/01 13:54, 236F
→
06/02 12:28, , 237F
06/02 12:28, 237F
→
06/02 12:30, , 238F
06/02 12:30, 238F
推
06/03 00:19, , 239F
06/03 00:19, 239F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):