Re: [洋基] 田中將大來了!!!

看板NY-Yankees作者 (月讀)時間10年前 (2014/01/25 01:09), 編輯推噓14(1407)
留言21則, 15人參與, 最新討論串3/3 (看更多)
※ 引述《madaux (形影不離)》之銘言: : 有一個消息是郭源治指出 : 洋基之所以願意花錢追逐田中 : 除了肯定他的球技之外 : 還有私生活嚴謹 : 這點我也同意 : 這個的確是洋基不太想追達比修的一個理由 奇怪Cashman講得好像不一樣欸? 郭源治什麼時候可以代表NYY球團講話了? http://goo.gl/XzQuEl You’ve expressed reservations in the past about acquiring Japanese pitchers. What changed in this case? “I would say that we weren’t not interested in Yu Darvish. We were very much interested in Yu Darvish. But there was an opportunity to secure a player . . . the posting number that it was going to cost in Darvish’s case, which was an immediate transfer, along with the other opportunities, which we had Hiroki Kuroda, there was a financial consideration in all of that. “The scouting assessment on Darvish was not incorrect. Our scouting assessment on Darvish was correct. But there’s a lot of factors that went into our not securing Darvish. But it wasn’t the scouting report. “And, you’re right, there is risk with pitchers from Japan that I have certainly spoken to . . . The ball, historically, was different from team to team. But now it’s the same ball throughout, in Japan. But it’s still different from a major-league ball. The workload is different, because they pitch every seven days, versus five days over here. Strike zones are different. The lineups are different. “There’s a lot of risk associated with working through those variables. And that speaks to why we had a scout over there as much as we possibly could. As well as the evaluations in the WBC, with the major-league baseball, against major-league hitters. But at some point you still have to make a call, and make a judgment. We obviously believe in this player’s talent. It’s nice to see that there’s a number of teams that believe in that talent similarly.” -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.134.23.156

01/25 01:43, , 1F
老實說前一篇看到內文那個人名我就跳過了 不要認真XD
01/25 01:43, 1F

01/25 02:03, , 2F
推認真 外電一堆不看 看什麼中文新聞亂爆也發一篇文
01/25 02:03, 2F

01/25 03:53, , 3F
雖然那時有黑田不代表達比修要放掉啊QQ give me Yu!
01/25 03:53, 3F

01/25 03:54, , 4F
真希望NYY的球評沒看走眼不單純是在自慰…Tanaka>Yu
01/25 03:54, 4F

01/25 03:55, , 5F
球探,打錯
01/25 03:55, 5F

01/25 05:26, , 6F
沒什麼好不高興的,這篇內文不就說當時就是錢的問題
01/25 05:26, 6F

01/25 05:26, , 7F
了嗎
01/25 05:26, 7F

01/25 09:55, , 8F
上一篇就台媒水準阿..台媒真的也發這一篇新聞稿
01/25 09:55, 8F

01/25 10:22, , 9F
嘴砲啦
01/25 10:22, 9F

01/25 13:30, , 10F
有篇說到紐約課稅後剩6800萬是真的假的!?
01/25 13:30, 10F

01/25 17:24, , 11F
要灑錢,當時達爾就該灑了.....
01/25 17:24, 11F

01/25 18:38, , 12F
要買股票,Apple剛成立就該買了
01/25 18:38, 12F

01/25 19:41, , 13F
佛瑞斯特‧甘:投資水果事業很好
01/25 19:41, 13F

01/25 23:52, , 14F
NY州稅 8.89% 可以自己算一下~
01/25 23:52, 14F

01/26 00:18, , 15F
被井川嚇到吧 所以沒全力搶達比修
01/26 00:18, 15F

01/26 00:24, , 16F
當年標達比修的錢也真是低的嚇傻我了...
01/26 00:24, 16F

01/26 09:02, , 17F
所以當初沒搶達爾的原因不是豪華稅?
01/26 09:02, 17F

01/26 09:14, , 18F
達爾不能類比到蘋果,達爾也有NPB的實績,還比田中好
01/26 09:14, 18F

01/26 11:49, , 19F
井川: QAQ 不要再鞭我了啦
01/26 11:49, 19F

01/27 20:18, , 20F
8.89%那是吃飯的稅嗎?所得稅只有8.89那要普天同慶了
01/27 20:18, 20F

01/27 20:34, , 21F
那8.89%是補刀吧XD.上面應該還有聯邦的稅
01/27 20:34, 21F
文章代碼(AID): #1IufvHf8 (NY-Yankees)
文章代碼(AID): #1IufvHf8 (NY-Yankees)