Re: [轉錄] 2010 MLB Trade Deadline Grades
※ 引述《Yukirin (柏柚紀)》之銘言:
: http://tinyurl.com/387dqtk
洋基是四星
New York Yankees
換到了:Austin Kearns-以小聯盟球員換得
Kerry Wood -小聯盟球員跟現金
Lance Berkman-Jimmy Paredes, Mark Melancon
What do you get the man who has everything? An excellent fourth outfielder, a
volatile but talented setup man, and a declining but capable slugging 1B/DH
for the low low price of pretty much nothing. The Yankees' offensive depth
chart right now is absurd, aside from the Ramiro Pena part, since Ramiro Pena
sucks. What's funny, though, is that the one trade that really could've put
the Yankees over the top - the Cliff Lee trade - wound up happening with
Texas instead of New York as Seattle management shifted course at the last
possible moment. The Yankees were infuriated, and for good reason - they lost
out on one of few additions that could've made a big difference on their
roster. As is, they're the best team in baseball, but they're a team that
still has some questions about the pitching staff.
為什麼會有人什麼都能拿到手呢?一個很優秀的四號外野手,一個不穩定但是能力相當
好的Setup Man,一個衰退中但是相當堪用的長打者,還是以低到不行的籌碼拿到的。
洋基的打線現在已經強大得相當荒謬,除了Ramiro Pena,因為他真是爛透了。
但有趣的,是真正能把洋基再次推上頂端的,是Cliff Lee的交易案,雖然最後被條子
攔胡走,洋基一定很火大,他們失去了一個可以在沒什麼好補強的陣容裡得到大力提升
的機會。他們仍然是棒球世界的最佳隊伍,然而在投手方面也還稍有疑慮。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 58.114.192.200
推
08/04 23:36, , 1F
08/04 23:36, 1F
推
08/04 23:37, , 2F
08/04 23:37, 2F
推
08/04 23:39, , 3F
08/04 23:39, 3F
推
08/04 23:43, , 4F
08/04 23:43, 4F
推
08/04 23:47, , 5F
08/04 23:47, 5F
推
08/05 00:00, , 6F
08/05 00:00, 6F
推
08/05 00:08, , 7F
08/05 00:08, 7F
推
08/05 00:29, , 8F
08/05 00:29, 8F
→
08/05 00:29, , 9F
08/05 00:29, 9F
→
08/05 00:29, , 10F
08/05 00:29, 10F
推
08/05 01:17, , 11F
08/05 01:17, 11F
推
08/05 06:48, , 12F
08/05 06:48, 12F
推
08/05 07:40, , 13F
08/05 07:40, 13F
→
08/05 07:44, , 14F
08/05 07:44, 14F
→
08/05 08:04, , 15F
08/05 08:04, 15F
推
08/05 16:42, , 16F
08/05 16:42, 16F
→
08/06 13:19, , 17F
08/06 13:19, 17F
→
08/06 13:19, , 18F
08/06 13:19, 18F
→
08/06 13:20, , 19F
08/06 13:20, 19F
推
08/06 16:15, , 20F
08/06 16:15, 20F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):