[新聞] Yankees on brink of landing Cliff Lee
The Knicks didn’t get LeBron James, but the Yankees were on the
brink of obtaining Cliff Lee late last night for a package that
would include top prospect Jesus Montero, the Post has learned.
Yankees GM Brian Cashman and Seattle GM Jack Zduriencik have been
in constant contact over the last week, but it was only last night
that the Seattle GM told Yankee officials he wanted to move quickly,
possibly before the All-Star break.
The Yanks were not assured of obtaining Lee since other clubs such
as the Mets, Twins and Rangers were in talks. But the Yanks were
definitely making the strongest move last night, coming from seeming
disinterest into the clear front-runner and last night it seemed
they were all but certain to obtain the 31-year-old lefty.
In an odd twist, Lee is scheduled to pitch against the Yankees
tonight in Seattle. Lee is 8-3 with a 2.34 ERA and an amazing 89
strikeouts to just six walks. He beat the Yankees twice in the
World Series last year, the only two games the Yankees lost in
the Fall Classic.
In the offseason, the Yanks tried to make a deal with Philadelphia
and offered Montero as the key piece. But the Phillies decided to
take the Mariner offer instead.
However, Seattle’s contention plans fizzled and Lee was put up for
auction by the frustrated Mariners. The Mets were perceived to be
more interested in the ace than the Yankees. But the Yankees adore
Lee as a pitcher and had been planning to make a big push for him
as a free agent anyway.
So they decided to stay engage on this matter even as the perception
in the sport grew that the Twins were the frontrunners with perhaps
the Rangers close behind.
Yankee management looked at its rotation and had some pause.
CC Sabathia was again an ace and Andy Pettitte is pitching as well
now as ever. But A.J. Burnett and Javier Vazquez are not fully
trustworthy, especially for the playoffs, and Phil Hughes has an
innings limit of about 175, and might not be available to start.
Cashman might now be in position to either put Hughes in the bullpen
to bolster that shaky area or trade a starter, possibly Vazquez, for
a few prospects. It was possible that injured Double-A second baseman
David Adams also was part of the deal to Seattle since he is a player
the Mariners like a great deal.
The Yanks also were obviously worried about being in a highly competitive
division with the Red Sox and Rays, and Lee is the kind of player who
can separate them. Having Sabathia and Lee – one-time Indians teammates –
as a 1-2 punch atop the rotation turn the Yanks into even stronger favorites
to repeat as champions.
The Yanks like Montero a great deal, but they were willing to use him as
bait for both Lee and Roy Halladay in the offseason. They are deep in
catching prospects and could never be sure that Montero could actually
make it as a catcher in the majors since that is the suspect area of the game. He is considered one of the elite hitting prospects in the minors, though he was hitting just .253 with six homers and 34 RBIs this season at Triple-A.
http://tinyurl.com/22oz7ng
可能的交易:
Lee <------> Montero+ David Adams(2A)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.170.16.66
推
07/09 17:25, , 1F
07/09 17:25, 1F
※ Vitus:轉錄至看板 MLB 07/09 17:27
推
07/09 17:30, , 2F
07/09 17:30, 2F
推
07/09 17:32, , 3F
07/09 17:32, 3F
→
07/09 17:32, , 4F
07/09 17:32, 4F
→
07/09 17:33, , 5F
07/09 17:33, 5F
→
07/09 17:33, , 6F
07/09 17:33, 6F
推
07/09 17:34, , 7F
07/09 17:34, 7F
→
07/09 17:34, , 8F
07/09 17:34, 8F
推
07/09 17:35, , 9F
07/09 17:35, 9F
推
07/09 17:35, , 10F
07/09 17:35, 10F
→
07/09 17:36, , 11F
07/09 17:36, 11F
→
07/09 17:36, , 12F
07/09 17:36, 12F
推
07/09 17:37, , 13F
07/09 17:37, 13F
→
07/09 17:37, , 14F
07/09 17:37, 14F
推
07/09 17:37, , 15F
07/09 17:37, 15F
→
07/09 17:37, , 16F
07/09 17:37, 16F
→
07/09 17:38, , 17F
07/09 17:38, 17F
推
07/09 17:40, , 18F
07/09 17:40, 18F
→
07/09 17:41, , 19F
07/09 17:41, 19F
推
07/09 17:42, , 20F
07/09 17:42, 20F
→
07/09 17:42, , 21F
07/09 17:42, 21F
→
07/09 17:44, , 22F
07/09 17:44, 22F
推
07/09 17:46, , 23F
07/09 17:46, 23F
推
07/09 17:47, , 24F
07/09 17:47, 24F
推
07/09 17:48, , 25F
07/09 17:48, 25F
→
07/09 17:49, , 26F
07/09 17:49, 26F
→
07/09 17:58, , 27F
07/09 17:58, 27F
→
07/09 17:58, , 28F
07/09 17:58, 28F
推
07/09 18:01, , 29F
07/09 18:01, 29F
推
07/09 18:04, , 30F
07/09 18:04, 30F
推
07/09 18:04, , 31F
07/09 18:04, 31F
→
07/09 18:05, , 32F
07/09 18:05, 32F
→
07/09 18:05, , 33F
07/09 18:05, 33F
推
07/09 18:07, , 34F
07/09 18:07, 34F
→
07/09 18:08, , 35F
07/09 18:08, 35F
→
07/09 18:09, , 36F
07/09 18:09, 36F
推
07/09 18:09, , 37F
07/09 18:09, 37F
→
07/09 18:09, , 38F
07/09 18:09, 38F
推
07/09 18:14, , 39F
07/09 18:14, 39F
推
07/09 18:17, , 40F
07/09 18:17, 40F
推
07/09 18:23, , 41F
07/09 18:23, 41F
推
07/09 18:24, , 42F
07/09 18:24, 42F
→
07/09 18:25, , 43F
07/09 18:25, 43F
→
07/09 18:27, , 44F
07/09 18:27, 44F
推
07/09 18:27, , 45F
07/09 18:27, 45F
推
07/09 19:10, , 46F
07/09 19:10, 46F
→
07/09 19:15, , 47F
07/09 19:15, 47F
→
07/09 19:16, , 48F
07/09 19:16, 48F
推
07/09 19:31, , 49F
07/09 19:31, 49F
推
07/09 20:06, , 50F
07/09 20:06, 50F
推
07/09 21:21, , 51F
07/09 21:21, 51F
→
07/09 21:55, , 52F
07/09 21:55, 52F
→
07/09 21:55, , 53F
07/09 21:55, 53F
→
07/09 22:07, , 54F
07/09 22:07, 54F
→
07/09 22:11, , 55F
07/09 22:11, 55F
推
07/09 22:12, , 56F
07/09 22:12, 56F
推
07/09 22:13, , 57F
07/09 22:13, 57F
→
07/09 22:14, , 58F
07/09 22:14, 58F
→
07/09 22:14, , 59F
07/09 22:14, 59F
→
07/09 22:15, , 60F
07/09 22:15, 60F
→
07/09 22:15, , 61F
07/09 22:15, 61F
→
07/09 22:16, , 62F
07/09 22:16, 62F
→
07/09 22:18, , 63F
07/09 22:18, 63F
推
07/09 22:19, , 64F
07/09 22:19, 64F
推
07/09 22:20, , 65F
07/09 22:20, 65F
→
07/09 22:20, , 66F
07/09 22:20, 66F
→
07/09 22:21, , 67F
07/09 22:21, 67F
→
07/09 22:21, , 68F
07/09 22:21, 68F
→
07/09 22:21, , 69F
07/09 22:21, 69F
→
07/09 22:22, , 70F
07/09 22:22, 70F
→
07/09 22:23, , 71F
07/09 22:23, 71F
推
07/09 22:24, , 72F
07/09 22:24, 72F
→
07/09 22:24, , 73F
07/09 22:24, 73F
→
07/09 22:25, , 74F
07/09 22:25, 74F
→
07/09 22:26, , 75F
07/09 22:26, 75F
→
07/09 22:26, , 76F
07/09 22:26, 76F
→
07/09 22:26, , 77F
07/09 22:26, 77F
→
07/09 22:27, , 78F
07/09 22:27, 78F
→
07/09 22:28, , 79F
07/09 22:28, 79F
→
07/09 22:28, , 80F
07/09 22:28, 80F
→
07/09 22:29, , 81F
07/09 22:29, 81F
→
07/09 22:30, , 82F
07/09 22:30, 82F
→
07/09 22:31, , 83F
07/09 22:31, 83F
→
07/09 22:31, , 84F
07/09 22:31, 84F
→
07/09 22:32, , 85F
07/09 22:32, 85F
→
07/09 22:33, , 86F
07/09 22:33, 86F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):