Re: [新聞] Alex Rodriguez out for 10 weeks
Hip expert: A-Rod will need surgery
http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2009/03/05/hip-expert-a-rod-will-need-surgery/
所以說如果小的話,休息也許可以解決,開刀復健也不用太久
可是變大的話連跑步都有影響, 就一定要開刀,而且要休息一段時間
I just spoke to an expert, Dr. Robert Buly of the Hospital for Special
Surgery in Manhattan. He is an orthopedic surgeon who specializes in hips.
Only last week, Dr. Buly presented back-to-back papers on treating this very
injury with Dr. Marc Philippon, the surgeon treating Alex Rodriguez.
According to Dr. Buly, A-Rod likely has an impingement in his hip socket, a
common injury for athletes. It comes from the femoral bone hitting the rim of
the socket. The labrum, he said, is like a rubber gasket around the socket. A
torn labrum is a symptom of the impingement.
A cyst such as the one A-Rod is typical in these cases. “That’s an
indication something has gone bad with the hip,” Dr. Buly said.
Dr. Buly said it is “not unreasonable” to try rest and rehab. “But at some
point you have to bite the bullet and have the surgery. It’s going to get
progressively worse and for the patient, it’s pretty miserable,” he said.
A-Rod’s ability to play depends on the size of the tear and how quickly it
gets larger. At some point, surgery will be needed. If it is only soft
tissue, the recovery time is six to eight weeks. If bone must be repaired, it
would take three to four months.
Brian Cashman indicated today that surgery would knock A-Rod out for four
months, so it is likely he has some sort of bone deformity. This comes from
wear and tear or some sort of anatomical abnormality.
Dr. Buly, who is a Yankees fan, said A-Rod would soon have trouble pivoting
or flexing. Running, at least at first, will not be a problem.
Only time will tell how the Yankees handle this. But keep this in mind:
Cashman said all last season that Jorge Posada’s torn labrum could be
treated with rest and rehab. Then on July 30, as Posada underwent surgery,
they made a surprise trade for Pudge Rodriguez.
I would expect the same in this case. What is the point of babying A-Rod
through the season only to see him break down in September and October? Make
a trade now, get the surgery and perhaps he returns by the All-Star break.
Scott Rolen ($22 million over two years) and Bill Hall ($24.45 over three
years) have a lot of money left on their deals. That would be a lot to spend
on a half-season patch. But maybe there is a 3B out there to be had. Or
perhaps Milwaukee would give some money back to be free of Hall’s deal. In
this economy, trade parameters are changing.
You want some other names? Off the top of my head how about Melvin Mora,
Chone Figgins, Mark Teahen, Garrett Atkins, Chad Tracy. Maybe Hank Blalock.
Detroit could part with Brandon Inge.
Mark Grudzielanek is a free agent. That would be the cheap out.
Point is, there are a lot of options out there.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.113.252.10
→
03/06 09:53, , 1F
03/06 09:53, 1F
→
03/06 09:54, , 2F
03/06 09:54, 2F
推
03/06 09:55, , 3F
03/06 09:55, 3F
推
03/06 09:56, , 4F
03/06 09:56, 4F
推
03/06 09:56, , 5F
03/06 09:56, 5F
→
03/06 09:57, , 6F
03/06 09:57, 6F
→
03/06 09:57, , 7F
03/06 09:57, 7F
→
03/06 10:00, , 8F
03/06 10:00, 8F
推
03/06 10:01, , 9F
03/06 10:01, 9F
推
03/06 10:02, , 10F
03/06 10:02, 10F
推
03/06 10:04, , 11F
03/06 10:04, 11F
→
03/06 10:05, , 12F
03/06 10:05, 12F
推
03/06 10:06, , 13F
03/06 10:06, 13F
推
03/06 10:06, , 14F
03/06 10:06, 14F
推
03/06 10:07, , 15F
03/06 10:07, 15F
→
03/06 10:07, , 16F
03/06 10:07, 16F
推
03/06 10:08, , 17F
03/06 10:08, 17F
推
03/06 10:08, , 18F
03/06 10:08, 18F
推
03/06 10:14, , 19F
03/06 10:14, 19F
推
03/06 10:14, , 20F
03/06 10:14, 20F
→
03/06 10:14, , 21F
03/06 10:14, 21F
推
03/06 10:52, , 22F
03/06 10:52, 22F
→
03/06 10:53, , 23F
03/06 10:53, 23F
推
03/06 10:56, , 24F
03/06 10:56, 24F
→
03/06 11:01, , 25F
03/06 11:01, 25F
推
03/06 11:27, , 26F
03/06 11:27, 26F
推
03/06 11:32, , 27F
03/06 11:32, 27F
→
03/06 11:33, , 28F
03/06 11:33, 28F
推
03/06 11:34, , 29F
03/06 11:34, 29F
推
03/06 11:35, , 30F
03/06 11:35, 30F
→
03/06 12:28, , 31F
03/06 12:28, 31F
→
03/06 12:30, , 32F
03/06 12:30, 32F
推
03/06 12:30, , 33F
03/06 12:30, 33F
→
03/06 12:31, , 34F
03/06 12:31, 34F
推
03/06 12:32, , 35F
03/06 12:32, 35F
→
03/06 12:32, , 36F
03/06 12:32, 36F
→
03/06 12:33, , 37F
03/06 12:33, 37F
→
03/06 12:34, , 38F
03/06 12:34, 38F
推
03/06 12:35, , 39F
03/06 12:35, 39F
推
03/06 14:29, , 40F
03/06 14:29, 40F
→
03/06 14:48, , 41F
03/06 14:48, 41F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 10 篇):