Re: Concerning the possible curriculum change

看板NTU09DFLL作者lwsun (大叔)時間15年前 (2010/04/03 00:35)推噓6(6推 0噓 7→)

留言13則, 5人參與討論串2/4 (看更多)

※ 引述《mandy14039 (Mandy Lu)》之銘言： : ※ 引述《lwsun (大叔)》之銘言： : : There's a video clip concerned with a professor's opinion about the issue of : : removing the FE for DFLL's student next semester. If interested, you can watch : : it on my FB webpage. However, because it's just a personal opinion, plz keep it : : low-keyed, and it's available to my FB's friends only. : Thanks for 大叔's video. Ms.Chung's talk did arouse some students' attention. : Some of us discussed after Guy's class as well as in our Freshman Chinese class. : There are two separate (possible) changes about future DFLL courses. : The fisrt one is to remove the Freshman English or not. : The other one is the size of Literature courses. : I know there are many classmates who agree with Ms.Chung's opinion. : However, I also think that before we want to convey our ideas to the school : or the DFLL office, we should first hear what others think. : The problem is that we are not in the same class so there are few chances for : us to discuss, maybe more specifically, on these curriculum issues. : Let's use this place to share our opinions:) First, please forgive me for writing such poor words. I just chatted with C.J. on the MSN, and he mentioned something interesting. We talked about if the materials that Ms. Chung, Giles, and Guy taught us so far is replaceable or not, and I said maybe Guy's MLA style is the most important thing than those of Ms. Chung and Giles, because we'll learn linguistics in the future. As to the vocabularies, I'm sure we'll keep on learning them in every course. But, C.J. pointed out the truth told by a senior student. Actually, when attending the course of Junior Composition, we'll have chance to learn about the MLA style, so it turns out to be replaceable too, and Guy just taught the things that we'll learn when we're juniors. Therefore, I was confused. If we'll contact with these things again in the near future, why should we learn them in advance? I guess maybe they want us to establish the foundation of future learning. Afterall, some of us are not quite so good in the aspect of lessons. I think they want us to be fully prepared when facing the incoming challenges. So, it seems to still be a controversy worth discussing, and no wonder professors of DFLL are keeping arguing. What's other classmates' opinion? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.247.74 ※ 編輯: lwsun 來自: 140.112.247.74 (04/03 00:39)

→

Licyn

04/03 01:00, , 1^F

04/03 01:00, 1^F

→

Licyn

04/03 01:05, , 2^F

04/03 01:05, 2^F

推

brian5pig

04/03 01:35, , 3^F

04/03 01:35, 3^F