Re: [教學] 橫飛麻將-實戰牌例1
※ 引述《playerOrz (批樂兒.歐阿力)》之銘言:
: 老師回錯文了吧!?怎麼會在獨立思考這篇回了個實戰牌例的問題?
: ※ 引述《henfei (飛)》之銘言:
:
第三把牌,22m 56789p 1233466s 南南南,拆對的話應該可以拆二萬
: : ,而且如果考慮防守的狀況下, 3366s都在自己在手上,可能比較不
: : 會去拆,而且會暴露牌情。
我覺得這把打2or6在機率上都差不多
不過老師已經把打6的理由說了
但我還是覺得打3才是最高機率原則
打6是犧牲兩個碰(22.66)
打3是犧牲吃2的機會
以張數才說都缺四張
但是吃是兩個人幫你摸(你跟上家)
碰是四個人幫你打
但也或許老師是怕下家吃邊3
寧可給6不給3
只能說攻守難以兼得
我來個表格好了
攻擊% 防守%
打6 70 30
打3 75 25
打2 70 29
打牌都有牌理.打得出來講得通 都是好牌
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.168.22.161
※ 編輯: coolbetter33 來自: 118.168.22.161 (02/02 00:41)
推
02/02 00:45, , 1F
02/02 00:45, 1F
噓
02/02 00:51, , 2F
02/02 00:51, 2F
→
02/02 00:52, , 3F
02/02 00:52, 3F
→
02/02 00:59, , 4F
02/02 00:59, 4F
→
02/02 00:59, , 5F
02/02 00:59, 5F
→
02/02 01:03, , 6F
02/02 01:03, 6F
→
02/02 01:04, , 7F
02/02 01:04, 7F
→
02/02 01:05, , 8F
02/02 01:05, 8F
推
02/02 01:10, , 9F
02/02 01:10, 9F
→
02/02 01:12, , 10F
02/02 01:12, 10F
→
02/02 01:12, , 11F
02/02 01:12, 11F
→
02/02 01:12, , 12F
02/02 01:12, 12F
推
02/02 01:15, , 13F
02/02 01:15, 13F
→
02/02 01:16, , 14F
02/02 01:16, 14F
→
02/02 01:17, , 15F
02/02 01:17, 15F
→
02/02 01:17, , 16F
02/02 01:17, 16F
→
02/02 01:19, , 17F
02/02 01:19, 17F
→
02/02 01:20, , 18F
02/02 01:20, 18F
→
02/02 01:21, , 19F
02/02 01:21, 19F
→
02/02 01:26, , 20F
02/02 01:26, 20F
→
02/02 01:27, , 21F
02/02 01:27, 21F
討論串 (同標題文章)