[轉錄][情報] USPTO新法暫停實施

看板NCTU_ITL作者 (無良)時間16年前 (2007/11/02 15:44), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 Patent 看板] 作者: barley (莫忘初衷) 看板: Patent 標題: [情報] USPTO新法暫停實施 時間: Thu Nov 1 10:51:22 2007 NOTICE REGARDING CLAIMS AND CONTINUATIONS RULES The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a final rule notice in the Federal Register to revise the rules of practice in patent cases relating to continuing applications and requests for continued examination practices, and for the examination of claims in patent applications. See Changes to Practice for Continued Examination Filings, Patent Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims, and Examination of Claims in Patent Applications, 72 Fed. Reg. 46716 (Aug. 21, 2007) (Claims and Continuations Final Rule). The final rule notice published in the Federal Register indicates that the effective date for the changes to the rules of practice in the Claims and Continuations Final Rule is November 1, 2007. On October 31, 2007, the United States District Court for the Eastern District Court of Virginia, however, issued a Preliminary Injunction enjoining the USPTO from implementing the changes in the Claims and Continuations Final Rule. Therefore, the changes to the rules of practice in the Claims and Continuations Final Rule will not go into effect on November 1, 2007. USPTO employees are to continue processing and examining patent applications under the rules and procedures in effect on October 31, 2007, until further notice. This Web site will be updated and USPTO employees will be notified with further information as it becomes available. Inquiries regarding this notice should be directed to the appropriate TC representative. http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/GSK_20PI_20Order.pdf -- 恩...不太清楚發preliminary injunction的原因 不知道有沒有人可以提供一下 總而言之是個好消息... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.120.41.52

11/01 11:19,
本日最紅消息
11/01 11:19
※ 編輯: barley 來自: 59.120.41.52 (11/01 11:51)

11/01 11:57,
也很好奇為什麼州法院的的禁制令可以約束USPTO
11/01 11:57

11/01 12:07,
interesting!
11/01 12:07

11/01 12:13,
州法院..嗎 可能uspto總部或主機剛好在那州 屬地給他判?
11/01 12:13

11/01 12:16,
這間是Federal Ct.理由是PTO逾越權限(有點類似台灣行政
11/01 12:16

11/01 12:20,
法的法律保留原則) 對firm這可能是好消息 但對常被美韓
11/01 12:20

11/01 12:21,
大廠以CA等子孫案控告侵權的台灣inhouse卻可能是壞消息
11/01 12:21

11/01 15:48,
聽同事說USPTO總部也在Virginia 所以他可以發injunction
11/01 15:48

11/01 15:49,
不過如果federal court覺得不合理的話 也許還會翻案
11/01 15:49

11/01 16:22,
這間是聯邦地院,而且是有名的Rocket Docket,審一個訴訟
11/01 16:22

11/01 16:26,
比USPTO審一件申請案還快
11/01 16:26
-- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.170.30.38
文章代碼(AID): #17AjLF_Q (NCTU_ITL)