[閒聊] Twitter大混戰XD (本家&LA)
自從禮拜二Michael Weatherly開了推之後,twitter的世界又更歡樂了起來XD
然後,不知道為什麼演變到今天,變成NCIS&NCIS:LA的搶女人大作戰(誤)
首先,是MW引起的XDDD
他公然的在twitter上表達了他對Kensi的愛意
#M_Weatherly Michael Weatherly
Now following the Ncis chick @DanielaRuah...
That is one crazy Federal Agent... Love the #Esquire video....
#M_Weatherly Michael Weatherly
Preparing to defend myself from KeNozzo pairing...
喔,Tony,放開你的手,Kensi是Deeks的!
然後Kensi對於Tony赤裸裸的愛意也有了善意的回應
#DanielaRuah Daniela Ruah
@M_Weatherly Well helloooo Mr.Weatherly welcome to THIS world :))
Tony就不要臉的攀起關係來了XD
#M_Weatherly Michael Weatherly
@DanielaRuah I have noticed your initials are DR, a
nd I am married to a Dr. Coincidence? Yes. Entirely.
(註:現實生活中MW的老婆是醫生DR)
#DanielaRuah Daniela Ruah
@M_Weatherly i have noticed her & I are both European.
Tendencies? Yes. Entirely.
這時候Deeks怎麼能讓他們倆得那麼愉快咧,於是介入提出挑戰
#ericcolsen eric christian olsen
This seems like a good format to discuss our crossover @m_weatherly
Arm wrestling Stallone over-the-top style? Baby oil = glistening biceps.
然後Tony很孬地說,咱們打個商量好不XD
#M_Weatherly Michael Weatherly
@ericcolsen I trust you are aware of Kenozzo. Okay. Heres the deal.
Pistols At Dawn... or we could just have breakfast and chat. Simples.
然後怎麼會變成這樣了XD
#ericcolsen eric christian olsen
@M_Weatherly my proposal: I'll trade u one slightly damaged @danielaruah
for a @pauleyp and a ziva. No tradezies, no give backs.
結果Deeks不甘心Tony搶了Kensi,還跟粉絲討論起他跟Ziva配對要怎麼稱呼XDDD
#ericcolsen eric christian olsen
A gentlemen always lets the lady decide...
RT @HistoryDiva25: @ericcolsen Ziva and Deeks? Zeeks? Or Diva?
面對兩位男士(犬類?)的爭奪,女主角倒是呼朋引伴吃雞排搬板凳
#DanielaRuah Daniela Ruah
Option2: @PauleyP Ziva & Kensi eat popcorn & watch
@ericcolsen & @M_Weatherly wrestle in jell-O
目前就演到這裡,會不會未完待續,就請大家自己來追他們的推特了 (毆)
真的好歡樂啊!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 60.245.68.131
推
11/11 12:54, , 1F
11/11 12:54, 1F
欸...不知道為啥這推會出現在這篇XD
其實我沒有追LA阿 (掩面)
推
11/11 13:35, , 2F
11/11 13:35, 2F
→
11/11 13:36, , 3F
11/11 13:36, 3F
→
11/11 13:37, , 4F
11/11 13:37, 4F
※ 編輯: luckyc 來自: 60.245.68.131 (11/11 13:57)
→
11/11 14:37, , 5F
11/11 14:37, 5F
推
11/11 14:47, , 6F
11/11 14:47, 6F
→
11/11 15:04, , 7F
11/11 15:04, 7F
推
11/11 15:24, , 8F
11/11 15:24, 8F
→
11/11 15:25, , 9F
11/11 15:25, 9F
推
11/11 17:44, , 10F
11/11 17:44, 10F
推
11/11 18:10, , 11F
11/11 18:10, 11F
→
11/11 18:12, , 12F
11/11 18:12, 12F
推
11/11 23:17, , 13F
11/11 23:17, 13F
推
11/11 23:20, , 14F
11/11 23:20, 14F
推
11/11 23:21, , 15F
11/11 23:21, 15F
→
11/11 23:23, , 16F
11/11 23:23, 16F
→
11/11 23:23, , 17F
11/11 23:23, 17F
→
11/11 23:23, , 18F
11/11 23:23, 18F
→
11/11 23:23, , 19F
11/11 23:23, 19F
→
11/11 23:31, , 20F
11/11 23:31, 20F
→
11/12 00:10, , 21F
11/12 00:10, 21F
推
11/12 00:31, , 22F
11/12 00:31, 22F
推
11/12 11:32, , 23F
11/12 11:32, 23F
→
11/13 00:39, , 24F
11/13 00:39, 24F
推
11/14 03:29, , 25F
11/14 03:29, 25F
→
11/14 08:34, , 26F
11/14 08:34, 26F
推
11/14 09:49, , 27F
11/14 09:49, 27F
推
11/16 02:39, , 28F
11/16 02:39, 28F
推
11/18 15:46, , 29F
11/18 15:46, 29F
推
05/14 22:44, , 30F
05/14 22:44, 30F
→
05/14 22:44, , 31F
05/14 22:44, 31F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):