Re: [影片] 2K12廣告之MJ告訴你哪隊才是史上最強

看板NBA_Film作者 (protect)時間14年前 (2011/09/10 23:19), 編輯推噓10(10推 0噓 17→)
留言27則, 12人參與, 最新討論串2/3 (看更多)
※ 引述《b9010140 (NWharry)》之銘言： : http://youtu.be/g5Btwz77xHE
: 96年72勝紀錄 : 我想喬神和手上戒指的說服力很夠 XD 提供小弟聽譯如下，如有錯請指正 People always debate it. Who's the greatest player of all time? Dumb question. It should be, who's the greatest team of all time. You know, there are so many teams to choose from. The 91 Chicago Bulls? Sorry Show Time. The 92 Bulls? Back to back. 93 Bulls? First three-peat. 97 Bulls? Even with flu. 98 Bulls? No push off. And my favorite, the 96 Chicago Bulls. 72 wins, tough to beat that. What? You think there is someone else? Prove it. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.165.74.148
推
09/10 23:21, , 1F
推!
09/10 23:21, 1F
推
09/10 23:24, , 2F
"WHICH" IS THE GREATEST TEAM OF ALL TIME
09/10 23:24, 2F
→
09/10 23:26, , 3F
順便翻譯啊
09/10 23:26, 3F
推
09/10 23:27, , 4F
even with "the" flu
09/10 23:27, 4F
推
09/10 23:27, , 5F
第三句應該是dumb question,然後隊伍的關係用"whose"而不
09/10 23:27, 5F
→
09/10 23:28, , 6F
是who's
09/10 23:28, 6F
→
09/10 23:31, , 7F
b大說是對的,感謝指正
09/10 23:31, 7F
※ 編輯: otter 來自: 118.165.74.148 (09/10 23:34)
→
09/10 23:34, , 8F
whose不是指"誰的"嗎? 這樣這句就少掉be動詞了...
09/10 23:34, 8F
→
09/10 23:35, , 9F
抱歉在這裡討論起英文來了...
09/10 23:35, 9F
→
09/10 23:35, , 10F
改了dumb的部分,whose我也覺得有爭議
09/10 23:35, 10F
→
09/10 23:36, , 11F
另外the flu,MJ確實沒說the..其實有時候黑人比較不在意文法
09/10 23:36, 11F
→
09/10 23:40, , 12F
指正不敢,搞不好我是錯的XD
09/10 23:40, 12F
推
09/10 23:42, , 13F
這邊dumb question指的是蠢問題? 還是有別的說法? 感謝~
09/10 23:42, 13F
→
09/10 23:50, , 14F
蠢問題的意思沒錯~這段是說與其浪費時間爭論誰是最偉大球
09/10 23:50, 14F
→
09/10 23:51, , 15F
員.到不如討論最偉大的是哪一隊-> 2K12主題,塞爾提克,湖
09/10 23:51, 15F
→
09/10 23:51, , 16F
人,還是公牛 (MJ的的選擇當然是...)
09/10 23:51, 16F
推
09/11 00:11, , 17F
是which好嗎? 你看影片最後 就是寫which
09/11 00:11, 17F
推
09/11 00:13, , 18F
幹抱歉 是我沒仔細聽 他真的不是說which XDD
09/11 00:13, 18F
→
09/11 00:13, , 19F
SORRY
09/11 00:13, 19F
→
09/11 01:29, , 20F
感激您!
09/11 01:29, 20F
推
09/11 11:20, , 21F
09/11 11:20, 21F
→
09/12 19:52, , 22F
巔峰是peak吧 peat是泥炭
09/12 19:52, 22F
推
09/13 00:42, , 23F
樓上，three-peat不是指顛峰，是three+repeat，三連霸的意
09/13 00:42, 23F
→
09/13 00:42, , 24F
思
09/13 00:42, 24F
→
09/13 03:28, , 25F
有這種用法喔 真是受教了....stO
09/13 03:28, 25F
→
09/13 12:37, , 26F
據說是油頭發明的詞...
09/13 12:37, 26F
推
09/15 16:29, , 27F
受教了
09/15 16:29, 27F
‣ 更多 otter 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1EQu02Em (NBA_Film)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
以下文章回應了本文：
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇)：
排序： 最新先 | 最舊先 | 留言數
在新視窗開啟完整討論串 (共3篇)
‣ 更多 otter 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1EQu02Em (NBA_Film)