Re: [請益] 12*13 ROTO 傳統九項
※ 引述《wallaces (不遺憾,不後悔)》之銘言:
: 12人 ROTO
: 傳統九項 FG% FT% 3PTM PTS REB AST ST BLK TO
: 1 10 Josh Smith (Atl - SF,PF)
: 2 15 Brandon Jennings (Mil - PG)
: 3 34 Paul George (Ind - SG,SF)
: 4 39 Greg Monroe (Det - C)
: 5 58 Gerald Wallace (Bkn - SF,PF)
: 6 63 Jrue Holiday (Phi - PG)
: 7 82 Damian Lillard (Por - PG)
: 8 87 Andrew Bogut (GS - C)
: 9 106 Jared Dudley (Pho - SG,SF)
: 10 111 Jordan Crawford (Was - PG,SG)
: 11 130 Shawn Marion (Dal - SF,PF)
: 12 135 Greivis Vasquez (NO - PG,SG)
: 13 154 Jason Thompson (Sac - PF,C)
: 陣容如上,如果先不討論FA有誰,請問我選到的陣型比較適合哪幾項發展,
: 本來是想拼板/抄/鍋,不過沒選到強力中鋒,該如何補強呢?
: 或是用哪幾隻重覆性高的去交易?
後來季前前面打太爛,忍不住把Vasquez丟抓裝猛,
把Wallace拿去換Jordan,就變成下面這樣~~
PG Jrue Holiday
SG Paul George
G Brandon Jennings
SF Josh Smith
PF Andre Drummond
F Shawn Marion
C Greg Monroe
C DeAndre Jordan
Util Jared Dudley
Util Damian Lillard
BN Andrew Bogut
BN Dorell Wright
BN Mario Chalmers
看起來強的是REB和AST,現在想補強BLK,
請問我拿Lillard+後段去換Ibaka會對等嗎?
持有者的PG是A米,Lou Williams和John Wall..
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 42.72.0.66
→
11/02 10:37, , 1F
11/02 10:37, 1F
推
11/02 10:40, , 2F
11/02 10:40, 2F
→
11/02 10:42, , 3F
11/02 10:42, 3F
推
11/02 10:43, , 4F
11/02 10:43, 4F
→
11/02 10:44, , 5F
11/02 10:44, 5F
推
11/02 10:45, , 6F
11/02 10:45, 6F
→
11/02 10:48, , 7F
11/02 10:48, 7F
→
11/02 10:49, , 8F
11/02 10:49, 8F
→
11/02 10:52, , 9F
11/02 10:52, 9F
推
11/02 10:53, , 10F
11/02 10:53, 10F
→
11/02 10:54, , 11F
11/02 10:54, 11F
→
11/02 10:55, , 12F
11/02 10:55, 12F
→
11/02 10:56, , 13F
11/02 10:56, 13F
推
11/02 11:01, , 14F
11/02 11:01, 14F
→
11/02 11:01, , 15F
11/02 11:01, 15F
→
11/02 11:02, , 16F
11/02 11:02, 16F
推
11/02 11:02, , 17F
11/02 11:02, 17F
→
11/02 11:02, , 18F
11/02 11:02, 18F
→
11/02 11:03, , 19F
11/02 11:03, 19F
→
11/02 11:04, , 20F
11/02 11:04, 20F
→
11/02 11:04, , 21F
11/02 11:04, 21F
→
11/02 11:04, , 22F
11/02 11:04, 22F
→
11/02 11:04, , 23F
11/02 11:04, 23F
→
11/02 11:05, , 24F
11/02 11:05, 24F
→
11/02 11:06, , 25F
11/02 11:06, 25F
→
11/02 11:06, , 26F
11/02 11:06, 26F
推
11/02 11:07, , 27F
11/02 11:07, 27F
→
11/02 11:07, , 28F
11/02 11:07, 28F
→
11/02 11:08, , 29F
11/02 11:08, 29F
→
11/02 11:09, , 30F
11/02 11:09, 30F
→
11/02 11:09, , 31F
11/02 11:09, 31F
→
11/02 11:12, , 32F
11/02 11:12, 32F
推
11/02 11:13, , 33F
11/02 11:13, 33F
推
11/02 11:13, , 34F
11/02 11:13, 34F
→
11/02 11:14, , 35F
11/02 11:14, 35F
推
11/02 11:14, , 36F
11/02 11:14, 36F
推
11/02 11:16, , 37F
11/02 11:16, 37F
推
11/02 11:18, , 38F
11/02 11:18, 38F
→
11/02 11:19, , 39F
11/02 11:19, 39F
→
11/02 11:20, , 40F
11/02 11:20, 40F
→
11/02 11:20, , 41F
11/02 11:20, 41F
→
11/02 11:21, , 42F
11/02 11:21, 42F
→
11/02 13:25, , 43F
11/02 13:25, 43F
推
11/02 13:43, , 44F
11/02 13:43, 44F
→
11/02 13:44, , 45F
11/02 13:44, 45F
推
11/02 14:06, , 46F
11/02 14:06, 46F
推
11/02 14:10, , 47F
11/02 14:10, 47F
推
11/02 14:17, , 48F
11/02 14:17, 48F
→
11/02 14:18, , 49F
11/02 14:18, 49F
推
11/02 14:29, , 50F
11/02 14:29, 50F
→
11/02 14:44, , 51F
11/02 14:44, 51F
推
11/02 15:13, , 52F
11/02 15:13, 52F
→
11/02 15:14, , 53F
11/02 15:14, 53F
→
11/02 15:16, , 54F
11/02 15:16, 54F
→
11/02 15:18, , 55F
11/02 15:18, 55F
→
11/02 15:20, , 56F
11/02 15:20, 56F
推
11/02 15:26, , 57F
11/02 15:26, 57F
推
11/02 15:27, , 58F
11/02 15:27, 58F
→
11/02 15:27, , 59F
11/02 15:27, 59F
→
11/02 15:27, , 60F
11/02 15:27, 60F
推
11/02 15:44, , 61F
11/02 15:44, 61F
推
11/02 15:44, , 62F
11/02 15:44, 62F
→
11/02 15:44, , 63F
11/02 15:44, 63F
→
11/02 15:49, , 64F
11/02 15:49, 64F
推
11/02 16:17, , 65F
11/02 16:17, 65F
推
11/02 17:05, , 66F
11/02 17:05, 66F
→
11/02 17:15, , 67F
11/02 17:15, 67F
推
11/02 17:28, , 68F
11/02 17:28, 68F
推
11/02 19:44, , 69F
11/02 19:44, 69F
→
11/03 14:52, , 70F
11/03 14:52, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):