[板務] 請專案板主解釋TiangLei君之裁判依據
如題,請專案板主解釋TiangLei君永久水桶之判決依據,以明規則之尺度。
依#1HQEf6Sv公告文之意旨,專案板主乃之職權專為行使#1H4GZRqB之暫行版規;
然觀#1H4GZRqB,並未提及罰則。
行為人TiangLei發文行為乃於#1HQEf6Sv公告文後產生,當時並未有任何罰則可供依循。
其後,依專案版主之公告#1HQFVYWP,賦與其自身"劣退並依情節輕重處分"之權限
並宣稱乃於"本(#1HQFVYWP)篇公告後生效"
且給予緩衝時限,即"同時,該(#1H4GZRqB)公告至今所有文章、推文,
寬限一日,明起逐一劣退並依情節輕重處分。"
請問,
1.TiangLei君的文章發於緩衝時限內,符合給予緩衝時限之要件。
為何不需經過"!"之標記並給予一日之緩衝即直接給予刪文裂退水桶之裁判?
2.若TiangLei君之水桶原因並非討論它版事務(即#1H4GZRqB之暫行版規),則專案版主是否
有權限可給予裂退水桶裁判?
請專案版主提供判決依據,供版友認知及依循,感謝。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.136.198.100
推
04/13 23:49, , 1F
04/13 23:49, 1F
噓
04/13 23:49, , 2F
04/13 23:49, 2F
→
04/13 23:49, , 3F
04/13 23:49, 3F
→
04/13 23:50, , 4F
04/13 23:50, 4F
→
04/13 23:51, , 5F
04/13 23:51, 5F
→
04/13 23:52, , 6F
04/13 23:52, 6F
推
04/13 23:52, , 7F
04/13 23:52, 7F
推
04/13 23:54, , 8F
04/13 23:54, 8F
噓
04/13 23:54, , 9F
04/13 23:54, 9F
→
04/13 23:55, , 10F
04/13 23:55, 10F
→
04/13 23:55, , 11F
04/13 23:55, 11F
→
04/13 23:57, , 12F
04/13 23:57, 12F
→
04/13 23:58, , 13F
04/13 23:58, 13F
→
04/14 00:01, , 14F
04/14 00:01, 14F
推
04/14 00:02, , 15F
04/14 00:02, 15F
推
04/14 00:03, , 16F
04/14 00:03, 16F
推
04/14 00:03, , 17F
04/14 00:03, 17F
推
04/14 00:09, , 18F
04/14 00:09, 18F
→
04/14 00:12, , 19F
04/14 00:12, 19F
推
04/14 00:13, , 20F
04/14 00:13, 20F
→
04/14 00:13, , 21F
04/14 00:13, 21F
推
04/14 00:13, , 22F
04/14 00:13, 22F
→
04/14 00:14, , 23F
04/14 00:14, 23F
→
04/14 00:14, , 24F
04/14 00:14, 24F
→
04/14 00:15, , 25F
04/14 00:15, 25F
→
04/14 00:15, , 26F
04/14 00:15, 26F
→
04/14 00:15, , 27F
04/14 00:15, 27F
→
04/14 00:15, , 28F
04/14 00:15, 28F
→
04/14 00:16, , 29F
04/14 00:16, 29F
→
04/14 00:16, , 30F
04/14 00:16, 30F
→
04/14 00:16, , 31F
04/14 00:16, 31F
→
04/14 00:17, , 32F
04/14 00:17, 32F
→
04/14 00:18, , 33F
04/14 00:18, 33F
推
04/14 00:18, , 34F
04/14 00:18, 34F
→
04/14 00:19, , 35F
04/14 00:19, 35F
→
04/14 00:19, , 36F
04/14 00:19, 36F
→
04/14 00:20, , 37F
04/14 00:20, 37F
推
04/14 00:20, , 38F
04/14 00:20, 38F
→
04/14 00:21, , 39F
04/14 00:21, 39F
→
04/14 00:21, , 40F
04/14 00:21, 40F
→
04/14 00:21, , 41F
04/14 00:21, 41F
→
04/14 00:21, , 42F
04/14 00:21, 42F
→
04/14 00:22, , 43F
04/14 00:22, 43F
推
04/14 00:24, , 44F
04/14 00:24, 44F
推
04/14 00:25, , 45F
04/14 00:25, 45F
→
04/14 00:25, , 46F
04/14 00:25, 46F
推
04/14 00:25, , 47F
04/14 00:25, 47F
→
04/14 00:25, , 48F
04/14 00:25, 48F
→
04/14 00:26, , 49F
04/14 00:26, 49F
推
04/14 00:26, , 50F
04/14 00:26, 50F
推
04/14 00:28, , 51F
04/14 00:28, 51F
→
04/14 00:28, , 52F
04/14 00:28, 52F
推
04/14 00:30, , 53F
04/14 00:30, 53F
→
04/14 00:30, , 54F
04/14 00:30, 54F
推
04/14 00:34, , 55F
04/14 00:34, 55F
推
04/14 00:36, , 56F
04/14 00:36, 56F
→
04/14 00:36, , 57F
04/14 00:36, 57F
推
04/14 00:37, , 58F
04/14 00:37, 58F
推
04/14 02:04, , 59F
04/14 02:04, 59F
推
04/14 11:05, , 60F
04/14 11:05, 60F
→
04/14 11:05, , 61F
04/14 11:05, 61F
推
04/14 14:43, , 62F
04/14 14:43, 62F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):