[討論] 魔術師&大鳥+TD&Kobe的歷史排名消失
在冠軍平手之下,很多人以MVP&FMVP各多一座,把TD排在Kobe前面。
然而,事情有這麼簡單嗎?
要知道,TD一生在季賽從沒拿下任何的單項王,連籃板王和火鍋王都沒有,反觀Kobe可是
拿到
兩座得分王;其次,Kobe曾經率隊衛冕成功,TD並沒有;最後,儘管MVP多一座,但是TD
於02年獲得的那座是媒體公認的五大爭議MVP,相關連結在這。
https://goo.gl/McuZed
https://goo.gl/q4hYdX
https://goo.gl/GecsQO
https://goo.gl/b4wq4x
雖然Kobe就一座MVP而已,卻是媒體公認的無爭議。否則以上連結怎麼都沒有他的名字出
現?
就像我們不會在MVP平手之下直接認定冠軍與FMVP較多的魔術師應該勝過大鳥,因為魔術
師90年的MVP一樣被公認是五大爭議,至於大鳥的獎項則是全面壓到性獲得。何況魔術師
五冠僅有兩冠是當一哥時取得的,大鳥反倒三冠全是以一哥身份奪得。由此可見,魔術師
真的未必贏過大鳥;同理,TD也不一定成就高過Kobe。
一些不同的觀點,與諸位分享。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 202.125.194.19
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1507012476.A.B7B.html
噓
10/03 14:35, , 1F
10/03 14:35, 1F
噓
10/03 14:36, , 2F
10/03 14:36, 2F
噓
10/03 14:37, , 3F
10/03 14:37, 3F
多家媒體給的爭議名單都沒有08年,當年MVP沒有爭議是早就有共識的。
→
10/03 14:37, , 4F
10/03 14:37, 4F
推
10/03 14:37, , 5F
10/03 14:37, 5F
→
10/03 14:37, , 6F
10/03 14:37, 6F
噓
10/03 14:37, , 7F
10/03 14:37, 7F
噓
10/03 14:37, , 8F
10/03 14:37, 8F
噓
10/03 14:38, , 9F
10/03 14:38, 9F
推
10/03 14:38, , 10F
10/03 14:38, 10F
噓
10/03 14:38, , 11F
10/03 14:38, 11F
噓
10/03 14:38, , 12F
10/03 14:38, 12F
噓
10/03 14:39, , 13F
10/03 14:39, 13F
噓
10/03 14:39, , 14F
10/03 14:39, 14F
噓
10/03 14:40, , 15F
10/03 14:40, 15F
推
10/03 14:41, , 16F
10/03 14:41, 16F
噓
10/03 14:43, , 17F
10/03 14:43, 17F
1990的話給Barkley,2002的話給Kidd,媒體的觀點是這樣。
推
10/03 14:43, , 18F
10/03 14:43, 18F
噓
10/03 14:45, , 19F
10/03 14:45, 19F
※ 編輯: lwy012018 (202.125.194.19), 10/03/2017 14:46:58
噓
10/03 14:45, , 20F
10/03 14:45, 20F
噓
10/03 14:49, , 21F
10/03 14:49, 21F
噓
10/03 14:50, , 22F
10/03 14:50, 22F
噓
10/03 14:51, , 23F
10/03 14:51, 23F
噓
10/03 14:51, , 24F
10/03 14:51, 24F
推
10/03 14:51, , 25F
10/03 14:51, 25F
噓
10/03 14:54, , 26F
10/03 14:54, 26F
噓
10/03 14:54, , 27F
10/03 14:54, 27F
推
10/03 14:56, , 28F
10/03 14:56, 28F
推
10/03 15:00, , 29F
10/03 15:00, 29F
噓
10/03 15:02, , 30F
10/03 15:02, 30F
噓
10/03 15:04, , 31F
10/03 15:04, 31F
噓
10/03 15:06, , 32F
10/03 15:06, 32F
噓
10/03 15:07, , 33F
10/03 15:07, 33F
推
10/03 15:07, , 34F
10/03 15:07, 34F
推
10/03 15:12, , 35F
10/03 15:12, 35F
→
10/03 15:17, , 36F
10/03 15:17, 36F
噓
10/03 15:18, , 37F
10/03 15:18, 37F
噓
10/03 15:19, , 38F
10/03 15:19, 38F
推
10/03 15:22, , 39F
10/03 15:22, 39F
→
10/03 15:22, , 40F
10/03 15:22, 40F
噓
10/03 15:32, , 41F
10/03 15:32, 41F
→
10/03 15:34, , 42F
10/03 15:34, 42F
噓
10/03 15:36, , 43F
10/03 15:36, 43F
噓
10/03 15:49, , 44F
10/03 15:49, 44F
噓
10/03 15:57, , 45F
10/03 15:57, 45F
噓
10/03 15:57, , 46F
10/03 15:57, 46F
噓
10/03 16:07, , 47F
10/03 16:07, 47F
→
10/03 16:22, , 48F
10/03 16:22, 48F
噓
10/03 16:36, , 49F
10/03 16:36, 49F
噓
10/03 16:52, , 50F
10/03 16:52, 50F
推
10/03 16:56, , 51F
10/03 16:56, 51F
→
10/03 16:56, , 52F
10/03 16:56, 52F
噓
10/03 17:06, , 53F
10/03 17:06, 53F
噓
10/03 17:21, , 54F
10/03 17:21, 54F
噓
10/03 17:29, , 55F
10/03 17:29, 55F
噓
10/03 17:40, , 56F
10/03 17:40, 56F
噓
10/03 18:01, , 57F
10/03 18:01, 57F
噓
10/03 18:44, , 58F
10/03 18:44, 58F
推
10/03 19:04, , 59F
10/03 19:04, 59F
→
10/03 19:04, , 60F
10/03 19:04, 60F
→
10/03 19:04, , 61F
10/03 19:04, 61F
噓
10/03 19:17, , 62F
10/03 19:17, 62F
推
10/03 19:34, , 63F
10/03 19:34, 63F
推
10/03 19:53, , 64F
10/03 19:53, 64F
→
10/03 20:00, , 65F
10/03 20:00, 65F
→
10/03 20:01, , 66F
10/03 20:01, 66F
噓
10/03 20:04, , 67F
10/03 20:04, 67F
噓
10/03 20:14, , 68F
10/03 20:14, 68F
噓
10/03 20:21, , 69F
10/03 20:21, 69F
噓
10/03 20:58, , 70F
10/03 20:58, 70F
→
10/03 21:13, , 71F
10/03 21:13, 71F
→
10/03 21:15, , 72F
10/03 21:15, 72F
噓
10/03 22:16, , 73F
10/03 22:16, 73F
推
10/03 22:53, , 74F
10/03 22:53, 74F
噓
10/03 22:59, , 75F
10/03 22:59, 75F
噓
10/04 00:05, , 76F
10/04 00:05, 76F
噓
10/04 01:34, , 77F
10/04 01:34, 77F
噓
10/04 03:02, , 78F
10/04 03:02, 78F
噓
10/04 07:35, , 79F
10/04 07:35, 79F
噓
10/04 09:46, , 80F
10/04 09:46, 80F
噓
10/04 13:18, , 81F
10/04 13:18, 81F
噓
10/04 19:30, , 82F
10/04 19:30, 82F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):