[討論] 為什麼要討論球員"如果沒受傷"的表現?
每次看到有人在討論誰誰誰如果沒受傷表現就會怎樣怎樣的時候都感到很不解
今天NBA就是個高強度的比賽 除非是那種被埋地雷 惡意中傷的那種 不然我是覺得身體素
質也是能力的一環吧
其實像是討論說推特王如果沒受傷的話可以拿27分12籃板這種單純討論數據的話就還好
但如果是要討論誰誰誰如果沒受傷生涯成就早就屌打誰的這種我就不予置評了
今天事實就是被你拿出來比較的兩位一個被傷勢影響表現甚至報銷了 一個就是有本事在
這種高強度的比賽中穩定的出賽跟表現
還是大家也認為受傷與否本來就可以列入討論嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 39.9.198.87
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1505204520.A.1B3.html
推
09/12 16:22, , 1F
09/12 16:22, 1F
推
09/12 16:24, , 2F
09/12 16:24, 2F
推
09/12 16:25, , 3F
09/12 16:25, 3F
→
09/12 16:25, , 4F
09/12 16:25, 4F
你又知道我喜歡女生
※ 編輯: waiting0212 (39.9.198.87), 09/12/2017 16:25:37
推
09/12 16:25, , 5F
09/12 16:25, 5F
→
09/12 16:26, , 6F
09/12 16:26, 6F
推
09/12 16:26, , 7F
09/12 16:26, 7F
→
09/12 16:26, , 8F
09/12 16:26, 8F
→
09/12 16:27, , 9F
09/12 16:27, 9F
推
09/12 16:27, , 10F
09/12 16:27, 10F
→
09/12 16:27, , 11F
09/12 16:27, 11F
→
09/12 16:28, , 12F
09/12 16:28, 12F
→
09/12 16:28, , 13F
09/12 16:28, 13F
推
09/12 16:28, , 14F
09/12 16:28, 14F
→
09/12 16:28, , 15F
09/12 16:28, 15F
推
09/12 16:29, , 16F
09/12 16:29, 16F
→
09/12 16:29, , 17F
09/12 16:29, 17F
推
09/12 16:29, , 18F
09/12 16:29, 18F
推
09/12 16:31, , 19F
09/12 16:31, 19F
→
09/12 16:31, , 20F
09/12 16:31, 20F
推
09/12 16:32, , 21F
09/12 16:32, 21F
推
09/12 16:33, , 22F
09/12 16:33, 22F
→
09/12 16:36, , 23F
09/12 16:36, 23F
推
09/12 16:39, , 24F
09/12 16:39, 24F
→
09/12 16:42, , 25F
09/12 16:42, 25F
→
09/12 16:43, , 26F
09/12 16:43, 26F
推
09/12 16:46, , 27F
09/12 16:46, 27F
推
09/12 16:46, , 28F
09/12 16:46, 28F
→
09/12 16:54, , 29F
09/12 16:54, 29F
推
09/12 16:54, , 30F
09/12 16:54, 30F
推
09/12 16:56, , 31F
09/12 16:56, 31F
推
09/12 16:57, , 32F
09/12 16:57, 32F
推
09/12 17:07, , 33F
09/12 17:07, 33F
推
09/12 17:22, , 34F
09/12 17:22, 34F
推
09/12 17:25, , 35F
09/12 17:25, 35F
→
09/12 17:43, , 36F
09/12 17:43, 36F
推
09/12 17:45, , 37F
09/12 17:45, 37F
推
09/12 18:08, , 38F
09/12 18:08, 38F
→
09/12 18:08, , 39F
09/12 18:08, 39F
推
09/12 18:10, , 40F
09/12 18:10, 40F
推
09/12 18:15, , 41F
09/12 18:15, 41F
→
09/12 18:15, , 42F
09/12 18:15, 42F
→
09/12 18:17, , 43F
09/12 18:17, 43F
→
09/12 18:17, , 44F
09/12 18:17, 44F
→
09/12 18:44, , 45F
09/12 18:44, 45F
噓
09/12 18:46, , 46F
09/12 18:46, 46F
推
09/12 18:46, , 47F
09/12 18:46, 47F
→
09/12 18:47, , 48F
09/12 18:47, 48F
→
09/12 18:47, , 49F
09/12 18:47, 49F
推
09/12 19:52, , 50F
09/12 19:52, 50F
推
09/12 20:06, , 51F
09/12 20:06, 51F
推
09/12 20:06, , 52F
09/12 20:06, 52F
推
09/12 21:49, , 53F
09/12 21:49, 53F
→
09/12 21:49, , 54F
09/12 21:49, 54F
推
09/12 23:49, , 55F
09/12 23:49, 55F
→
09/12 23:49, , 56F
09/12 23:49, 56F
→
09/12 23:49, , 57F
09/12 23:49, 57F
→
09/12 23:50, , 58F
09/12 23:50, 58F
推
09/12 23:50, , 59F
09/12 23:50, 59F
推
09/13 01:48, , 60F
09/13 01:48, 60F
→
09/13 02:05, , 61F
09/13 02:05, 61F
→
09/13 09:49, , 62F
09/13 09:49, 62F
→
09/13 09:50, , 63F
09/13 09:50, 63F
→
09/13 09:53, , 64F
09/13 09:53, 64F
→
09/13 09:54, , 65F
09/13 09:54, 65F
→
09/13 09:54, , 66F
09/13 09:54, 66F
→
09/13 09:55, , 67F
09/13 09:55, 67F
→
09/13 09:56, , 68F
09/13 09:56, 68F
→
09/13 09:57, , 69F
09/13 09:57, 69F
推
09/13 12:57, , 70F
09/13 12:57, 70F
推
09/13 14:35, , 71F
09/13 14:35, 71F
→
09/13 14:35, , 72F
09/13 14:35, 72F
噓
09/13 18:28, , 73F
09/13 18:28, 73F
推
09/13 21:51, , 74F
09/13 21:51, 74F