Re: [花邊] SI專家:Kobe Bryant乃最被高估之一,全靠
以Michael Jordan的立場來講
他不可能去捧喇叭詹,而去打壓KOBE
因為喇叭詹是現在進行式,也真的在17年NBA Final前被認為有機會超越MJ,成為GOAT
所以他一定會去抬高KOBE的歷史定位
因為狗鼻已經退休,塵埃落定,加上狗鼻是被公認接近MJ,但無法超越MJ的人物
把LBJ打壓到狗鼻的排名之後
是MJ在換個方式跟姆獅說:「你別想超越我了,你連狗鼻都超越不了。」
再者,Jordan從以前就有透露他可能比較欣賞的是KD
他本身喜好的球員,就不是喇叭詹那種壯碩,坦克切的打法
綜上,實在很難認為MJ這次的評論是中肯客觀的。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.137.206.215
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1501823540.A.1FA.html
噓
08/04 13:13, , 1F
08/04 13:13, 1F
噓
08/04 13:14, , 2F
08/04 13:14, 2F
噓
08/04 13:14, , 3F
08/04 13:14, 3F
有些媒體認為,如果他有辦法打敗17年這隻開外掛的勇士
就能夠超越MJ成為GOAT,但後來結果是沒辦法
→
08/04 13:14, , 4F
08/04 13:14, 4F
→
08/04 13:15, , 5F
08/04 13:15, 5F
噓
08/04 13:15, , 6F
08/04 13:15, 6F
推
08/04 13:15, , 7F
08/04 13:15, 7F
→
08/04 13:15, , 8F
08/04 13:15, 8F
→
08/04 13:16, , 9F
08/04 13:16, 9F
→
08/04 13:17, , 10F
08/04 13:17, 10F
主流媒體就是把姆斯排在KOBE前面啊!而且差距還不小
我也很天真的認為豪豪比哈登強,但是那是我個人喜好,一點也不客觀啊
推
08/04 13:21, , 11F
08/04 13:21, 11F
推
08/04 13:21, , 12F
08/04 13:21, 12F
→
08/04 13:21, , 13F
08/04 13:21, 13F
→
08/04 13:21, , 14F
08/04 13:21, 14F
噓
08/04 13:21, , 15F
08/04 13:21, 15F
推
08/04 13:21, , 16F
08/04 13:21, 16F
→
08/04 13:22, , 17F
08/04 13:22, 17F
→
08/04 13:22, , 18F
08/04 13:22, 18F
噓
08/04 13:22, , 19F
08/04 13:22, 19F
→
08/04 13:22, , 20F
08/04 13:22, 20F
※ 編輯: thausand (114.137.206.215), 08/04/2017 13:25:01
噓
08/04 13:23, , 21F
08/04 13:23, 21F
推
08/04 13:23, , 22F
08/04 13:23, 22F
→
08/04 13:24, , 23F
08/04 13:24, 23F
→
08/04 13:24, , 24F
08/04 13:24, 24F
推
08/04 13:27, , 25F
08/04 13:27, 25F
→
08/04 13:28, , 26F
08/04 13:28, 26F
→
08/04 13:32, , 27F
08/04 13:32, 27F
推
08/04 13:36, , 28F
08/04 13:36, 28F
→
08/04 13:36, , 29F
08/04 13:36, 29F
推
08/04 13:42, , 30F
08/04 13:42, 30F
推
08/04 13:43, , 31F
08/04 13:43, 31F
推
08/04 13:46, , 32F
08/04 13:46, 32F
→
08/04 13:46, , 33F
08/04 13:46, 33F
※ 編輯: thausand (114.137.206.215), 08/04/2017 13:52:57
※ 編輯: thausand (114.137.206.215), 08/04/2017 13:54:29
噓
08/04 14:00, , 34F
08/04 14:00, 34F
→
08/04 14:00, , 35F
08/04 14:00, 35F
推
08/04 14:00, , 36F
08/04 14:00, 36F
→
08/04 14:00, , 37F
08/04 14:00, 37F
→
08/04 14:00, , 38F
08/04 14:00, 38F
→
08/04 14:00, , 39F
08/04 14:00, 39F
→
08/04 14:04, , 40F
08/04 14:04, 40F
→
08/04 14:06, , 41F
08/04 14:06, 41F
推
08/04 14:15, , 42F
08/04 14:15, 42F
→
08/04 14:16, , 43F
08/04 14:16, 43F
推
08/04 14:18, , 44F
08/04 14:18, 44F
→
08/04 14:18, , 45F
08/04 14:18, 45F
噓
08/04 14:24, , 46F
08/04 14:24, 46F
噓
08/04 14:33, , 47F
08/04 14:33, 47F
推
08/04 14:36, , 48F
08/04 14:36, 48F
噓
08/04 14:43, , 49F
08/04 14:43, 49F
→
08/04 15:36, , 50F
08/04 15:36, 50F
推
08/04 15:42, , 51F
08/04 15:42, 51F
→
08/04 15:42, , 52F
08/04 15:42, 52F
推
08/04 16:01, , 53F
08/04 16:01, 53F
推
08/04 16:17, , 54F
08/04 16:17, 54F
→
08/04 16:36, , 55F
08/04 16:36, 55F
→
08/04 22:35, , 56F
08/04 22:35, 56F
→
08/04 22:35, , 57F
08/04 22:35, 57F
→
08/04 22:35, , 58F
08/04 22:35, 58F
→
08/04 23:14, , 59F
08/04 23:14, 59F
推
08/05 18:52, , 60F
08/05 18:52, 60F
噓
08/05 19:27, , 61F
08/05 19:27, 61F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 21 篇):