[討論] 如果當初LeBron James 2009留在騎士
遙想當年2009那個天之驕子拿到MVP後開了一個底西選,為了冠軍離開了待了6年的克城
看了許久的NBA小弟我剛剛想到當年喬神也是久久沒拿冠軍(也是6年),也拿了一個MVP,
但為了芝加哥
他並沒有離開,繼續奮鬥到那個大家所熟知的結果,而被稱為The G.O.A.T
而我剛剛跟母咪同學吵得不可開交的是,如果當年LBJ沒有離開克里夫蘭,有沒有機會更
接近神?
我是覺得離開騎士去組團就是離神更遙遠啦...而母咪同學覺得不組團拿冠軍就不會超越
MJ
我剛剛去找了下數據,
Year GP GS MPG FG% 3P% FT% RPG APG SPG BPG PPG
2009–10 76 76 39.0 .503 .333 .767 7.3 8.6 1.6 1.0 29.7
1987–88 82 82 40.4 .535 .132 .841 5.5 5.9 3.2 1.6 35.0
這是他們拿MVP當年的數據,而季後賽都是第2輪敗下陣。
而MJ是3年後順利抱得冠軍獎杯,球團為MJ打造了一個歷史強隊。
那我的問題點是,如果當年LBJ沒有離開克城,騎士隊球團也繼續圍繞LBJ打造隊伍,
那LBJ有沒有可能以MVP的身手帶領球隊在3年左右奪冠?
而如果有開啟連霸王朝,有沒有機會比肩喬丹?
--
只發優文
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.145.172
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1497689094.A.FC3.html
噓
06/17 16:46, , 1F
06/17 16:46, 1F
推
06/17 16:46, , 2F
06/17 16:46, 2F
噓
06/17 16:46, , 3F
06/17 16:46, 3F
推
06/17 16:46, , 4F
06/17 16:46, 4F
→
06/17 16:46, , 5F
06/17 16:46, 5F
噓
06/17 16:46, , 6F
06/17 16:46, 6F
推
06/17 16:47, , 7F
06/17 16:47, 7F
推
06/17 16:48, , 8F
06/17 16:48, 8F
→
06/17 16:48, , 9F
06/17 16:48, 9F
→
06/17 16:49, , 10F
06/17 16:49, 10F
推
06/17 16:49, , 11F
06/17 16:49, 11F
→
06/17 16:49, , 12F
06/17 16:49, 12F
噓
06/17 16:50, , 13F
06/17 16:50, 13F
推
06/17 16:50, , 14F
06/17 16:50, 14F
當年MJ也被活塞4比1 怎不拿出來嘴
→
06/17 16:51, , 15F
06/17 16:51, 15F
→
06/17 16:52, , 16F
06/17 16:52, 16F
推
06/17 16:53, , 17F
06/17 16:53, 17F
推
06/17 16:53, , 18F
06/17 16:53, 18F
推
06/17 16:53, , 19F
06/17 16:53, 19F
→
06/17 16:53, , 20F
06/17 16:53, 20F
→
06/17 16:53, , 21F
06/17 16:53, 21F
※ 編輯: ythree (140.112.145.172), 06/17/2017 16:55:41
推
06/17 16:55, , 22F
06/17 16:55, 22F
→
06/17 16:57, , 23F
06/17 16:57, 23F
推
06/17 16:57, , 24F
06/17 16:57, 24F
→
06/17 16:58, , 25F
06/17 16:58, 25F
→
06/17 17:00, , 26F
06/17 17:00, 26F
噓
06/17 17:00, , 27F
06/17 17:00, 27F
→
06/17 17:01, , 28F
06/17 17:01, 28F
推
06/17 17:02, , 29F
06/17 17:02, 29F
→
06/17 17:03, , 30F
06/17 17:03, 30F
噓
06/17 17:04, , 31F
06/17 17:04, 31F
→
06/17 17:05, , 32F
06/17 17:05, 32F
→
06/17 17:05, , 33F
06/17 17:05, 33F
推
06/17 17:06, , 34F
06/17 17:06, 34F
→
06/17 17:06, , 35F
06/17 17:06, 35F
噓
06/17 17:08, , 36F
06/17 17:08, 36F
噓
06/17 17:08, , 37F
06/17 17:08, 37F
還有 76 則推文
噓
06/17 18:05, , 114F
06/17 18:05, 114F
→
06/17 18:05, , 115F
06/17 18:05, 115F
→
06/17 18:06, , 116F
06/17 18:06, 116F
→
06/17 18:07, , 117F
06/17 18:07, 117F
→
06/17 18:07, , 118F
06/17 18:07, 118F
→
06/17 18:08, , 119F
06/17 18:08, 119F
→
06/17 18:08, , 120F
06/17 18:08, 120F
→
06/17 18:09, , 121F
06/17 18:09, 121F
→
06/17 18:12, , 122F
06/17 18:12, 122F
推
06/17 18:16, , 123F
06/17 18:16, 123F
→
06/17 18:16, , 124F
06/17 18:16, 124F
推
06/17 18:20, , 125F
06/17 18:20, 125F
→
06/17 18:20, , 126F
06/17 18:20, 126F
推
06/17 18:21, , 127F
06/17 18:21, 127F
→
06/17 18:21, , 128F
06/17 18:21, 128F
→
06/17 18:21, , 129F
06/17 18:21, 129F
→
06/17 18:23, , 130F
06/17 18:23, 130F
→
06/17 18:23, , 131F
06/17 18:23, 131F
推
06/17 18:29, , 132F
06/17 18:29, 132F
→
06/17 18:29, , 133F
06/17 18:29, 133F
推
06/17 18:31, , 134F
06/17 18:31, 134F
推
06/17 18:32, , 135F
06/17 18:32, 135F
推
06/17 18:33, , 136F
06/17 18:33, 136F
推
06/17 18:37, , 137F
06/17 18:37, 137F
→
06/17 18:39, , 138F
06/17 18:39, 138F
→
06/17 18:39, , 139F
06/17 18:39, 139F
→
06/17 18:39, , 140F
06/17 18:39, 140F
→
06/17 18:39, , 141F
06/17 18:39, 141F
推
06/17 18:41, , 142F
06/17 18:41, 142F
→
06/17 18:41, , 143F
06/17 18:41, 143F
推
06/17 18:42, , 144F
06/17 18:42, 144F
噓
06/17 18:42, , 145F
06/17 18:42, 145F
→
06/17 18:44, , 146F
06/17 18:44, 146F
推
06/17 19:25, , 147F
06/17 19:25, 147F
噓
06/17 20:38, , 148F
06/17 20:38, 148F
推
06/17 20:40, , 149F
06/17 20:40, 149F
噓
06/17 21:43, , 150F
06/17 21:43, 150F
推
06/17 22:35, , 151F
06/17 22:35, 151F
噓
06/17 23:21, , 152F
06/17 23:21, 152F
→
06/18 10:41, , 153F
06/18 10:41, 153F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):