[討論] 為什麼LeBron James近年很少用螃蟹步了?
早年的LeBron James曾經公開承認過「螃蟹步(Crab Dribble)」是他的招牌動作,
過去也屢次在重要的時刻使用螃蟹步來絕殺對手,
像是季後賽對上巫師這球,
https://youtu.be/lhbM6uuCt74
螃蟹步採出來,幾乎一定可以騙到對手的重心,
如果配上LeBron James的體格,確實是很難防守。
另外這球也是對巫師季後賽採的螃蟹步絕殺,
https://youtu.be/jqpF1COUzoU
基本上所有人都知道James要自己上,
但是幾乎所有防守者都被騙了起來,
以至於輕鬆的上籃絕殺。
雖然螃蟹步沒採好,很容易被吹走步,
像是另一場對巫師的季後賽,
https://youtu.be/hhv101bx9u0
就被抓了走步,
不過這場比賽LeBron James個人也表示,
經過他反覆的看重播,確定沒有走步,是個螃蟹步。
經過將近十年的時間,
聯盟的生態和規則也有所改變,
對於腳步的認定也沒有過去嚴格,
像是Harden的後撤步幾乎都在走步,
也沒什麼被吹,
照這個尺度,如果LeBron James繼續用早年的招牌動作螃蟹步,
應該是更得利於規則才對,
為什麼現在James幾乎很少用螃蟹步了呢?
不曉得有沒有對於LeBron James比賽看比較多的可以介紹一下。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.137.77.82
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1494749827.A.773.html
推
05/14 16:18, , 1F
05/14 16:18, 1F
推
05/14 16:21, , 2F
05/14 16:21, 2F
推
05/14 16:22, , 3F
05/14 16:22, 3F
推
05/14 16:23, , 4F
05/14 16:23, 4F
→
05/14 16:25, , 5F
05/14 16:25, 5F
→
05/14 16:25, , 6F
05/14 16:25, 6F
推
05/14 16:25, , 7F
05/14 16:25, 7F
→
05/14 16:25, , 8F
05/14 16:25, 8F
這影片看起來好普通
推
05/14 16:28, , 9F
05/14 16:28, 9F
→
05/14 16:30, , 10F
05/14 16:30, 10F
推
05/14 16:31, , 11F
05/14 16:31, 11F
噓
05/14 16:31, , 12F
05/14 16:31, 12F
推
05/14 16:37, , 13F
05/14 16:37, 13F
噓
05/14 16:38, , 14F
05/14 16:38, 14F
推
05/14 16:40, , 15F
05/14 16:40, 15F
推
05/14 16:40, , 16F
05/14 16:40, 16F
噓
05/14 16:41, , 17F
05/14 16:41, 17F
推
05/14 16:43, , 18F
05/14 16:43, 18F
推
05/14 16:50, , 19F
05/14 16:50, 19F
→
05/14 16:50, , 20F
05/14 16:50, 20F
推
05/14 16:50, , 21F
05/14 16:50, 21F
推
05/14 16:51, , 22F
05/14 16:51, 22F
Harden都是幾乎收球了第一步才踩出去,然後在後撤,很明顯吧。
推
05/14 16:54, , 23F
05/14 16:54, 23F
推
05/14 17:03, , 24F
05/14 17:03, 24F
→
05/14 17:03, , 25F
05/14 17:03, 25F
推
05/14 17:04, , 26F
05/14 17:04, 26F
→
05/14 17:05, , 27F
05/14 17:05, 27F
推
05/14 17:05, , 28F
05/14 17:05, 28F
推
05/14 17:06, , 29F
05/14 17:06, 29F
推
05/14 17:07, , 30F
05/14 17:07, 30F
推
05/14 17:09, , 31F
05/14 17:09, 31F
→
05/14 17:09, , 32F
05/14 17:09, 32F
→
05/14 17:10, , 33F
05/14 17:10, 33F
→
05/14 17:10, , 34F
05/14 17:10, 34F
推
05/14 17:11, , 35F
05/14 17:11, 35F
→
05/14 17:12, , 36F
05/14 17:12, 36F
→
05/14 17:12, , 37F
05/14 17:12, 37F
還有 50 則推文
還有 4 段內文
推
05/14 20:11, , 88F
05/14 20:11, 88F
推
05/14 20:28, , 89F
05/14 20:28, 89F
推
05/14 20:40, , 90F
05/14 20:40, 90F
→
05/14 21:00, , 91F
05/14 21:00, 91F
推
05/14 21:01, , 92F
05/14 21:01, 92F
→
05/14 21:01, , 93F
05/14 21:01, 93F
→
05/14 21:01, , 94F
05/14 21:01, 94F
→
05/14 21:02, , 95F
05/14 21:02, 95F
推
05/14 21:03, , 96F
05/14 21:03, 96F
→
05/14 21:04, , 97F
05/14 21:04, 97F
推
05/14 21:23, , 98F
05/14 21:23, 98F
→
05/14 21:24, , 99F
05/14 21:24, 99F
→
05/14 21:27, , 100F
05/14 21:27, 100F
推
05/14 21:30, , 101F
05/14 21:30, 101F
→
05/14 21:30, , 102F
05/14 21:30, 102F
推
05/14 21:32, , 103F
05/14 21:32, 103F
→
05/14 21:32, , 104F
05/14 21:32, 104F
推
05/14 21:35, , 105F
05/14 21:35, 105F
推
05/14 21:46, , 106F
05/14 21:46, 106F
推
05/14 22:02, , 107F
05/14 22:02, 107F
噓
05/14 22:23, , 108F
05/14 22:23, 108F
推
05/14 22:25, , 109F
05/14 22:25, 109F
推
05/14 22:46, , 110F
05/14 22:46, 110F
→
05/14 23:25, , 111F
05/14 23:25, 111F
→
05/14 23:26, , 112F
05/14 23:26, 112F
→
05/14 23:26, , 113F
05/14 23:26, 113F
→
05/14 23:26, , 114F
05/14 23:26, 114F
→
05/14 23:27, , 115F
05/14 23:27, 115F
→
05/14 23:28, , 116F
05/14 23:28, 116F
→
05/14 23:28, , 117F
05/14 23:28, 117F
→
05/14 23:29, , 118F
05/14 23:29, 118F
→
05/14 23:29, , 119F
05/14 23:29, 119F
→
05/14 23:29, , 120F
05/14 23:29, 120F
→
05/14 23:31, , 121F
05/14 23:31, 121F
→
05/14 23:31, , 122F
05/14 23:31, 122F
→
05/14 23:31, , 123F
05/14 23:31, 123F
推
05/14 23:58, , 124F
05/14 23:58, 124F
噓
05/15 01:44, , 125F
05/15 01:44, 125F
→
05/15 01:45, , 126F
05/15 01:45, 126F
推
05/15 04:13, , 127F
05/15 04:13, 127F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):