[討論] Aldridge跟Howard是不是最被高估的內線?
當初在魔術的Howard
有四射手搭配
空間拉開的情況下在籃下無往不利
之後轉戰湖人 火箭 到現在的老鷹
貧乏的進攻技巧成了他最大的弱點
星度直線下滑成為藍領苦工
當初在阿拓的Aldridge
跟Lillard的搭配也曾經大殺四方
但到了馬刺後進攻招式變的單調
永遠就是一千零一招的轉身跳投
比起同隊的老將Gasol
舉凡進攻技巧 防守 籃板能力
似乎沒有一項比的上的
Duncan退休後 原本希望Aldridge能多少頂起這個位置
目前看來希望是完全落空
對火箭G1和G2間還受Duncan親自指導
但這場還是沒醒過來
我絕不會承認我刺迷看比賽看到崩潰跑來發廢文啊啊啊!!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.218.100.82
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1493869646.A.224.html
→
05/04 11:47, , 1F
05/04 11:47, 1F
推
05/04 11:48, , 2F
05/04 11:48, 2F
推
05/04 11:48, , 3F
05/04 11:48, 3F
推
05/04 11:49, , 4F
05/04 11:49, 4F
→
05/04 11:49, , 5F
05/04 11:49, 5F
→
05/04 11:49, , 6F
05/04 11:49, 6F
噓
05/04 11:49, , 7F
05/04 11:49, 7F
推
05/04 11:49, , 8F
05/04 11:49, 8F
→
05/04 11:49, , 9F
05/04 11:49, 9F
推
05/04 11:49, , 10F
05/04 11:49, 10F
推
05/04 11:50, , 11F
05/04 11:50, 11F
推
05/04 11:51, , 12F
05/04 11:51, 12F
→
05/04 11:51, , 13F
05/04 11:51, 13F
噓
05/04 11:51, , 14F
05/04 11:51, 14F
噓
05/04 11:52, , 15F
05/04 11:52, 15F
噓
05/04 11:52, , 16F
05/04 11:52, 16F
→
05/04 11:52, , 17F
05/04 11:52, 17F
噓
05/04 11:52, , 18F
05/04 11:52, 18F
→
05/04 11:52, , 19F
05/04 11:52, 19F
噓
05/04 11:53, , 20F
05/04 11:53, 20F
推
05/04 11:53, , 21F
05/04 11:53, 21F
噓
05/04 11:54, , 22F
05/04 11:54, 22F
推
05/04 11:54, , 23F
05/04 11:54, 23F
→
05/04 11:55, , 24F
05/04 11:55, 24F
→
05/04 11:55, , 25F
05/04 11:55, 25F
推
05/04 11:55, , 26F
05/04 11:55, 26F
推
05/04 11:56, , 27F
05/04 11:56, 27F
推
05/04 11:56, , 28F
05/04 11:56, 28F
→
05/04 11:56, , 29F
05/04 11:56, 29F
推
05/04 11:56, , 30F
05/04 11:56, 30F
推
05/04 11:57, , 31F
05/04 11:57, 31F
推
05/04 11:57, , 32F
05/04 11:57, 32F
推
05/04 11:57, , 33F
05/04 11:57, 33F
推
05/04 11:59, , 34F
05/04 11:59, 34F
→
05/04 12:00, , 35F
05/04 12:00, 35F
推
05/04 12:00, , 36F
05/04 12:00, 36F
推
05/04 12:02, , 37F
05/04 12:02, 37F
推
05/04 12:02, , 38F
05/04 12:02, 38F
推
05/04 12:02, , 39F
05/04 12:02, 39F
還有 34 則推文
推
05/04 12:28, , 74F
05/04 12:28, 74F
推
05/04 12:29, , 75F
05/04 12:29, 75F
推
05/04 12:29, , 76F
05/04 12:29, 76F
→
05/04 12:29, , 77F
05/04 12:29, 77F
噓
05/04 12:30, , 78F
05/04 12:30, 78F
推
05/04 12:31, , 79F
05/04 12:31, 79F
推
05/04 12:32, , 80F
05/04 12:32, 80F
→
05/04 12:34, , 81F
05/04 12:34, 81F
噓
05/04 12:35, , 82F
05/04 12:35, 82F
→
05/04 12:35, , 83F
05/04 12:35, 83F
→
05/04 12:40, , 84F
05/04 12:40, 84F
推
05/04 12:48, , 85F
05/04 12:48, 85F
推
05/04 12:51, , 86F
05/04 12:51, 86F
推
05/04 12:56, , 87F
05/04 12:56, 87F
→
05/04 12:56, , 88F
05/04 12:56, 88F
推
05/04 12:58, , 89F
05/04 12:58, 89F
噓
05/04 13:05, , 90F
05/04 13:05, 90F
推
05/04 13:06, , 91F
05/04 13:06, 91F
推
05/04 13:09, , 92F
05/04 13:09, 92F
推
05/04 13:18, , 93F
05/04 13:18, 93F
噓
05/04 13:21, , 94F
05/04 13:21, 94F
推
05/04 13:27, , 95F
05/04 13:27, 95F
噓
05/04 13:30, , 96F
05/04 13:30, 96F
推
05/04 13:33, , 97F
05/04 13:33, 97F
→
05/04 13:35, , 98F
05/04 13:35, 98F
噓
05/04 13:39, , 99F
05/04 13:39, 99F
推
05/04 13:45, , 100F
05/04 13:45, 100F
噓
05/04 13:56, , 101F
05/04 13:56, 101F
推
05/04 14:08, , 102F
05/04 14:08, 102F
→
05/04 14:20, , 103F
05/04 14:20, 103F
噓
05/04 14:56, , 104F
05/04 14:56, 104F
推
05/04 15:43, , 105F
05/04 15:43, 105F
推
05/04 16:19, , 106F
05/04 16:19, 106F
噓
05/04 19:31, , 107F
05/04 19:31, 107F
推
05/04 19:44, , 108F
05/04 19:44, 108F
推
05/04 20:51, , 109F
05/04 20:51, 109F
→
05/04 20:51, , 110F
05/04 20:51, 110F
推
05/04 21:04, , 111F
05/04 21:04, 111F
推
05/04 21:40, , 112F
05/04 21:40, 112F
推
05/05 01:29, , 113F
05/05 01:29, 113F