[討論] 買犯算是一門藝術嗎
每次看火箭的比賽LIVE文
下面推文總是有版友各種吹捧JAMES的買犯技術
賞心悅目的買犯
摸到毛就+2分
吹到防守者不要不要的
今晚你要吃幾碗
哇 真是藝術
感覺上買犯應該是一門顯學 莫測高深的籃球技術
可是我們反觀另外一位JAMES
他也是買犯 造犯啊
每次一摔都要付出肉體的碰撞 來換取裁判關愛的眼神 也算是賣肉演出了
卻是動不動就被酸假摔 影帝 彈塗魚 彈皇
是不是評論標準對另一位JAMES寬容了點 對這位JAMES嚴苛了點?
還是火箭JAMES買犯的確就是一門藝術 遠遠不是另外一位JAMES比得上的?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.174.143.67
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1492651711.A.2B7.html
→
04/20 09:29, , 1F
04/20 09:29, 1F
噓
04/20 09:29, , 2F
04/20 09:29, 2F
→
04/20 09:29, , 3F
04/20 09:29, 3F
推
04/20 09:30, , 4F
04/20 09:30, 4F
噓
04/20 09:31, , 5F
04/20 09:31, 5F
→
04/20 09:31, , 6F
04/20 09:31, 6F
推
04/20 09:31, , 7F
04/20 09:31, 7F
→
04/20 09:32, , 8F
04/20 09:32, 8F
推
04/20 09:32, , 9F
04/20 09:32, 9F
推
04/20 09:32, , 10F
04/20 09:32, 10F
→
04/20 09:32, , 11F
04/20 09:32, 11F
推
04/20 09:32, , 12F
04/20 09:32, 12F
→
04/20 09:33, , 13F
04/20 09:33, 13F
噓
04/20 09:33, , 14F
04/20 09:33, 14F
→
04/20 09:33, , 15F
04/20 09:33, 15F
→
04/20 09:34, , 16F
04/20 09:34, 16F
→
04/20 09:34, , 17F
04/20 09:34, 17F
→
04/20 09:35, , 18F
04/20 09:35, 18F
推
04/20 09:38, , 19F
04/20 09:38, 19F
噓
04/20 09:39, , 20F
04/20 09:39, 20F
→
04/20 09:39, , 21F
04/20 09:39, 21F
推
04/20 09:40, , 22F
04/20 09:40, 22F
→
04/20 09:40, , 23F
04/20 09:40, 23F
推
04/20 09:42, , 24F
04/20 09:42, 24F
推
04/20 09:42, , 25F
04/20 09:42, 25F
推
04/20 09:43, , 26F
04/20 09:43, 26F
推
04/20 09:43, , 27F
04/20 09:43, 27F
推
04/20 09:43, , 28F
04/20 09:43, 28F
→
04/20 09:43, , 29F
04/20 09:43, 29F
→
04/20 09:44, , 30F
04/20 09:44, 30F
推
04/20 09:45, , 31F
04/20 09:45, 31F
→
04/20 09:45, , 32F
04/20 09:45, 32F
噓
04/20 09:47, , 33F
04/20 09:47, 33F
推
04/20 09:47, , 34F
04/20 09:47, 34F
噓
04/20 09:48, , 35F
04/20 09:48, 35F
推
04/20 09:48, , 36F
04/20 09:48, 36F
→
04/20 09:49, , 37F
04/20 09:49, 37F
→
04/20 09:49, , 38F
04/20 09:49, 38F
噓
04/20 09:51, , 39F
04/20 09:51, 39F
還有 22 則推文
推
04/20 10:06, , 62F
04/20 10:06, 62F
推
04/20 10:06, , 63F
04/20 10:06, 63F
推
04/20 10:09, , 64F
04/20 10:09, 64F
推
04/20 10:15, , 65F
04/20 10:15, 65F
→
04/20 10:16, , 66F
04/20 10:16, 66F
→
04/20 10:17, , 67F
04/20 10:17, 67F
推
04/20 10:22, , 68F
04/20 10:22, 68F
→
04/20 10:23, , 69F
04/20 10:23, 69F
→
04/20 10:23, , 70F
04/20 10:23, 70F
推
04/20 10:30, , 71F
04/20 10:30, 71F
推
04/20 10:34, , 72F
04/20 10:34, 72F
→
04/20 10:35, , 73F
04/20 10:35, 73F
推
04/20 10:36, , 74F
04/20 10:36, 74F
推
04/20 10:36, , 75F
04/20 10:36, 75F
→
04/20 10:36, , 76F
04/20 10:36, 76F
推
04/20 10:36, , 77F
04/20 10:36, 77F
推
04/20 10:37, , 78F
04/20 10:37, 78F
推
04/20 10:39, , 79F
04/20 10:39, 79F
推
04/20 10:39, , 80F
04/20 10:39, 80F
噓
04/20 10:44, , 81F
04/20 10:44, 81F
→
04/20 10:46, , 82F
04/20 10:46, 82F
推
04/20 10:47, , 83F
04/20 10:47, 83F
推
04/20 10:48, , 84F
04/20 10:48, 84F
推
04/20 10:49, , 85F
04/20 10:49, 85F
→
04/20 10:50, , 86F
04/20 10:50, 86F
推
04/20 11:07, , 87F
04/20 11:07, 87F
→
04/20 11:38, , 88F
04/20 11:38, 88F
→
04/20 11:39, , 89F
04/20 11:39, 89F
→
04/20 11:40, , 90F
04/20 11:40, 90F
推
04/20 11:52, , 91F
04/20 11:52, 91F
推
04/20 12:31, , 92F
04/20 12:31, 92F
→
04/20 13:02, , 93F
04/20 13:02, 93F
→
04/20 13:44, , 94F
04/20 13:44, 94F
→
04/20 13:44, , 95F
04/20 13:44, 95F
推
04/20 15:27, , 96F
04/20 15:27, 96F
→
04/20 15:28, , 97F
04/20 15:28, 97F
推
04/20 15:40, , 98F
04/20 15:40, 98F
→
04/20 15:41, , 99F
04/20 15:41, 99F
→
04/20 15:41, , 100F
04/20 15:41, 100F
推
04/20 15:56, , 101F
04/20 15:56, 101F